The efficiency of using enamel matrix derivative in therapeutic approach of periodontal furcation defects of maxillary and mandibular molars
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] I. Chapple. Time to take gum disease seriously , 2022, British Dental Journal.
[2] D. M. Soares,et al. The use of enamel matrix derived in the treatment of class II furcation defects: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Australian dental journal.
[3] E. Pellizzer,et al. Clinical Evidence for Treatment of Class II Periodontal Furcation Defects. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2020, Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology.
[4] R. Šadzevičienė,et al. Enamel matrix derivate induces periodontal regeneration by activating growth factors: A review. , 2020, Stomatologija.
[5] L. Tayebi,et al. Using Enamel Matrix Derivative to Improve Treatment Efficacy in Periodontal Furcation Defects , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.
[6] M. Newman,et al. Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology , 2018 .
[7] Purnima S. Kumar,et al. Furcation Therapy With Enamel Matrix Derivative: Effects on the Subgingival Microbiome , 2017, Journal of periodontology.
[8] R. Miron,et al. Effects of EMD liquid (Osteogain) on periodontal healing in class III furcation defects in monkeys , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[9] M. Casati,et al. Enamel matrix protein derivative and/or synthetic bone substitute for the treatment of mandibular class II buccal furcation defects. A 12-month randomized clinical trial , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[10] H. Luder. Malformations of the tooth root in humans , 2015, Front. Physiol..
[11] M. Casati,et al. Enamel matrix protein derivative plus synthetic bone substitute for the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects: a case series. , 2015, Quintessence international.
[12] Vikas Deo,et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative, bone grafts, and membrane in the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects. , 2013, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[13] M. Casati,et al. Hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate and enamel matrix derivative for treatment of proximal class II furcation defects: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[14] C. Mazzotti,et al. A novel surgical-prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.
[15] A. B. Novaes,et al. Enamel matrix derivative and transforming growth factor-beta1 in Class III furcation defects. A histomorphometric study in dogs. , 2012, Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology.
[16] M. Quirynen,et al. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in reconstructive periodontal therapy: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of periodontology.
[17] M. Dard,et al. Regenerative wound healing in acute degree III mandibular defects in dogs. , 2012, Quintessence international.
[18] D. Carnes,et al. Angiogenic activity of an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and EMD-derived proteins: an experimental study in mice. , 2011, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[19] G. Ambrosano,et al. Enamel matrix derivative proteins for the treatment of proximal class II furcation involvements: a prospective 24-month randomized clinical trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[20] F. V. Ribeiro,et al. Influence of anatomic features on the effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative proteins in the treatment of proximal Class II furcation involvements. , 2009, Quintessence international.
[21] Xiaolin Tang,et al. [Clinical and radiographic evaluation of class III furcation defects in the treatment using autogenous periodontal ligament cells with or without enamel matrix derivatives]. , 2009, Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences.
[22] L. Trombelli,et al. Clinical outcomes with bioactive agents alone or in combination with grafting or guided tissue regeneration. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[23] G. Ambrosano,et al. A double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of enamel matrix derivative proteins for the treatment of proximal class-II furcation involvements. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[24] F. Romano,et al. Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of enamel matrix proteins and autologous bone graft in the treatment of mandibular Class II furcation defects: a series of 11 patients. , 2007, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[25] M. Chitsazi,et al. Efficacy of open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivatives in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation involvement , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.
[26] E. Reich,et al. A randomized clinical multicentre trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part III: patient factors and treatment outcome. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[27] M. McGuire,et al. Application of periodontal tissue engineering using enamel matrix derivative and a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute to stimulate periodontal wound healing in Class III furcation defects. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.
[28] J. Cirelli,et al. Enamel matrix proteins associated with GTR and bioactive glass in the treatment of class III furcation in dogs. , 2005, Brazilian oral research.
[29] P. D. de Oliveira,et al. Comparative study of enamel matrix derivative with or without GTR in the treatment of class II furcation lesions in dogs. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[30] R. Bödeker,et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part II: secondary outcomes. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.
[31] T. Karring,et al. Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative and a bioresorbable membrane in the treatment of degree III mandibular furcation involvement: a series of nine patients. , 2004, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[32] R. Bödeker,et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal Class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part I: Study design and results for primary outcomes. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.
[33] T. Karring,et al. Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation involvement: a 36-month case series. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.
[34] J. Mellonig,et al. Regenerative materials: an overview. , 2000, The Alpha omegan.
[35] Hom-lay Wang,et al. Periodontal regeneration. , 1993, Periodontology 2000.
[36] J. Agustín Zerón. [Glossary of periodontal terms]. , 1990, Revista ADM.
[37] L. Tronstad,et al. Root resorption--etiology, terminology and clinical manifestations. , 1988, Endodontics & dental traumatology.
[38] J. Wennström,et al. Furcation topography of the maxillary and mandibular first molars. , 1988, Journal of clinical periodontology.
[39] J. Andreasen. Challenges in clinical dental traumatology. , 1985, Endodontics & dental traumatology.
[40] D. Cochran,et al. Emdogain in regenerative periodontal therapy . A review of the literature , 2022 .