Breast compression techniques in screening mammography - A Maltese evaluation project.

INTRODUCTION In screening mammography, the radiographer should be responsible for providing mammograms of high diagnostic value, possibly without subjecting clients to a painful experience. This skill is demonstrated via the technique of breast compression and is explored in this study by analysing insights about methods and underlying principles in regards to this procedure. METHODS One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with radiographers who perform screening mammography in Malta. For data analysis, a descriptive phenomenological approach following a simplified version of Hycner's (1985) method was adopted. RESULTS Five general themes were extracted from the data; meeting the client, preparing the client, the mammography procedure, pain from compression and client turnout. It was determined that the participants alter their breast compression technique according to the client rather than following a rigid step-by-step process and that explanation and requesting client feedback are essential to obtain cooperation. Additionally, mammography positioning and compression application are tailored in a way that encourage compliance, however not at the expense of degrading image quality. Ultimately, it is also believed that a proper breast compression technique positively influences client turnout. CONCLUSION The results of this study demonstrate that radiographers should be flexible in their approach in order to carry out a successful breast compression technique. However, it has also been shown that such effectiveness in practice is gained from experience rather than initial training. If exposed to this study's findings, new mammographers would be able to form a robust core of knowledge before embarking on the challenging specialisation of mammography.

[1]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[2]  J. Hanley,et al.  Measuring the Mortality Impact of Breast Cancer Screening , 2013, Canadian Journal of Public Health.

[3]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  The effect of breast positioning on breast compression in mammography: a pressure distribution perspective , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Katy Szczepura,et al.  A 6-year study of mammographic compression force: Practitioner variability within and between screening sites , 2015 .

[5]  G. McGhee,et al.  Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research. , 2009, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[6]  L. Robinson,et al.  Compression force behaviours: An exploration of the beliefs and values influencing the application of breast compression during screening mammography , 2015 .

[7]  Mary Rickard,et al.  Breast compression in mammography: how much is enough? , 2003, Australasian radiology.

[8]  P. Reeves,et al.  Women's experiences of mammography: a thematic evaluation of the literature , 2015 .

[9]  Sarah J. Tracy Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact , 2012 .

[10]  Richard H. Hycner Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data , 1985 .

[11]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain. , 2009, Clinical imaging.

[12]  L. Tabár,et al.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.

[13]  B. Davey Pain during mammography: Possible risk factors and ways to alleviate pain , 2007 .

[14]  S. Kleiman Phenomenology: to wonder and search for meanings. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[15]  A. Hebrang,et al.  Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees. , 2001, European journal of radiology.

[16]  M. Hadi,et al.  Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy , 2015, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

[17]  Kristine Pysarenko,et al.  What Do Patients Tweet About Their Mammography Experience? , 2016, Academic radiology.

[18]  Mousumi Banerjee,et al.  Reduction in late‐stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer , 2014, Cancer.

[19]  C. Moustakas Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[20]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[21]  I. Verslegers,et al.  Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography , 2003, European Radiology.

[22]  V. Marmarà,et al.  Women’s satisfaction of the Maltese breast screening programme : a cross-sectional survey , 2015 .

[23]  M. Johnson,et al.  Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research , 2000 .

[24]  E. Denton,et al.  Practitioner compression force variation in mammography: A 6-year study , 2013 .

[25]  L. Robinson,et al.  The power and the pain: Mammographic compression research from the service-users' perspective , 2013 .

[26]  Judith Green,et al.  Qualitative methods for health research , 2004 .

[27]  Donald McLean,et al.  The application of breast compression in mammography: a new perspective , 2004 .

[28]  Does an increase in compression force really improve visual image quality in mammography? – An initial investigation , 2013 .

[29]  S. Lester An introduction to phenomenological research , 1999 .

[30]  F. Murphy,et al.  Establishing rigour in qualitative radiography research , 2010 .

[31]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  T. Groenewald A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated , 2004 .

[33]  P. Whelehan Pain in Mammography , 2015 .

[34]  H. Priest An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data. , 2002, Nurse researcher.

[35]  Mark Bevan A Method of Phenomenological Interviewing , 2014, Qualitative health research.

[36]  P Hogg,et al.  Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[37]  Breast compression – An exploration of problem solving and decision-making in mammography , 2015 .

[38]  M. Wanzer,et al.  Perceptions of Health Care Providers' Communication: Relationships Between Patient-Centered Communication and Satisfaction , 2004, Health communication.

[39]  G. Royle,et al.  Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[40]  J. Reed,et al.  Practitioner research in context , 1995 .