Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model for single and multiple dowel-type wood connections

A new three-dimensional finite solid element (3D FE) model for dowel-type wood connections was developed using the concept of a beam on a nonlinear wood foundation, which addresses the intricate wood crushing behaviour under the connector in a dowel type connection. In order to implement the concept of wood foundation with solid elements, a 3D FE wood foundation model was defined within a prescribed foundation zone surrounding the dowel. Based on anisotropic plasticity material theory, the material model for the foundation zone was developed using effective foundation material constants that were defined from dowel-embedment test data. New 3D FE single nail connection models were developed that incorporated the wood foundation model. The 3D wood foundation model was justified and validated using dowel-embedment test data with a range of dowel diameters, from a 2.5-mm nail to a 25.4-mm bolt. The connection models provided successful results in simulating the characteristics of load-slip behaviour that were experimentally observed. Based on the success of the single nail connection models, several applications of the 3D FE connection models were investigated including statistical wood material models, bolted connection models and a multiple nail connection model. Throughout the application studies, discussion of the benefits and limitations of the new model approach using the 3D FE wood foundation are presented. Also, future areas of study are proposed in order to improve the 3D FE dowel-type wood connections models.

[1]  J. M. Dinwoodie,et al.  Timber, its nature and behaviour , 1981 .

[2]  Dale W. Wilson,et al.  Elasto-Plastic Failure Analysis of Composite Bolted Joints , 1986 .

[3]  P D Rodd,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model for locally reinforced timber joints made with hollow dowel fasteners , 2000 .

[4]  Jin Wu,et al.  Three-dimensional nonlinear orthotropic finite element material model for wood , 2000 .

[5]  Borg Madsen,et al.  Behaviour of Timber Connections , 2000 .

[6]  P D Rodd,et al.  High‐performance dowel‐type joints for timber structures , 2003 .

[7]  Lawrence A. Soltis,et al.  Bearing Strength of Bolted Timber Joints , 1986 .

[8]  Dong-Sheng Jeng,et al.  Finite element modeling for the mechanical behavior of dowel-type timber joints , 2003 .

[9]  T. J. Urbanik,et al.  Bilinear modelling of cellulosic orthotropic nonlinear materials , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas E. McLain,et al.  Bolted Wood‐Joint Yield Model , 1983 .

[11]  R. Hill The mathematical theory of plasticity , 1950 .

[12]  C. Shih,et al.  Further Developments in Anisotropic Plasticity , 1978 .

[13]  M. A. Erki Modelling the load–slip behaviour of timber joints with mechanical fasteners , 1991 .

[14]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Load-slip characteristics for connections with common nails , 1977 .

[15]  William Z. Savage,et al.  Constitutive Equations for Engineering Materials, Vol. 1. Elasticity and Modeling , 1983 .

[16]  Fw Smith,et al.  MODELING BOLTED CONNECTIONS IN WOOD: REVIEW , 1997 .

[17]  Pj Pellicane,et al.  Nonlinear material models for analysis of bolted wood connections , 1997 .

[18]  Maria Stefanescu,et al.  Lateral resistance of traditional Japanese post-and-beam frames under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions , 2000 .

[19]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Load-slip characteristics of nails , 1974 .

[20]  Zhongwei Guan,et al.  DVW--LOCAL REINFORCEMENT FOR TIMBER JOINTS , 2001 .

[21]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Analysis of wood diaphragms and trusses. Part II: Truss-plate connections , 1977 .

[22]  M. A. McCarthy,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-bolt, single-lap composite bolted joints: Part II––effects of bolt-hole clearance , 2005 .

[23]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Perpendicular-to-Grain Strength of Douglas-Fir , 1975 .

[24]  Rainer Görlacher,et al.  Compression perpendicular to the grain , 2004 .

[25]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[26]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Plasticity for Structural Engineers , 1988 .

[27]  Th.B. Kermanidis,et al.  A three‐dimensional progressive damage model for bolted joints in composite laminates subjected to tensile loading , 2001 .

[29]  David Michael Moses Constitutive and analytical models for structural composite lumber with applications to bolted connections , 2000 .

[30]  Raymundo Dávalos-Sotelo,et al.  Bolted Connections in Wood under Bending/Tension Loading , 1992 .

[31]  J. D. Barrett Effect of Size on Tension Perpendicular-To-Grain Strength of Douglas-Fir , 2007 .

[32]  Yh Chui,et al.  Stress-Strain Relationship of Common Wire Nails Under Reversed Cyclic Loading , 1998 .

[33]  Larry Lessard,et al.  Two-Dimensional Modeling of Composite Pinned-Joint Failure , 1995 .

[34]  I. Smith Coefficient of friction values applicable to contact surfaces between mild steel connectors such as bolts and dry European whitewood , 1983 .

[35]  B. O. Hilson,et al.  Embedment testing for bolts a comparison of the European and American procedures , 1995 .

[36]  Somasundaram Valliappan,et al.  Non‐linear analysis for anisotropic materials , 1976 .

[37]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Analysis and Design of Griplam Nailed Connections , 1975 .

[38]  M. A. McCarthy,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of single-bolt, single-lap composite bolted joints: part I—model development and validation , 2005 .

[39]  Jozsef Bodig,et al.  Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composites , 1982 .