The Role of Transacademic Interface Managers in Transformational Sustainability Research and Education

Working towards sustainable solutions requires involving professionals and stakeholders from all sectors of society into research and teaching. This often presents a challenge to scholars at universities, as they lack capacity and time needed for negotiating different agendas, languages, competencies, and cultures among faculty, students, and stakeholders. Management approaches and quality criteria have been developed to cope with this challenge, including concepts of boundary organizations, transdisciplinary research, transition management, and interface management. However, few of these concepts present comprehensive proposals how to facilitate research with stakeholder participation while creating educational opportunities along the lifecycle of a project. The article focuses on the position of a transacademic interface manager (TIM) supporting participatory sustainability research and education efforts. We conceptualize the task portfolio of a TIM; outline the capacities a TIM needs to possess in order to successfully operate; and propose an educational approach for how to train students in becoming a TIM. For this, we review the existing literature on TIMs and present insights from empirical sustainability research and educational projects that involved TIMs in different functions. The article provides practical guidance to universities on how to organize these critical endeavors more effectively and to offer students an additional career perspective.

[1]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Bronwyn L Horsey,et al.  Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability , 2007 .

[3]  John Turnpenny,et al.  Where Now for Post-Normal Science?: A Critical Review of its Development, Definitions, and Uses , 2011 .

[4]  Barry A. Colbert,et al.  Sustainability as a provocation to rethink management education: Building a progressive educative practice , 2014 .

[5]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[6]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[7]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Integrating problem- and project-based learning into sustainability programs: A case study on the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University , 2014 .

[8]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[9]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics , 1993 .

[10]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory , 2006 .

[11]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio‐cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach , 2006 .

[12]  Elizabeth A. Segal.  Social Empathy: A Tool to Address the Contradiction of Working but Still Poor , 2007 .

[13]  Anna Wesselink,et al.  If Post-Normal Science is the Solution, What is the Problem?: The Politics of Activist Environmental Science , 2011 .

[14]  Patricia Gober,et al.  Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater , 2010 .

[15]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity , 1999 .

[16]  C. Pohl,et al.  Principles for designing transdisciplinary research : proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences , 2007 .

[17]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[18]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[19]  Michael Stummer,et al.  Developing roles in change processes – A case study from a public sector organisation , 2010 .

[20]  Bernd Siebenhüner,et al.  Transdisciplinarity for social learning? The contribution of the German socio-ecological research initiative to sustainability governance , 2007 .

[21]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  MANAGING TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[22]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Educating Students in Real-world Sustainability Research: Vision and Implementation , 2011 .

[23]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations , 2005 .

[24]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[25]  James Tansey,et al.  Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project , 2006 .

[26]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[27]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[28]  M. Fraser,et al.  Steps in Intervention Research: Designing and Developing Social Programs , 2010 .

[29]  D. Loorbach.  Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[30]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region , 2008 .

[31]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[32]  K. Blackstock,et al.  Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects , 2007 .

[33]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research , 2007 .

[34]  Louise Potvin,et al.  Implementing participatory intervention and research in communities: lessons from the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project in Canada. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[35]  Martinho Guimaraes Pires Pereira Angela,et al.  Knowledge Representation and Mediation for Transdisciplinary Frameworks: Tools to Inform Debates, Dialogues & Deliberations , 2006 .

[36]  J. Pielke.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[37]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Real‐world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world , 2010 .

[38]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[39]  Clark A. Miller.  Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[40]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond , 2008 .

[41]  Gordon Walker,et al.  Ambivalence, Sustainability and the Governance of Socio-Technical Transitions , 2007 .

[42]  R. Gregory,et al.  Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach , 2007 .

[43]  Kathy S. Mack.  Breaching or disturbing the peace? Organizational aesthetic encounters for informed and enlivened management learning experiences , 2015 .

[44]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Do We Teach What We Preach? An International Comparison of Problem- and Project-Based Learning Courses in Sustainability , 2013 .

[45]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Saguf: Joint Problem Identification and Structuring in Environmental Research , 2007 .

[46]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  User engagement in sustainability research , 2011 .