Short communication: previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring.

BACKGROUND The UK government has decided to introduce, from 2005, rules that will allow donor-conceived persons to have access to identifying information concerning their donor. This has led to many concerns regarding future gamete donor recruitment. METHODS Semen donors who had been recruited between 1988 and 2002 were invited to take part in a telephone interview. The interview sought these previous donors' views on issues associated with recruitment, attitudes regarding information sharing and views concerning the offspring. Responses regarding information sharing were compared with their views recorded at the time of recruitment. RESULTS All 32 donors were recruited altruistically. Eighteen (56%) held the same views concerning the provision of identifying information as they did at the time of recruitment. Of those who had changed their views, eight (25%) expressed a willingness to be more open and four (12%) now wished to be anonymous having previously been unsure. Half of the donors would still have donated if they had been required to be identified to offspring, one-quarter would not have and one-quarter were undecided, although the majority of these said they may have donated under an open system. CONCLUSION The study shows that it is possible to recruit identifiable donors at this clinic and this suggests that it may be possible for other clinics to do likewise.

[1]  E. Blyth,et al.  Policy formation in gamete donation and egg sharing in the UK--a critical appraisal. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[2]  J. Rust,et al.  Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation. , 2004, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[3]  K. Daniels.  Building a family with the assistance of donor insemination , 2004 .

[4]  O. Lalos,et al.  Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[5]  K. Daniels.  Toward a family-building approach to donor insemination. , 2002, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[6]  M. Hunter,et al.  Donor Insemination: Telling Children About Their Origins , 2000 .

[7]  S. Golombok,et al.  Oocyte and semen donation: a survey of UK licensed centres. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[8]  A. Coyle,et al.  What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[9]  E. Haimes.  Donor Insemination: The making of ‘the DI child’: changing representations of people conceived through donor insemination , 1998 .

[10]  S. B. Novaes.  Donor Insemination: The medical management of donor insemination , 1998 .

[11]  R. Blank.  Donor Insemination: Regulation of donor insemination , 1998 .

[12]  K. Daniels,et al.  Semen donor recruitment: a study of donors in two clinics. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[13]  S. Golombok,et al.  Ethics and society: A survey of semen donation: phase II — the view of the donors , 1995 .

[14]  S. Killick,et al.  A survey of semen donor attitudes. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[15]  S. Golombok,et al.  A survey of semen donation: phase I--the view of UK licensed centres. , 1994, Human reproduction.

[16]  I. Cooke,et al.  A protocol for the recruitment and screening of semen donors for an artificial insemination by donor programme. , 1988, Human reproduction.