Learning through Interactions: Improving Project Management through Communities of Practice

Communities of practice are a possible mechanism for improving knowledge sharing among project managers, both within and between organizations. Based on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, we theorize a model of participation intensity in communities of practice by project managers and explore the use of Web 2.0 technologies to increase this participation. Using structural equation modeling, we test the research model and find that the factors of reputation, enjoyment, and management support impact the participation intensity of project managers in communities of practice. However, we do not find support for the impact of Web 2.0 technologies on participation intensity. This study provides evidence that participation in communities of practice can result in individual benefits for the project manager, as well as in more far-reaching organizational benefits.

[1]  Dag Wollebaek,et al.  Does Participation in Voluntary Associations Contribute to Social Capital? The Impact of Intensity, Scope, and Type , 2002 .

[2]  Nicholas M. Allix Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .

[3]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[4]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Critical factors in successful project implementation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Conan C. Albrecht,et al.  Motivating Content Contributions to Online Communities: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[7]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[8]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[9]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Inter-Team Coordination Patterns and Outcomes in Multi-Team Projects , 2013 .

[10]  H. Saint‐Onge,et al.  Leveraging Communities of Practice for Strategic Advantage , 2002 .

[11]  Chang-Hyun Jin Social Capital Index , 2015 .

[12]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[13]  Mian M. Ajmal,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Project-Based Organizations: An Organizational Culture Perspective , 2008 .

[14]  Karin Garrety,et al.  Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects , 2004 .

[15]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[16]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Chivonne Algeo,et al.  Exploring Project Knowledge Acquisition and Exchange through Action Research , 2014 .

[19]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[20]  Chris Blackmore,et al.  Landscapes of practices, social learning systems and rural innovation. , 2012 .

[21]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[22]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[24]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[25]  S. M. Arnsten Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[27]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[28]  L. B. Jepsen Complex New Product Development Projects: How the Project Manager's Information Sharing with Core Actors Changes over Time , 2013 .

[29]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[30]  Andrew Cox,et al.  What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[32]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[33]  Monique Aubry,et al.  Organisational project management: An historical approach to the study of PMOs , 2008 .

[34]  R MillenDavid,et al.  Understanding the benefit and costs of communities of practice , 2002 .

[35]  M. Vartiainen,et al.  Characteristics of knowledge sharing communities in project organizations , 2005 .

[36]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: the Career of a Concept , 2010 .

[37]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[39]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[40]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[41]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[42]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[43]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[44]  Joseph Lampel,et al.  The Role of Status-Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Limits of Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[46]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.