Interactive Democracy: New Challenges for Social Choice Theory

Interactive Democracy (aka e-democracy or digital democracy) is an umbrella term that encompasses a variety of approaches to make collective decision making processes more engaging and responsive. A common goal of these approaches is to utilize modern information technology—in particular, the Internet—in order to enable more interactive decision making processes. An integral part of many interactive democracy proposals are online decision platforms that provide much more flexibility and interaction possibilities than traditional democratic systems. This is achieved by embracing the novel paradigm of delegative voting, often referred to as liquid democracy, which aims to reconcile the idealistic appeal of direct democracy with the practicality of representative democracy. The successful design of interactive democracy systems presents a multidisciplinary research challenge; one important aspect concerns the elicitation and aggregation of preferences. In this article, I argue that the emergence of online decision platforms and other interactive democracy systems leads to new challenges for social choice theory.

[1]  John R. Chamberlin,et al.  Representative Deliberations and Representative Decisions: Proportional Representation and the Borda Rule , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Handbook of Computational Social Choice , 2016 .

[3]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  The Fluid Mechanics of Liquid Democracy , 2018, WINE.

[4]  Christian Blum,et al.  Liquid Democracy : Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives , 2016 .

[5]  Ashish Goel,et al.  Knapsack Voting for Participatory Budgeting , 2019, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[6]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Crowdsourcing Societal Tradeoffs , 2015, AAMAS.

[7]  Dan Alger,et al.  Voting by proxy , 2006 .

[8]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Preference Elicitation For Participatory Budgeting , 2017, AAAI.

[9]  S. Sánchez-Pagés,et al.  A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre , 2009 .

[10]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Proxy Voting for Better Outcomes , 2016, AAMAS.

[11]  Michael Margolis,et al.  The Prospect of Internet Democracy , 2009 .

[12]  Y. Cabannes Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy , 2004 .

[13]  Nimrod Talmon,et al.  Proportionally Representative Participatory Budgeting: Axioms and Algorithms , 2017, AAMAS.

[14]  Guido Boella,et al.  WeGovNow: A Map Based Platform to Engage the Local Civic Society , 2018, WWW.

[15]  Nimrod Talmon,et al.  Pairwise Liquid Democracy , 2018, IJCAI.

[16]  Haris Aziz,et al.  Justified representation in approval-based committee voting , 2014, Social Choice and Welfare.

[17]  James C. Miller A program for direct and proxy voting in the legislative process , 1969 .

[18]  Lirong Xia,et al.  Voting in Combinatorial Domains , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[19]  Edith Elkind,et al.  Rationalizations of Voting Rules , 2016, Handbook of Computational Social Choice.

[20]  P. Mancini Why it is time to redesign our political system , 2015 .

[21]  Kamesh Munagala,et al.  The Core of the Participatory Budgeting Problem , 2016, WINE.

[22]  Edith Elkind,et al.  Proportional Rankings , 2016, IJCAI.

[23]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Spliddit: unleashing fair division algorithms , 2015, SECO.

[24]  Bingsheng Zhang,et al.  Brief Announcement: Statement Voting and Liquid Democracy , 2017, PODC.

[25]  P. Fishburn Paradoxes of Voting , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[26]  Barry N. Hague,et al.  Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age , 2005 .

[27]  Markus Brill,et al.  Interactive Democracy , 2018, AAMAS.

[28]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Liquid Democracy: An Algorithmic Perspective , 2018, AAAI.

[29]  Ehud Shapiro,et al.  Point , 2018, Communications of the ACM.

[30]  Davide Grossi,et al.  Binary Voting with Delegable Proxy: An Analysis of Liquid Democracy , 2017, TARK.

[31]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Voting Behaviour and Power in Online Democracy: A Study of LiquidFeedback in Germany's Pirate Party , 2015, ICWSM.

[32]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Bidding Languages for Combinatorial Auctions , 2005 .

[33]  Nimrod Talmon,et al.  A Participatory Democratic Budgeting Algorithm. , 2018 .

[34]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[35]  Burt L. Monroe,et al.  Fully Proportional Representation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[36]  James Green-Armytage Direct voting and proxy voting , 2015 .