The Acquisition and Diffusion of Knowledge: The Case of Pest Management Training in Farmer Field Schools, Indonesia

Farmer Field Schools (FFS) are an intensive training approach introduced in the last decade in many developing countries to promote knowledge and uptake of ecologically sensible production approaches, and in particular, integrated pest management which minimises pesticide use. Because of the high training cost, the viability of the program depends crucially on the effectiveness of knowledge diffusion from trained farmers to other farmers. This paper uses panel data from Indonesia to assess the extent of diffusion of knowledge regarding integrated pest management from trained farmers to other farmers. The results confirm that better knowledge leads indeed to reduced pesticide use, and that trained farmers make a modest gain in knowledge. However, there is no significant diffusion of knowledge to other farmers who reside in the same villages as the trained farmers. These results imply that revision in the training procedures and curriculum need to be considered if the FFS approach is to become viable and effective.

[1]  R. Just,et al.  The Potential for Transition to Paid Extension: Some Guiding Economic Principles , 2001 .

[2]  Robert Tripp,et al.  What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study , 2005 .

[3]  Rinku Murgai,et al.  Fiscal Sustainability of Agricultural Extension: The Case of the Farmer Field School Approach - Supplementary Remarks , 2001 .

[4]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[5]  J. Ashby,et al.  Investing in farmers as researchers: experience with local agricultural research committees in Latin America , 2000 .

[6]  Anthony Willett,et al.  Agricultural Extension: Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions , 1999 .

[7]  Gershon Feder,et al.  The Acquisition of Information and the Adoption of New Technology , 1984 .

[8]  Gershon Feder,et al.  Sending Farmers Back to School: The Impact of Farmer Field Schools in Indonesia , 2003 .

[9]  Jock R. Anderson,et al.  Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities , 2004 .

[10]  Randy J. Nelson,et al.  Participatory research and training: ten lessons from the Farmer Field Schools (FFS) in the Andes , 2003 .

[11]  Rinku Murgai,et al.  Fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: the case of the farmer field school approach , 2001 .

[12]  Frederick S. Ruland,et al.  Effects of an international agricultural and horticultural internship on the career and personal development of young adults , 2001 .

[13]  E. van de Fliert,et al.  Integrated pest management : farmer field schools generate sustainable practices : a case study in Central Java evaluating IPM training , 1993 .

[14]  N. Röling,et al.  Transforming extension for sustainable agriculture: The case of integrated pest management in rice in Indonesia , 1994 .

[15]  Graham Thiele,et al.  Farmer field schools and local agricultural research committees: complementary platforms for integrated decision-making in sustainable agriculture. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Ndubi,et al.  Agricultural knowledge and information systems in Kenya: implications for technology dissemination and development. , 2000 .

[17]  S. Morse,et al.  IPM in developing countries: the danger of an ideal , 1997 .

[18]  G. Feder,et al.  The Role of Public Policy in the Diffusion of Improved Agricultural Technology , 1985 .

[19]  B. Simpson,et al.  Farmer Field Schools and the Future of Agricultural Extension in Africa , 2002 .

[20]  Agnes C. Rola,et al.  Do Farmer Field School Graduates Retain and Share What They Learn? An Investigation in Iloilo, Philippines , 2002 .

[21]  Yunita Winarto,et al.  11. Encouraging knowledge exchange: integrated pest management in Indonesia; Learning by improvization: farmers’ experimentation in Mali , 1994 .