The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery

Prior studies have suggested that biomodels enhance patient education, preoperative planning and intra-operative stereotaxy; however, the usefulness of biomodels compared to regular imaging modalities such as X-ray, CT and MR has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the surgeon’s perceptions on the usefulness of biomodels compared to standard visualisation modalities for preoperative planning and intra-operative anatomical reference. Physical biomodels were manufactured for a series of 26 consecutive patients with complex spinal pathologies using a stereolithographic technique based on CT data. The biomodels were used preoperatively for surgical planning and customising implants, and intra-operatively for anatomical reference. Following surgery, a detailed biomodel utility survey was completed by the surgeons, and informal telephone interviews were conducted with patients. Using biomodels, 21 deformity and 5 tumour cases were performed. Surgeons stated that the anatomical details were better visible on the biomodel than on other imaging modalities in 65% of cases, and exclusively visible on the biomodel in 11% of cases. Preoperative use of the biomodel led to a different decision regarding the choice of osteosynthetic materials used in 52% of cases, and the implantation site of osteosynthetic material in 74% of cases. Surgeons reported that the use of biomodels reduced operating time by a mean of 8% in tumour patients and 22% in deformity procedures. This study supports biomodelling as a useful, and sometimes essential tool in the armamentarium of imaging techniques used for complex spinal surgery.

[1]  P. D'urso,et al.  Biomodel-guided stereotaxy. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Paul S D'Urso,et al.  Biomodeling as an Aid to Spinal Instrumentation , 2004, Spine.

[3]  E. Fogarty,et al.  Kyphectomy in Children With Myelomeningocele: A Long-Term Outcome Study , 2004, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[4]  J A Hodak,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertebral column pathological conditions. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[5]  S. Lohfeld,et al.  Biomodels of Bone: A Review , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  T. Smit,et al.  Polyurethane Real-Size Models Used in Planning Complex Spinal Surgery , 2001, Spine.

[7]  C. Hopf,et al.  Orthopedic and neurosurgical treatment of severe kyphosis in myelomeningocele , 1999, Neurosurgical Review.

[8]  P. D'urso,et al.  Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a prospective trial. , 1999, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[9]  Timothy M. Barker,et al.  Stereolithographic biomodelling in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: A prospective trial , 1999 .

[10]  P. D'urso,et al.  Spinal biomodeling. , 1999, Spine.

[11]  A. Gmitro,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic reformation of the spine, skull, and brain from axial images. , 1986, Neurosurgery.

[12]  T M Barker,et al.  Integration of 3-D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models. , 1993, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[13]  L Bonnier,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction in routine computerized tomography of the skull and spine. Experience based on 161 cases. , 1991, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.