Benchmarking of Singapore maritime cluster: the role of cluster facilitators

PurposeThis article analyses the role of cluster facilitators in the Singapore maritime cluster. Singapore has been recognised for its pro-business policies and its ability to attract international shipping companies to set up the ship ownership headquarters and ship management activities in Singapore.Design/methodology/approachThe research is an empirical investigation on the approach for industrial cluster development of the Singapore maritime cluster, using the case study research methodology. The case study approach leverages on multiple sources of evidence from deep interviews (of 24 Singaporean firms and 13 Norwegian firms) related observations, documentation and archival records. As a means of contributing to the cluster renewal process, Singapore as the country embarks on the next stage of maritime cluster development, a benchmarking against the Norwegian Innovation Cluster has been incorporated.FindingsThe research findings reveals that Singapore is lacking in innovation activities that entails multi-firms collaborations and collaboration between multi-firms and research institutions. The existence of cluster organisation to facilitate collaborations between firms in the cluster and between firms in the cluster with research institutions is another contributing factor that are not institutionalised in the Singapore maritime cluster.Research limitations/implicationsThough the research is grounded primarily on the international business theory, particularly from firm- and country-specific advantages of location decisions, the economic geography theory and cluster theory also complement the theoretical grounding.Practical implicationsThe findings derived from this research aim to facilitate policy makers, maritime leaders and practitioners to develop effective courses of action in current and future maritime industry development.Originality/valueThe research provides value to maritime industry stakeholders, maritime leaders and policy makers in their firm positioning strategy. Thus, the research adds values to the maritime industry with similar country perspectives and firm values for developing policies.

[1]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The contribution of local environments to competence creation in multinational enterprises , 2014 .

[2]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[3]  Anand Prakash,et al.  Digital transformation using blockchain technology in the construction industry , 2020 .

[4]  R. Mudambi.  Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries , 2008 .

[5]  Grazia D. Santangelo,et al.  The evolution of strategic asset-seeking acquisitions by emerging market multinationals , 2017 .

[6]  Arthur P. Becker,et al.  Psychological Production and Conservation , 1949 .

[7]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Why Study National Systems and National Styles of Innovation , 1998 .

[8]  Torben Damgaard,et al.  Cluster Facilitation from a Cluster Life Cycle Perspective , 2013 .

[9]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[10]  P. Panayides,et al.  Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments , 2018, Maritime Business Review.

[11]  H. V. D. Ven.  The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[12]  Peter Hall,et al.  The Location and Global Network Structure of Maritime Advanced Producer Services , 2011 .

[13]  Ron Martin,et al.  Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the Life Cycle Model? , 2011 .

[14]  M. Shinohara,et al.  Maritime cluster of Japan: implications for the cluster formation policies , 2010 .

[15]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  What is Strategy , 2012 .

[16]  Sushil Punia,et al.  Trajectory of research on maritime transportation in the era of digitization , 2021 .

[17]  George J Bruce,et al.  The strength of Malaysian maritime cluster: The development of maritime policy , 2011 .

[18]  Mads Bruun Ingstrup,et al.  When Firms Take the Lead in Facilitating Clusters , 2014 .

[19]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity , 1999 .

[20]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[21]  Felipe Mendes Borini,et al.  Environmental conditions, subsidiaries’ autonomy and global innovation in multinational enterprises , 2020 .

[22]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[23]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants , 2001 .

[24]  Michael Porter,et al.  The Economic Performance of Regions , 2003 .

[25]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Empirics and Policy , 2011 .

[26]  J. Dunning.  Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity , 1994 .

[27]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  Epistemic Communities and Cluster Dynamics: On the Role of Knowledge in Industrial Districts , 2005 .

[28]  Mark Lorenzen.  Editorial , 2005 .

[29]  Torger Reve.  Norway – a global maritime knowledge hub , 2009 .

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[31]  Amir Sasson,et al.  Theoretical and methodological advances in cluster research , 2015 .

[32]  Richard Shearmur,et al.  Maritime clusters in diverse regional contexts: The case of Canada , 2009 .

[33]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Stephen Cahoon,et al.  Factors influencing innovation in maritime clusters: An empirical study from Australia , 2019, Marine Policy.

[35]  Mark Goh,et al.  Studying the sustainability of third party logistics growth using system dynamics , 2019, Journal of Modelling in Management.

[36]  Torben Damgaard,et al.  Cluster Development through Public Sector Facilitation , 2010 .

[37]  M. Porter.  The five competitive forces that shape strategy. , 2008, Harvard business review.

[38]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[39]  D. S. Lim,et al.  The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms , 2012 .

[40]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[41]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Origin and Growth of Industry Clusters: The Making of Silicon Valley and Detroit , 2010 .

[42]  S. Paul,et al.  The Impact Of Technology Adoption On Firm Productivity , 1995 .

[43]  Örjan Sölvell,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations 25 years – opening up new perspectives on competitiveness , 2015 .

[44]  Kamarulzaman Ab. Aziz,et al.  Cluster-Based Policy Making: Assessing Performance and Sustaining Competitiveness , 2008 .

[45]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Innovation: Location Matters , 2001 .

[46]  M. Ingstrup.  The role of cluster facilitators , 2010 .

[47]  Ann Verhetsel,et al.  World maritime cities: From which cities do container shipping companies make decisions? , 2009 .

[48]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .

[49]  Christian H.M. Ketels,et al.  Strengthening Clusters and Competitiveness in Europe The Role of Cluster Organisations , 2012 .

[50]  Grazia D. Santangelo,et al.  MNE Subsidiaries’ Outsourcing and Insourcing of R&D: The Role of Local Institutions , 2016 .

[51]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City , 1995 .

[52]  C. Ketels.  The Development of the cluster concept - present experiences and further developments , 2003 .

[53]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[54]  Nick Henry,et al.  From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters’: a model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations , 2003 .

[55]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Maritime cluster evolution based on symbiosis theory and Lotka–Volterra model , 2013 .

[56]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[57]  Brian Snowdon,et al.  Competitive Advantage Revisited: Michael Porter on Strategy and Competitiveness , 2007 .

[58]  Stratos Papadimitriou,et al.  Strategy, policy, and the formulation of maritime cluster typologies , 2017 .

[59]  Teresa de Noronha,et al.  A Differentiation Framework for Maritime Clusters: Comparisons across Europe , 2013 .

[60]  Balan Sundarakani,et al.  The impact of firm size, firm age and environmental management certification on the relationship between green supply chain practices and corporate performance , 2019, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[61]  Mark Lorenzen,et al.  Editorial Why do Clusters Change , 2005 .

[62]  David Doloreux.  What is a maritime cluster , 2017 .

[63]  Indu Ramachandran,et al.  Subsidiary Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Opportunity: An Institutional Perspective , 2019, Journal of International Management.

[64]  H. Akpinar,et al.  Managing complexity in maritime business: understanding the smart changes of globalization , 2021 .

[65]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[66]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Geographical Clustering of Innovation , 2012 .

[67]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[68]  F. Malerba,et al.  The Geography of Innovation and Economic Clustering: Some Introductory Notes , 2001 .

[69]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[70]  P. Cooke,et al.  Structural Competitiveness and Learning Regions , 2000 .

[71]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  Commercializing biomedical science in a rapidly changing “triple-helix” nexus: The experience of the National University of Singapore , 2007 .