Fuzzy Logic Models for the Meaning of Emotion Words

This paper presents two models that use interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FSs) for representing the meaning of words that refer to emotions. In the first model, the meaning of an emotion word is represented by IT2 FSs on valence, activation, and dominance scales. In the second model, the meaning of an emotion word is represented by answers to an open-ended set of questions from the game of Emotion Twenty Questions (EMO20Q). The notion of meaning in the two proposed models is made explicit using the Frege an framework of extensional and intensional components of meaning. Inter- and intra-subject uncertainty is captured by using IT2 FSs learned from interval approach surveys. Similarity and subsethood operators are used for comparing the meaning of pairs of words. For the first model, we apply similarity and subsethood operators for the task of translating one emotional vocabulary, represented as a computing with words (CWW) codebook, to another. This act of translation is shown to be an example of CWW that is extended to use the three scales of valence, activation, and dominance to represent a single variable. We experimentally evaluate the use of the first model for translations and mappings between vocabularies. Accuracy is high when using a small emotion vocabulary as an output, but performance decreases when the output vocabulary is larger. The second model was devised to deal with larger emotion vocabularies, but presents interesting technical challenges in that the set of scales underlying two different emotion words may not be the same. We evaluate the second model by comparing it with results from a single-slider survey. We discuss the theoretical insights that the two models allow and the advantages and disadvantages of each.

[1]  Abe Kazemzadeh,et al.  Using interval type-2 fuzzy logic to translate emotion words from Spanish to English , 2010, International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Encoding Words Into Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets Using an Interval Approach , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[4]  Carlos Busso,et al.  IEMOCAP: interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database , 2008, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[5]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems , 2000, Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ- IEEE 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37063).

[6]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Using interval type-2 fuzzy logic to analyze Turkish emotion words , 2012, Proceedings of The 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference.

[7]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  An interval type-2 fuzzy logic system to translate between emotion-related vocabularies , 2008, INTERSPEECH.

[8]  Thomas E. Forster Reasoning About Theoretical Entities , 2003, Advances in Logic.

[9]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems Made Simple , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Classification of sound clips by two schemes: Using onomatopoeia and semantic labels , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[11]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  FROM SEARCH ENGINES TO QUESTION-ANSWERING SYSTEMS – THE PROBLEMS OF WORLD KNOWLEDGE, RELEVANCE, DEDUCTION AND PRECISIATION , 2015 .

[12]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  The Linguistic Weighted Average , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[13]  L. F. Barrett Are Emotions Natural Kinds? , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  An Interval Approach to Fuzzistics for Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems Conference.

[15]  Amit Konar,et al.  Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Model for Emotion Recognition from Facial Expression , 2012, PerMIn.

[16]  D. R. Heise,et al.  Semantic di erential profiles for 1000 most frequent English words , 1965 .

[17]  K. Kroschel,et al.  RULE-BASED EMOTION CLASSIFICATION USING ACOUSTIC FEATURES , .

[18]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[19]  J. Mendel Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions , 2001 .

[20]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy logic and self-referential reasoning: a comparative study with some new concepts , 2014, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[21]  Cynthia Whissell,et al.  THE DICTIONARY OF AFFECT IN LANGUAGE , 1989 .

[22]  I. Turksen,et al.  Computing with descriptive and veristic words , 1999, 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397).

[23]  Panayiotis G. Georgiou,et al.  EMO20Q Questioner Agent , 2011, ACII.

[24]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Computing with words and its relationships with fuzzistics , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[25]  G. Frege Über Sinn und Bedeutung , 1892 .

[26]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments , 2010 .

[27]  Abe Kazemzadeh,et al.  EMO 20 Q Questioner Agent , 2011 .

[28]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions , 1977 .

[29]  Shrikanth Narayanan,et al.  Supervised acoustic topic model for unstructured audio information retrieval , 2010 .

[30]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic = computing with words , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  A vector similarity measure for linguistic approximation: Interval type-2 and type-1 fuzzy sets , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  From search engines to question answering systems - The problems of world knowledge, relevance, deduction and precisiation , 2006, Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web.

[33]  Panayiotis G. Georgiou,et al.  Determining what Questions to Ask, with the Help of Spectral Graph Theory , 2011, INTERSPEECH.

[34]  B. Kosko Fuzziness vs. probability , 1990 .

[35]  John Yen,et al.  FLAME—Fuzzy Logic Adaptive Model of Emotions , 2000, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[36]  Thomas E. Forster Logic, Induction and Sets , 2003, London Mathematical Society student texts.

[37]  D. Massaro,et al.  Fuzzy logical model of bimodal emotion perception: Comment on “The perception of emotions by ear and by eye” by de Gelder and Vroomen , 2000 .

[38]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Primitives-based evaluation and estimation of emotions in speech , 2007, Speech Commun..

[39]  Gilad Mishne,et al.  Applied text analytics for blogs , 2007 .

[40]  P. Ekman Facial expression and emotion. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[41]  Panayiotis G. Georgiou,et al.  Emotion Twenty Questions: Toward a Crowd-Sourced Theory of Emotions , 2011, ACII.

[42]  K. Scherer,et al.  The World of Emotions is not Two-Dimensional , 2007, Psychological science.

[43]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Challenges for Perceptual Computer Applications and How They Were Overcome , 2012, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[44]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[45]  J.M. Mendel,et al.  Computing with Words: Zadeh, Turing, Popper and Occam , 2007, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[46]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[47]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Type-2 Fuzzy Logic: Challenges and Misconceptions [Discussion Forum] , 2012, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[48]  Panayiotis G. Georgiou,et al.  A Sequential Bayesian Dialog Agent for Computational Ethnography , 2012, INTERSPEECH.

[49]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Enhanced Interval Approach for encoding words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets and convergence of the word FOUs , 2010, International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.