Biofilm Adhesion and Micromorphology Analysis after Professional Oral Hygiene Procedures on CAD/CAM Milled and Veneered Zirconia Restorations: In Vitro Study

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface texture and biofilm adhesion of veneered or CAD/CAM milled zirconia (partially stabilized with yttrium) after professional oral hygiene procedures. The samples (4 × 4 mm, thickness 2 mm; n  =  72) were separated from zirconia blanks (3Y-TZP-LA). One group was veenered with ceramics, and the other group of samples was CAD/CAM milled. Each group had two subgroups: polished and glazed. The samples were subjected to simulated strokes of professional brushing using abrasive paste and ultrasonic scaling. The parameters of surface micromorphology and receptivity to biofilm were calculated before and after simulating the given methods of the professional maintenance of oral hygiene. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate zirconia surface properties. Microbial (bacterial/fungal) species (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus sanguinis and Candida albicans) were used and cultured on respective sterilized zirconia surfaces. Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were used to quantify the amount of biofilm formation on zirconia samples surfaces. Results: The SEM analysis showed the greatest change in surface microtopography after the use of ultrasonic scaling on glazed zirconia samples. Less formation of colonies on the surfaces of CAD/CAM milled zirconia restorations was observed. Conclusion: Routine methods of oral hygiene professional maintenance can damage the surfaces of glazed zirconia restorations.

[1]  A. Barone,et al.  The Use of Zirconia for Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Narrative Review , 2023, Dental journal.

[2]  Allan Oliveira da Silva,et al.  Wear Behavior of Monolithic Zirconia after Staining, Glazing, and Polishing Opposing Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study , 2023, Coatings.

[3]  M. Bottino,et al.  Dental Ceramics: Fabrication Methods and Aesthetic Characterization , 2022, Coatings.

[4]  V. Lazić,et al.  Unraveling the Antibiofilm Activity of a New Nanogold Resin for Dentures and Epithesis , 2022, Pharmaceutics.

[5]  Hidekazu Takahashi,et al.  Effect of toothbrushing on the optical properties and surface roughness of extrinsically stained high-translucency zirconia , 2021, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[6]  A. H. Veríssimo,et al.  Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and aging on topography, C. albicans adherence, and flexural strength of ultra-translucent zirconia: an in situ study , 2021, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  Simone Kreve,et al.  Effect of surface properties of ceramic materials on bacterial adhesion: A systematic review. , 2021, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[8]  J. Reunanen,et al.  Surface Roughness and Streptococcus mutans Adhesion on Metallic and Ceramic Fixed Prosthodontic Materials after Scaling , 2021, Materials.

[9]  W. Arnold,et al.  Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity , 2020, BMC oral health.

[10]  J. Roulet,et al.  Time-lasting ceramic stains and glaze: A toothbrush simulation study. , 2020, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[11]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  In vitro adherence of Candida albicans to zirconia surfaces. , 2020, Oral diseases.

[12]  Liyu Chen,et al.  Comparison of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on zirconia fabricated by two different approaches: an in vitro and in vivo study , 2020 .

[13]  J. Fischer,et al.  Influence of different zirconia surface treatments on biofilm formation in vitro and in situ , 2019, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  T. Campos,et al.  The Wear Performance of Glazed and Polished Full Contour Zirconia. , 2019, Brazilian dental journal.

[15]  Sunghuen Kim,et al.  Effects of ultrasonic scaling on the optical properties and surface characteristics of highly translucent CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials: An in vitro study , 2019, Ceramics International.

[16]  T. Mücke,et al.  Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results , 2019, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[17]  Su-Hyung Hong,et al.  Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation , 2019, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[18]  Y. Niwano,et al.  Surface properties of dental zirconia ceramics affected by ultrasonic scaling and low-temperature degradation , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  A. Correia,et al.  Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Tooth-Supported Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review. , 2018, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[20]  M. Bottino,et al.  Monolithic Ceramics: Effect of Finishing Techniques on Surface Properties, Bacterial Adhesion and Cell Viability. , 2018, Operative dentistry.

[21]  Alvin G. Wee,et al.  Effect of brushing and thermocycling on the shade and surface roughness of CAD‐CAM ceramic restorations , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  J. Matinlinna,et al.  Influence of Grit-Blasting and Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Treatment on Surface Characteristics and Biofilm Formation on Zirconia , 2017 .

[23]  Hyung-In Yoon,et al.  Surface changes of metal alloys and high-strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing , 2017, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[24]  C. B. Magalhães,et al.  Periodontal-disease-associated biofilm: A reservoir for pathogens of medical importance. , 2016, Microbial pathogenesis.

[25]  J. Shibli,et al.  Oral Streptococci Biofilm Formation on Different Implant Surface Topographies , 2015, BioMed research international.

[26]  V. Bakken,et al.  Biofilm and Dental Biomaterials , 2015, Materials.

[27]  H. Koo,et al.  Effects of Material Properties on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation , 2015, Journal of dental research.

[28]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Initial Bacterial Adhesion on Different Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia Implant Surfaces in Vitro , 2013, Materials.

[29]  Urs Brugger,et al.  Automated Counting of Bacterial Colony Forming Units on Agar Plates , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  Jung-Suk Han,et al.  Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro , 2011, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[31]  N. Lang,et al.  Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. , 2010, Periodontology 2000.

[32]  M. Hisbergues,et al.  Zirconia: Established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[33]  J. Beck,et al.  Periodontal disease at the biofilm-gingival interface. , 2007, Journal of periodontology.

[34]  S. Socransky,et al.  Identification of early microbial colonizers in human dental biofilm , 2004, Journal of applied microbiology.

[35]  A. Heinecke,et al.  A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[36]  Javier Montero,et al.  Zirconia implant abutments: a review. , 2011, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[37]  R. Kolter,et al.  Biofilm formation as microbial development. , 2000, Annual review of microbiology.

[38]  C. Piconi,et al.  Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. , 1999, Biomaterials.