The importance of proper model assumption in bayesian phylogenetics.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. S. Rogers,et al. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[2] N. Goldman,et al. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[3] D. Hillis,et al. BEST‐FIT MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD MODELS FOR PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE: EMPIRICAL TESTS WITH KNOWN PHYLOGENIES , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[4] S. Tavaré. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences , 1986 .
[5] Antonis Rokas,et al. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[6] S. Muse,et al. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[7] Andrew Rambaut,et al. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[8] P. Lewis,et al. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[9] N. Goldman,et al. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[10] K. Crandall,et al. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. , 2001, Systematic biology.
[11] S. Muse. Evolutionary analyses of DNA sequences subject to constraints of secondary structure. , 1995, Genetics.
[12] M. Gouy,et al. Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a nonhomogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[13] D Penny,et al. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] J. Huelsenbeck,et al. A compound poisson process for relaxing the molecular clock. , 2000, Genetics.
[15] Z. Yang,et al. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.
[16] G. B. Golding,et al. Estimates of DNA and protein sequence divergence: an examination of some assumptions. , 1983, Molecular biology and evolution.
[17] E. Tillier,et al. High apparent rate of simultaneous compensatory base-pair substitutions in ribosomal RNA. , 1998, Genetics.
[18] A. Halpern,et al. Evolutionary distances for protein-coding sequences: modeling site-specific residue frequencies. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[19] P. J. Mason,et al. Comparison of models , 1996 .
[20] J. Felsenstein,et al. A Hidden Markov Model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[21] J. Felsenstein,et al. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[22] J. Oliver,et al. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[23] Nick Goldman,et al. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution , 1993, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[24] Derrick J. Zwickl,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[25] W. Li,et al. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[26] D. Swofford,et al. Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? , 2001, Systematic biology.
[27] John P. Huelsenbeck,et al. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..
[28] Michael J. Sanderson,et al. A Nonparametric Approach to Estimating Divergence Times in the Absence of Rate Constancy , 1997 .
[29] D. Balding,et al. Models of sequence evolution for DNA sequences containing gaps. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.
[30] Zaid Abdo,et al. Performance-based selection of likelihood models for phylogeny estimation. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[31] J. Felsenstein. Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .
[32] László A. Székely,et al. A complete family of phylogenetic invariants for any number of taxa under Kimura's 3ST model , 1993 .
[33] A. Lemmon,et al. The metapopulation genetic algorithm: An efficient solution for the problem of large phylogeny estimation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[34] W. Doolittle,et al. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[35] M. Kimura. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences , 1980, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[36] R. Nielsen,et al. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. , 1998, Genetics.
[37] Nina Amenta,et al. Case study: visualizing sets of evolutionary trees , 2002, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002. INFOVIS 2002..
[38] Jonathan P. Bollback,et al. Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny and Its Impact on Evolutionary Biology , 2001, Science.
[39] F. Lutzoni,et al. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.
[40] H. Munro,et al. Mammalian protein metabolism , 1964 .
[41] G. Schwarz. Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .
[42] T. Britton,et al. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[43] D. Robinson,et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .
[44] H. Kishino,et al. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[45] Jonathan P. Bollback,et al. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[46] G. Serio,et al. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[47] T. Jukes. CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .
[48] K. Holsinger,et al. Among-site rate variation and phylogenetic analysis of 12S rRNA in sigmodontine rodents. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.
[49] D. Cannatella,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the North American chorus frogs (Pseudacris: Hylidae). , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[50] ohn,et al. Potential Applications and Pitfalls of Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny , 2002 .
[51] J. Huelsenbeck,et al. SUCCESS OF PHYLOGENETIC METHODS IN THE FOUR-TAXON CASE , 1993 .
[52] M. Steel,et al. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[53] Masatoshi Nei,et al. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[54] H. Kishino,et al. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.
[55] W. Bruno,et al. Performance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.
[56] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .