The uses of user resistance for the institutionalization of power in systems implementation

User resistance to the implementation of new information systems (IS) is a well-established feature of the IS literature. Much of this work takes a managerialist perspective, seeing user resistance as simply dysfunctional, seeking effective ways for system implementers to overcome resistance or concerned to understanding the roots of user resistance. Occasionally, user resistance is seen as having positive qualities. In this paper, however, we want to explore the wider, deeper, and subtler uses of user resistance for systems implementers. We have adopted Clegg’s “circuits of power” framework within a broader political process approach to change. Using this framework and the results of a small pilot study, we make a number of propositions that can be tested in forthcoming fieldwork. This paper forms part of a wider study of the institutionalization of the power of “internal consultants” in a higher education institution in Saudi Arabia.

[1]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Interpreting an ERP-implementation project from a stakeholder perspective , 2015 .

[2]  James Backhouse,et al.  Circuits of Power in Creating de jure Standards: Shaping an International Information Systems Security Standard , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  R. Quinn Productivity, Management Information Systems, and Resistance: Towards a Better Understanding , 1976 .

[4]  Hee-Ok Jun The Role of User Participation in Information Systems Development : Implications from a Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[5]  HeJun,et al.  The Role of User Participation in Information Systems Development , 2008 .

[6]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Perceptions of Conflict and Success in Information Systems Development Projects , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  J. Vann,et al.  Resistance to Change and the Language of Public Organizations: A Look at “Clashing Grammars” in Large-Scale Information Technology Projects , 2004 .

[8]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems and User Resistance: Theory and Practice , 1988, Comput. J..

[9]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain , 1995, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[11]  James J. Jiang,et al.  User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[13]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[15]  R. W. Griffeth,et al.  Changing a management information system: managing resistance by attending to the rights and responsibilities of employees , 1990 .

[16]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  A process view on end-user resistance during construction IT implementations , 2009, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[17]  Leiser Silva,et al.  From disruptions to struggles: Theorizing power in ERP implementation projects , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[19]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology Implementers' Responses to User Resistance: Nature and Effects , 2012, MIS Q..

[20]  Annette Mills,et al.  Understanding and addressing user resistance to IS implementation in a lean context , 2011, ECIS.

[21]  Leiser Silva,et al.  Epistemological and theoretical challenges for studying power and politics in information systems , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[23]  Sue Newell,et al.  Exploring the Importance of Participation in the Post-Implementation Period of an ES Project: A Neglected Area , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[25]  Ravindra Krovi,et al.  Identifying the causes of resistance to IS implementation: A change theory perspective , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don't Exist by E. Morozov, ed., , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[27]  R. Rupnik,et al.  A model for resistance management in IT projects and programs , 2011 .

[28]  Beverley G. Hope,et al.  IT Projects: Conflict, Governance, and Systems Thinking , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[29]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective , 2009 .

[30]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Conflict Analysis and Information Systems: A Rough Set Approach , 2006, RSKT.

[31]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[32]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[34]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Computerization and management: A study of conflict and change , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Marjolein van Offenbeek,et al.  Managing IS adoption in ambivalent groups , 2011, CACM.

[36]  Stephen C. Wingreen,et al.  Examining user resistance and management strategies in enterprise system implementations , 2007, SIGMIS CPR '07.

[37]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[38]  Erica L. Wagner Interconnecting Information Systems Narrative Research: An End-to-End Approach for Process-Oriented Field Studies , 2002, Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology.

[39]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[40]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change , 2005 .

[41]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[42]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts , 2001, DATB.

[44]  Deborah Bunker,et al.  Circuits of Power: A Study of Mandated Compliance to an Information Systems Security De Jure Standard in a Government Organization , 2010, MIS Q..

[45]  Shari S. C. Shang,et al.  Managing User Resistance in Enterprise Systems Implementation , 2004, AMCIS.

[46]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1986 POWER OVER USERS : ITS EXERCISE BY SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS , 2017 .

[47]  Régis Meissonier,et al.  Toward an ‘IT Conflict-Resistance Theory’: action research during IT pre-implementation , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Thomas L. Legare MINIMIZING RESISTANCE TO TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE A Power and Politics Approach , 1995 .