Accepting personality test feedback: A review of the Barnum effect

This article attempts a comprehensive and critical review of the by-now fairly extensive literature on the Barnum effect—the approval/acceptance by subjects of bogus personality interpretations supposedly derived from standard tests. Since the last major review eight years ago various methodological extensions have occurred and various rival hypotheses for established findings have been proposed. The present review is divided into three major sections: client and clinician characteristics; feedback statements and test format; and implications for personality assessment and measurement. Nearly 50 studies on the acceptance of personality interpretations are systematically reviewed and criticized.

[1]  R. L. Greene.  Student Acceptance of Generalized Personality Interpretations: A Reexamination. , 1977 .

[2]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  Wanted—a good cook-book. , 1956 .

[3]  L. Bradley,et al.  Effects of "favorability" and type of assessment device upon acceptance of general personality interpretations. , 1980, Journal of personality assessment.

[4]  R. R. Dies.  Personal gullibility or pseudodiagnosis: a further test of the "fallacy of personal validation". , 1972, Journal of clinical psychology.

[5]  C. Layne.  Relationship between the "Barnum effect" and personality inventory responses. , 1978, Journal of clinical psychology.

[6]  R. L. Greene.  Can clients provide valuable feedback to clinicians about their personality interpretations? Greene replies. , 1978 .

[7]  R. Dana,et al.  Feedback of client-relevant information and clinical practice. , 1976, Journal of personality assessment.

[8]  A. Furnham,et al.  The mote in thy brother's eye, and the beam in thine own: Predicting one's own and others' personality test scores , 1983 .

[9]  A. Furnham,et al.  Type A behaviour pattern, the recall of positive personality information and self-evaluations. , 1986, The British journal of medical psychology.

[10]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Rowan Bayne.  Interpretations and uses of research on ‘Barnum’ personality statements , 1980 .

[12]  R. Dana,et al.  Barnum Statements in Reports of Psychological Assessment , 1979 .

[13]  Catherine S. Fichten,et al.  Popular horoscopes and the "Barnum effect." , 1983 .

[14]  R. L. Greene,et al.  Students' perception of actual, trivial, and inaccurate personality feedback. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[15]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Effects of enhanced psychological test feedback on treatment outcome: therapeutic implications of the Barnum effect. , 1979, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  C. Layne.  The Barnum effect: Rationality versus gullibility? , 1979 .

[17]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  M. R. Merrens,et al.  Length of personality inventory and the evaluation of a generalized personality interpretation. , 1973, Journal of personality assessment.

[19]  C. R. Snyder.  Why horoscopes are true: The effects of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations , 1974 .

[20]  N. A. Carrier.  Need correlates of "gullibility". , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[21]  E. J. Manning.  “Personal Validation:” Replication of Forer's Study , 1968, Psychological reports.

[22]  R. L. Greene,et al.  Another look at personal validation. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[23]  B. R. Forer,et al.  The fallacy of personal validation; a classroom demonstration of gullibility. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[24]  C. Layne,et al.  How and why people accept personality feedback. , 1980, Journal of personality assessment.

[25]  V. M. Dmitruk,et al.  Personal validation: some empirical and ethical considerations. , 1977, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  J. Baillargeon,et al.  Barnum meets the computer: a critical test. , 1984, Journal of Personality Assessment.

[27]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Acceptance of personality interpretations: the "Barnum Effect" and beyond. , 1977, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[28]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Does insecurity breed acceptance? Effects of trait and situational insecurity on acceptance of positive and negative diagnostic feedback. , 1977 .

[29]  K. Lattal,et al.  Student "gullibility": a systematic replication. , 1967, The Journal of psychology.

[30]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Effects of "favorability", modality, and relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[31]  M. R. Merrens,et al.  Acceptance of Generalized versus “Bona Fide” Personality Interpretation , 1970, Psychological reports.

[32]  E. Pattishall,et al.  An experiment in universal and personal validation. , 1960, Psychiatry.

[33]  Ross Stagner,et al.  The Gullibility of Personnel Managers , 1958 .

[34]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures. , 1976, Journal of clinical psychology.

[35]  J. O’dell.  P. T. Barnum explores the computer. , 1972 .

[36]  G. Rosen.  Effects of source prestige on subjects' acceptance of the Barnum effect: psychologist versus astrologer. , 1975, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

[37]  Roger E. Ulrich,et al.  Student Acceptance of Generalized Personality Interpretations , 1963 .

[38]  D. L. Mosher.  Approval Motive and Acceptance of “Fake” Personality Test Interpretations which Differ in Favorability , 1965, Psychological reports.

[39]  V. M. Dmitruk,et al.  The "Barnum effect" and acceptance of negative personal evaluation. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[40]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Judging personality assessments: putting the Barnum report in perspective. , 1976, Journal of personality assessment.

[41]  G. Tyson.  People who consult astrologers: A profile , 1982 .

[42]  D. E. Jackson.  The effect of test taking on acceptance of bogus personality statements. , 1978, Journal of clinical psychology.

[43]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Can clients provide valuable feedback to clinicians about their personality interpretations? A reply to Greene. , 1978 .

[44]  A. Furnham.  Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation , 1986 .

[45]  P. A. Marks,et al.  On the Barnum effect , 1962 .

[46]  I. W. Kelly,et al.  The ‘Barnum Effect’ in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature , 1985 .

[47]  P. Weisberg.  Student Acceptance of Bogus Personality Interpretations Differing in Level of Social Desirability , 1970, Psychological reports.

[48]  L. Bradley,et al.  Situational determinants of personal validation of general personality interpretations. , 1974, Journal of personality assessment.

[49]  R. L. Greene,et al.  The universality of generalized personality statements. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[50]  N. Sundberg,et al.  The acceptability of "fake" versus "bona fide" personality test interpretations. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[51]  D. Baucom,et al.  Students' acceptance of high and low generalized personality interpretations , 1980, Journal of Clinical Psychology.

[52]  C. Layne,et al.  Inventory responding as a model of people's acceptance of personality interpretations. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[53]  M. R. Merrens,et al.  Student Evaluation of Generalized Personality Interpretations as a Function of Method of Assessment. , 1971 .

[54]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. , 1972, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[55]  G. Tyson.  Why people perceive horoscopes as being true: A review. , 1982 .