A high-sensitivity magnetocardiography system with a divided gradiometer array inside a low boil-off Dewar

We fabricated a low-noise 64-channel first-order axial gradiometer system for measuring magnetocardiography (MCG) signals. The key technical features of the system are the compact structure of the gradiometer, division of the sensor array plate, direct mounting of the sensor plates into the Dewar bottom, reduced neck diameter of the liquid He Dewar, and compact readout electronics. To make the refill interval of liquid He longer, the distance between the compensation coil of the gradiometer and the input coil pads of the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) was reduced to 20 mm. By using direct ultrasonic bonding of Nb wires between the pickup coil wires and input coil pads, the superconductive connection structure became simple. The baseline of the first-order gradiometer is 70 mm, a little longer than for typical conventional axial gradiometers, to provide a larger signal amplitude for deep sources. The 64-channel gradiometer array consists of four blocks, and each block is fixed separately onto the bottom of the Dewar. The neck diameter of the He Dewar (192 mm) is smaller than the bottom diameter (280 mm) in which the gradiometers are distributed. The average boil-off rate of the Dewar is 3 l per day when the 64-channel system is in operation every day. Double relaxation oscillation SQUIDs (DROSs) having large flux-to-voltage transfer coefficients were used to operate SQUIDs via compact electronics. The magnetically shielded room (MSR) has a wall thickness of 80 mm, and consists of two layers of permalloy and one layer of aluminum. When the 64-channel system was installed inside the MSR, the field noise level of the system was about 3.5 fTrms Hz−1/2 at 100 Hz. MCG measurements with high signal quality were done successfully using the developed system. In addition to the parameter analysis method, we developed software for the three-dimensional imaging of the myocardial current on a realistic image of the heart based on the anatomical image of the torso.

[1]  Dietmar Drung,et al.  Advanced Squid Read-Out Electronics , 1996 .

[2]  In-Seon Kim,et al.  64-channel magnetocardiogram system based on double relaxation oscillation SQUID planar gradiometers , 2006 .

[3]  R. Fenici,et al.  Clinical application of magnetocardiography , 2005, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[4]  A Kandori,et al.  Magnetocardiographic determination of the developmental changes in PQ, QRS and QT intervals in the foetus , 2000, Acta paediatrica.

[5]  P. Hill,et al.  Resting Magnetocardiography Predicts 3‐Year Mortality in Patients Presenting with Acute Chest Pain without ST Segment Elevation , 2008, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[6]  J. Steinberg,et al.  Magnetocardiography Throws Its Hat in the Ring , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  Akihiko Kandori,et al.  Reconstruction of action potential of repolarization in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Horst Rogalla,et al.  (Double) relaxation oscillation SQUIDs with high flux‐to‐voltage transfer: Simulations and experiments , 1994 .

[9]  D. Cohen,et al.  MAGNETOCARDIOGRAMS TAKEN INSIDE A SHIELDED ROOM WITH A SUPERCONDUCTING POINT‐CONTACT MAGNETOMETER , 1970 .

[10]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Magnetocardiography: current status and perspectives. Part II: Clinical applications. , 2002, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[11]  In-Seon Kim,et al.  Can magnetocardiography detect patients with non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction? , 2007, Annals of medicine.

[12]  L. Toivonen,et al.  Magnetocardiography is sensitive to differences in inter-atrial conduction in patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation , 2007 .

[13]  Iwao Yamaguchi,et al.  Magnetocardiograms in clinical medicine: unique information on cardiac ischemia, arrhythmias, and fetal diagnosis. , 2005, Internal medicine.

[14]  D Grönemeyer,et al.  Fetal heart rate variability and complexity in the course of pregnancy. , 1999, Early human development.

[15]  A Kandori,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of QT prolongation by fetal magnetocardiogram--use of QRS and T-wave current-arrow maps. , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[16]  L Trahms,et al.  Magnetocardiographic analysis of the two-dimensional distribution of intra-QRS fractionated activation. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Magnetocardiography Predicts Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Acute Chest Pain , 2005, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[18]  Yon-Kyu Park,et al.  Double relaxation oscillation SQUID with reference junction for biomagnetic multichannel applications , 1997 .

[19]  Kiwoong Kim,et al.  Detection of atrial arrhythmia in superconducting quantum interference device magnetocardiography; preliminary result of a totally-noninvasive localization method for atrial current mapping. , 2007, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[20]  H.J.M. ter Brake,et al.  Elimination of flux-transformer crosstalk in multichannel SQUID magnetometers , 1986 .

[21]  Toivo Katila,et al.  Increased Intra‐QRS Fragmentation in Magnetocardiography as a Predictor of Arrhythmic Events and Mortality in Patients with Cardiac Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.