The efficiency of using enamel matrix derivative in therapeutic approach of periodontal furcation defects of maxillary and mandibular molars

Periodontal disease is an inflammatory condition which affects the covering and support structures of the teeth and, if left untreated, leads to tooth loss. Resorption of the alveolar bone from bi- and trifurcation regions of a multirooted tooth due to the progression of a periodontal disease bears involvement furcation. The degree of furcation involvement is clinically assessed by changes in the vertical and horizontal plane at the root separation area. In the approach of the furcation treatment, the morphological and functional particularities of pluriradicular teeth must be considered and the current techniques look for solutions for the regeneration of the destroyed periodontal tissues. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has the role of stimulating healing processes through effects on various growth factors, cement formation, angiogenesis and are used single or in combination with bone graft substitute (BGS) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the complex treatment of periodontal disease. The present study follows PubMed publications on the efficiency of EMD in the treatment of pluriradicular tooth furcations. The findings are that there are not many studies in the usage of EMD associated with the treatment of furcations, but it is an important choice in the complex treatment of destructive periodontal disease, and further studies are needed to be done in periodontal regeneration.

[1]  I. Chapple Time to take gum disease seriously , 2022, British Dental Journal.

[2]  D. M. Soares,et al.  The use of enamel matrix derived in the treatment of class II furcation defects: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Australian dental journal.

[3]  E. Pellizzer,et al.  Clinical Evidence for Treatment of Class II Periodontal Furcation Defects. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2020, Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology.

[4]  R. Šadzevičienė,et al.  Enamel matrix derivate induces periodontal regeneration by activating growth factors: A review. , 2020, Stomatologija.

[5]  L. Tayebi,et al.  Using Enamel Matrix Derivative to Improve Treatment Efficacy in Periodontal Furcation Defects , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[6]  M. Newman,et al.  Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology , 2018 .

[7]  Purnima S. Kumar,et al.  Furcation Therapy With Enamel Matrix Derivative: Effects on the Subgingival Microbiome , 2017, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  R. Miron,et al.  Effects of EMD liquid (Osteogain) on periodontal healing in class III furcation defects in monkeys , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  M. Casati,et al.  Enamel matrix protein derivative and/or synthetic bone substitute for the treatment of mandibular class II buccal furcation defects. A 12-month randomized clinical trial , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[10]  H. Luder Malformations of the tooth root in humans , 2015, Front. Physiol..

[11]  M. Casati,et al.  Enamel matrix protein derivative plus synthetic bone substitute for the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects: a case series. , 2015, Quintessence international.

[12]  Vikas Deo,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative, bone grafts, and membrane in the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects. , 2013, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[13]  M. Casati,et al.  Hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate and enamel matrix derivative for treatment of proximal class II furcation defects: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  C. Mazzotti,et al.  A novel surgical-prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  A. B. Novaes,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative and transforming growth factor-beta1 in Class III furcation defects. A histomorphometric study in dogs. , 2012, Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology.

[16]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in reconstructive periodontal therapy: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  M. Dard,et al.  Regenerative wound healing in acute degree III mandibular defects in dogs. , 2012, Quintessence international.

[18]  D. Carnes,et al.  Angiogenic activity of an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and EMD-derived proteins: an experimental study in mice. , 2011, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative proteins for the treatment of proximal class II furcation involvements: a prospective 24-month randomized clinical trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  F. V. Ribeiro,et al.  Influence of anatomic features on the effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative proteins in the treatment of proximal Class II furcation involvements. , 2009, Quintessence international.

[21]  Xiaolin Tang,et al.  [Clinical and radiographic evaluation of class III furcation defects in the treatment using autogenous periodontal ligament cells with or without enamel matrix derivatives]. , 2009, Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences.

[22]  L. Trombelli,et al.  Clinical outcomes with bioactive agents alone or in combination with grafting or guided tissue regeneration. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  A double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of enamel matrix derivative proteins for the treatment of proximal class-II furcation involvements. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  F. Romano,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of enamel matrix proteins and autologous bone graft in the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects: a series of 11 patients. , 2007, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[25]  M. Chitsazi,et al.  Efficacy of open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivatives in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation involvement , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[26]  E. Reich,et al.  A randomized clinical multicentre trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part III: patient factors and treatment outcome. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[27]  M. McGuire,et al.  Application of periodontal tissue engineering using enamel matrix derivative and a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute to stimulate periodontal wound healing in Class III furcation defects. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[28]  J. Cirelli,et al.  Enamel matrix proteins associated with GTR and bioactive glass in the treatment of class III furcation in dogs. , 2005, Brazilian oral research.

[29]  P. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Comparative study of enamel matrix derivative with or without GTR in the treatment of class II furcation lesions in dogs. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[30]  R. Bödeker,et al.  A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part II: secondary outcomes. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  T. Karring,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative and a bioresorbable membrane in the treatment of degree III mandibular furcation involvement: a series of nine patients. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[32]  R. Bödeker,et al.  A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal Class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part I: Study design and results for primary outcomes. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[33]  T. Karring,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation involvement: a 36-month case series. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[34]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Regenerative materials: an overview. , 2000, The Alpha omegan.

[35]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Periodontal regeneration. , 1993, Periodontology 2000.

[36]  J. Agustín Zerón [Glossary of periodontal terms]. , 1990, Revista ADM.

[37]  L. Tronstad,et al.  Root resorption--etiology, terminology and clinical manifestations. , 1988, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[38]  J. Wennström,et al.  Furcation topography of the maxillary and mandibular first molars. , 1988, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[39]  J. Andreasen Challenges in clinical dental traumatology. , 1985, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[40]  D. Cochran,et al.  Emdogain in regenerative periodontal therapy . A review of the literature , 2022 .