Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence.

In the course of an adaptive radiation, the evolution of niche parameters is of particular interest for understanding modes of speciation and the consequences for coexistence of related species within communities. We pose a general question: In the course of an evolutionary radiation, do traits related to within-community niche differences (alpha niche) evolve before or after differentiation of macrohabitat affinity or climatic tolerances (beta niche)? Here we introduce a new test to address this question, based on a modification of the method of independent contrasts. The divergence order test (DOT) is based on the average age of the nodes on a tree, weighted by the absolute magnitude of the contrast at each node for a particular trait. The comparison of these weighted averages reveals whether large divergences for one trait have occurred earlier or later in the course of diversification, relative to a second trait; significance is determined by bootstrapping from maximum-likelihood ancestral state reconstructions. The method is applied to the evolution of Ceanothus, a woody plant group in California, in which co-occurring species exhibit significant differences in a key leaf trait (specific leaf area) associated with contrasting physiological and life history strategies. Co-occurring species differ more for this trait than expected under a null model of community assembly. This alpha niche difference evolved early in the divergence of two major subclades within Ceanothus, whereas climatic distributions (beta niche traits) diversified later within each of the subclades. However, rapid evolution of climate parameters makes inferences of early divergence events highly uncertain, and differentiation of the beta niche might have taken place throughout the evolution of the group, without leaving a clear phylogenetic signal. Similar patterns observed in several plant and animal groups suggest that early divergence of alpha niche traits might be a common feature of niche evolution in many adaptive radiations.

[1]  Kevin McConway,et al.  Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. , 2006, Ecology.

[2]  J. Losos,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of the niche in lizards of the Anolis sagrei group. , 2006, Ecology.

[3]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  TESTING FOR DIFFERENT RATES OF CONTINUOUS TRAIT EVOLUTION USING LIKELIHOOD , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  K. McConway,et al.  Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Is there a cost to resprouting? Seedling growth rate and drought tolerance in sprouting and nonsprouting Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae). , 2005, American journal of botany.

[6]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Evolutionary Diversification of Continuous Traits: Phylogenetic Tests and Application to Seed Size in the California Flora , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[7]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Population dynamics and evolutionary processes: the manifold roles of habitat selection , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[8]  M. Cadotte.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[9]  C. Graham,et al.  INTEGRATING PHYLOGENETICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE MODELS TO EXPLORE SPECIATION MECHANISMS IN DENDROBATID FROGS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[11]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[13]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES OF CHAPARRAL SHRUBS IN RELATION TO SEASONAL WATER DEFICIT AND DISTURBANCE , 2004 .

[14]  J. Wiens.  SPECIATION AND ECOLOGY REVISITED: PHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISM AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  D. Levin.  Ecological Speciation: Crossing the Divide , 2004 .

[16]  J. Losos,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION IN HISPANIOLAN TRUNK-GROUND ANOLES (ANOLIS CYBOTES GROUP) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  D. Ackerly.  Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[18]  J. Streelman,et al.  The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation , 2003 .

[19]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  R8s: Inferring Absolute Rates of Molecular Evolution, Divergence times in the Absence of a Molecular Clock , 2003, Bioinform..

[20]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic repulsion in the assembly of Floridian oak communities , 2003 .

[21]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges , 2003 .

[22]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[23]  D. Swofford.  PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[24]  M. Sanderson.  Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities , 2001 .

[26]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Correlated evolution of chloroplast heat shock protein expression in closely related plant species. , 2001, American-Eurasian journal of botany.

[27]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[28]  H. Meyer.  Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic History of North American Vegetation , 2000 .

[29]  D. Ackerly.  TAXON SAMPLING, CORRELATED EVOLUTION, AND INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  Richard H. Ree,et al.  Homoplasy and Developmental Constraint: A Model and an Example from Plants1 , 2000 .

[31]  M. Taper,et al.  Interspecific Competition, Environmental Gradients, Gene Flow, and the Coevolution of Species' Borders , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS SUCCEED WHERE ANCESTOR RECONSTRUCTION FAILS IN A KNOWN BACTERIOPHAGE PHYLOGENY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  D. Soltis,et al.  Diversification of the North American shrub genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae): conflicting phylogenies from nuclear ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[34]  D. Schluter,et al.  The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2000 .

[35]  V. Sánchez‐Cordero,et al.  Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time , 1999, Science.

[36]  F. Ewers,et al.  Differential susceptibility to xylem cavitation among three pairs of Ceanothus species in the Transverse Mountain Ranges of southern California , 1999 .

[37]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  D. Schluter,et al.  LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evolution of a Species' Range , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[41]  A. Liston,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of the genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) using rbc L and ndh F sequences , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[42]  ECOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN THE OLD WORLD LEAF WARBLERS (GENUS PHYLLOSCOPUS): A PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVE , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[44]  Ramón Díaz-Uriarte,et al.  TESTING HYPOTHESES OF CORRELATED EVOLUTION USING PHYLOGENETICALLY INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS: SENSITIVITY TO DEVIATIONS FROM BROWNIAN MOTION , 1996 .

[45]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Shifts in Diversification Rate with the Origin of Angiosperms , 1994, Science.

[46]  J. C. Hickman,et al.  The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California , 1993 .

[47]  D. Ord,et al.  PAUP:Phylogenetic analysis using parsi-mony , 1993 .

[48]  T. Garland.  Rate Tests for Phenotypic Evolution Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[49]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[50]  T. Price,et al.  Evolution of ecological differences in the Old World leaf warblers , 1992, Nature.

[51]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[52]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and quantitative characters , 1988 .

[53]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[54]  S. Pickett,et al.  Organization of an Assemblage of Early Successional Species on a Soil Moisture Gradient , 1978 .

[55]  J. Keeley,et al.  Reproduction of Chaparral Shrubs After Fire: A Comparison of Sprouting and Seeding Strategies , 1978 .

[56]  J. Keeley.  Fire dependent reproductive strategies in Arctostaphylos and Ceanothus , 1977 .

[57]  I. Hiscock.  Communities and Ecosystems , 1970, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[58]  P. Wells.  THE RELATION BETWEEN MODE OF REPRODUCTION AND EXTENT OF SPECIATION IN WOODY GENERA OF THE CALIFORNIA CHAPARRAL , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  Patterns in the Balance of Nature , 1966 .

[60]  H. Hellmers,et al.  Root Systems of Some Chaparral Plants in Southern California , 1955 .

[61]  S. A. Barnett,et al.  The major features of evolution , 1955 .

[62]  C. Elton.  Competition and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1946 .

[63]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[64]  J. Schulte,et al.  Spurring plant diversification : Are floral nectar spurs a key innovation ? , 2022 .