Priority Rules and Other Inequitable Rationing Methods

In a rationing problem, each agent demands a quantity of a certain commodity and the available resources fall short of total demand. A rationing method solves this problem at every level of resources and individual demands. We impose three axioms: Consistency (with respect to variations of the set of agents), Distributivity, and Distributivity (with respect to variations of the available resources). In the model where the commodity comes in indivisible units, the three axioms characterize the family of priority rules, where individual demands are met lexicographically according to an exogeneous ordering of the agents. In the (more familiar) model where the commodity is divisible, these three axioms plus Scale Invariance(independence of the measurement unit(characterize a rich family of methods. It contains exactly three equitable methods, giving equal shares to equal demands: these are the familiar proportional, uniform gains and uniform losses methods. The inequitable methods in the family partition the agents into priority classes; within each class, they use either the proportional method or an asymmetric weighted version of the uniform gains or uniform losses methods.

[1]  S. Ching An alternative characterization of the uniform rule , 1994 .

[2]  M. Jackson,et al.  Strategy-Proof Allotment Rules , 1997 .

[3]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Stationary deterministic flows in discrete systems 1 , 1983 .

[4]  W. Lucas Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. By Michel L. Balinski and H. Peyton Young , 1985 .

[5]  R. Aumann,et al.  Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud , 1985 .

[6]  Barry O'Neill,et al.  A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud , 1982, Math. Soc. Sci..

[7]  H. Young,et al.  Distributive justice in taxation , 1988 .

[8]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Stationary Deterministic Flows in Discrete Systems I , 1982, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Yves Sprumont The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule , 1991 .

[10]  J. Benassy,et al.  The economics of market disequilibrium , 1982 .

[11]  W. Hofstee,et al.  Allocation by lot: a conceptual and empirical analysis , 1990 .

[12]  H. Moulin Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods , 1987 .

[13]  G. Winslow Triage and justice , 1982 .

[14]  S. Shenker Making greed work in networks: a game-theoretic analysis of switch service disciplines , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[15]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities , 1987, Math. Oper. Res..

[16]  H. P. Young,et al.  Progressive Taxation and Equal Sacrifice , 1990 .