论文信息 - String Adjunct Grammars: II. Equational Representation, Null Symbols, and Linguistic Relevance

String Adjunct Grammars: II. Equational Representation, Null Symbols, and Linguistic Relevance

In this paper, we continue the study of String Adjunct Grammars (AG) introduced in Joshi et al. (1972). In particular, equational representations of LAG's, LAG's with null symbols, and some special cases of LAG's are studied. Linguistic relevance of these grammars is also discussed in some detail.

[1] Leon Sholom Levy. Generalized local adjunction and replacement in adjunct languages , 1970 .

[2] John E. Hopcroft,et al. Scattered Context Grammars , 1969, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[3] G. H. Matthews. A Note on Assymmetry in Phrase Structure Grammars , 1964, Inf. Control..

[4] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. A Class Of Transformational Grammars , 1973 .

[5] Johnson Murdoch Hart. Formal properties of local-adjunct languages (lal's). , 1972 .

[6] Seymour Ginsburg,et al. The mathematical theory of context free languages , 1966 .

[7] Aravind K. Joshi. Properties of Formal Grammars with mixed Type of Rules and their Linguistic Relevance , 1969, COLING.

[8] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[9] Leon S. Levy,et al. Structural Aspects of Local Adjunct Languages , 1973, Inf. Control..

[10] NAOMI SAGER,et al. Syntactic Analysis of Natural Language , 1967, Adv. Comput..

[11] L. S. Levy. Tree Adjunct, Parenthesis, and Distributed Adjunct Grammars , 1971 .

[12] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. String Adjunct Grammars: I. Local and Distributed Adjunction , 1972, Inf. Control..