Implementing real-time grouping for fast egress in emergency

Abstract Mass events such as the Olympic games or popular entertainment gathering often attract hundreds of thousands of people. If an abrupt event (e.g., fire, bomb threat) prompts people to rush to exits, stampedes may occur, creating secondary damages. Thus quickly dispersing crowd population to safe places in the least time while managing to avoid congestion and/or stampede is an important task with the occurrence of such events. This study presents an optimal evacuation model to meet this goal. By identifying some key themes that contribute to crowd disasters, the model implements a real-time concurrent grouping to ensure at-risk people are guided to safe places in the least time. The underlying rationale of the strategy is to advocate that competition should be replaced with coherence, and people should coordinate and collaborate to move out in an orderly way through scientifically using multiple routes. In doing so, each person receives an equal opportunity to exit the incident site, and the general effectiveness of performing an evacuation is achieved to an optimal level. To verify the proposed method, we conduct a simulation in which we compare our method with two benchmark cases: random self-evacuation and herding behavior. The results demonstrate that the proposed strategy can rescue people at risk much faster and more safely than two benchmark cases. We implement the proposed model through a web-based wireless decision support system, which provides a useful tool to both first responders and people affected for time-based crowd management in response to an ongoing crowd incident.

[1]  Richard L. Francis,et al.  Network models for building evacuation , 1982 .

[2]  Earl J. Baker,et al.  Hurricane Evacuation Behavior , 1991, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[3]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  PEDESTRIAN FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN HONG KONG , 1995 .

[4]  R. J. Wheeler,et al.  PEDESTRIAN FLOW CHARACTERISTICS , 1969 .

[5]  Ian Donald Engineering for crowd safety: edited by R.A. Smith and J.F. Dickie. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 428 , 1995 .

[6]  Henry W. Fischer,et al.  Evacuation behaviour: why do some evacuate, while others do not? A case study of the Ephrata, Pennsylvania (USA) evacuation , 1995 .

[7]  John J. Fruin,et al.  Pedestrian planning and design , 1971 .

[8]  Erica D. Kuligowski ELEVATORS FOR OCCUPANT EVACUATION AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS , 2003 .

[9]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[10]  Daniel M. Madrzykowski,et al.  Report of the Technical Investigation of The Station Nightclub Fire (NIST NCSTAR 2) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | NIST , 2005 .

[11]  B. Pushkarev URBAN SPACE FOR PEDESTRIANS , 1975 .

[12]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Crowd modelling in collaborative virtual environments , 1998, VRST '98.

[13]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Pedestrian Speeds on Stairs - An Initial Step for a Simulation Model - , 2004 .

[14]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for walking facilities in Hong Kong , 2000 .

[15]  Earl J. Baker,et al.  Predicting Response to Hurricane Warnings - Reanalysis of Data from 4 Studies , 1979 .

[16]  Katsuya Yamori Going with the flow : Micro-macro dynamics in the macrobehavioral patterns of pedestrian crowds , 1998 .

[17]  Eva D. Regnier,et al.  Public Evacuation Decisions and Hurricane Track Uncertainty , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[18]  J H. Klote,et al.  Feasibility and design considerations of emergency evacuation by elevators , 1992 .

[19]  B. D. Hankin,et al.  Passenger Flow in Subways , 1958 .

[20]  T. Nagatani,et al.  Experiment and simulation of pedestrian counter flow , 2004 .

[21]  L E. Cattaneo,et al.  Investigation of Guardrails for the Protection of Employees from Occupational Hazards | NIST , 1976 .

[22]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour , 2002 .