Beat Processing Is Pre-Attentive for Metrically Simple Rhythms with Clear Accents: An ERP Study

The perception of a regular beat is fundamental to music processing. Here we examine whether the detection of a regular beat is pre-attentive for metrically simple, acoustically varying stimuli using the mismatch negativity (MMN), an ERP response elicited by violations of acoustic regularity irrespective of whether subjects are attending to the stimuli. Both musicians and non-musicians were presented with a varying rhythm with a clear accent structure in which occasionally a sound was omitted. We compared the MMN response to the omission of identical sounds in different metrical positions. Most importantly, we found that omissions in strong metrical positions, on the beat, elicited higher amplitude MMN responses than omissions in weak metrical positions, not on the beat. This suggests that the detection of a beat is pre-attentive when highly beat inducing stimuli are used. No effects of musical expertise were found. Our results suggest that for metrically simple rhythms with clear accents beat processing does not require attention or musical expertise. In addition, we discuss how the use of acoustically varying stimuli may influence ERP results when studying beat processing.

[1]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Neural responses to sounds presented on and off the beat of ecologically valid music , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[2]  D. Schön,et al.  Rhythm implicitly affects temporal orienting of attention across modalities. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Gábor P. Háden,et al.  Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Detect Rhythmic Groups in Music, but Not the Beat , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Cross-frequency interaction of the eye-movement related LFP signals in V1 of freely viewing monkeys , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[5]  H. Honing.  Without it no music: beat induction as a fundamental musical trait , 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  B. Ross,et al.  Internalized Timing of Isochronous Sounds Is Represented in Neuromagnetic Beta Oscillations , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Isabelle Peretz,et al.  Tagging the Neuronal Entrainment to Beat and Meter , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  S. Kotz,et al.  Temporal regularity effects on pre-attentive and attentive processing of deviance , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[9]  Edward W. Large,et al.  Neural Responses to Complex Auditory Rhythms: The Role of Attending , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[10]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Refinement of metre perception – training increases hierarchical metre processing , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Horizontal Information Drives the Behavioral Signatures of Face Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[12]  I. Winkler,et al.  I Heard That Coming: Event-Related Potential Evidence for Stimulus-Driven Prediction in the Auditory System , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Jessica A. Grahn,et al.  Feeling the Beat: Premotor and Striatal Interactions in Musicians and Nonmusicians during Beat Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Sibylle C. Herholz,et al.  Looking for a pattern: An MEG study on the abstract mismatch negativity in musicians and nonmusicians , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[15]  Gábor P. Háden,et al.  Probing Attentive and Preattentive Emergent Meter in Adult Listeners without Extensive Music Training , 2009 .

[16]  Esther Ziegler,et al.  Early electrophysiological correlates of meter and rhythm processing in music perception , 2009, Cortex.

[17]  Simon Grondin,et al.  Psychology of Time , 2008 .

[18]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Moving on Time: Brain Network for Auditory-Motor Synchronization is Modulated by Rhythm Complexity and Musical Training , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  E. Sussman.  A New View on the MMN and Attention Debate The Role of Context in Processing Auditory Events , 2007 .

[21]  I. Winkler.  Interpreting the Mismatch Negativity , 2007 .

[22]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  A. Penel.  Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter. , 2006 .

[24]  J. Snyder,et al.  Gamma-band activity reflects the metric structure of rhythmic tone sequences. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  I. Winkler,et al.  Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity--a mismatch negativity study comparing musicians and non-musicians. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Musical Training Enhances Automatic Encoding of Melodic Contour and Interval Structure , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Mari Tervaniemi,et al.  Grouping of Sequential SoundsAn Event-Related Potential Study Comparing Musicians and Nonmusicians , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Sabri,et al.  Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Thomas Baer,et al.  A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness , 1997 .

[33]  T. Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. II. Simulations and measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory , 1994, Nature.

[35]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  The development and decline of forward masking , 1988, Hearing Research.

[36]  Grosvenor W. Cooper,et al.  The Rhythmic Structure of Music , 1971 .

[37]  Fleur L. Bouwer,et al.  Perceiving temporal regularity in music: the role of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) in probing beat perception. , 2014, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[38]  Hugo Merchant,et al.  Neurobiology of Interval Timing , 2014, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[39]  Henkjan Honing,et al.  Structure and Interpretation of Rhythm in Music , 2013 .

[40]  J. Polich.  Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[41]  E. Large.  Resonating to Musical Rhythm : Theory and Experiment , 2008 .

[42]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[43]  E. Zwicker.  Dependence of post-masking on masker duration and its relation to temporal effects in loudness. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  I. Peretz,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Selective Neuronal Entrainment to the Beat and Meter Embedded in a Musical Rhythm , 2022 .