Ambiguity and Open-Endedness in Behavioural Design

Design is increasingly concerned with changing people’s behaviours. A common characteristic to behavioural design approaches is their directionality: products provide clarity about or guidance towards the designer’s intended behavioural outcome. In this paper we propose an alternative perspective that emphasizes ambiguity (i.e. affording multiple interpretations) and open-endedness (i.e. affording multiple courses of action). We build on two design cases in pediatric healthcare in which the aim was to stimulate young children’s physical activity during hospitalization. Instead of commonly used exercise-based approaches, our focus was on physical activity in the form of spontaneous and unstructured play. We describe how interactions with ambiguous and open-ended playthings gave rise to intended behavioural outcomes. The findings are explained by drawing on Activity Theory, suggesting products can direct and leave things open on different levels of interaction. With our contribution we open up a new design space for behavioural design that reconciles designer’s intentions with end user’s appropriation.

[1]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[2]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Designing familiar open surfaces , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[3]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[4]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  “ Annoying , but in a Nice Way ” : An Inquiry into the Experience of Frictional Feedback , 2015 .

[5]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  A Research Framework for Playful Persuasion Based on Psychological Needs and Bodily Interaction , 2011, HBU.

[6]  Johan Redström,et al.  Switch! Energy Ecologies in Everyday Life , 2008 .

[7]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[8]  P. Desmet,et al.  Design for Mood: Twenty Activity-Based Opportunities to Design for Mood Regulation , 2015 .

[9]  J. Jelsma Design of behaviour steering technology , 2000 .

[10]  Johan Redström,et al.  Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[11]  R. van Ee,et al.  Gamification in Physical Therapy: More Than Using Games , 2017, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[12]  P. Verbeek What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[13]  Casper Boks,et al.  User‐centred design for sustainable behaviour , 2008 .

[14]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Level of activity in children undergoing cancer treatment , 2009, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[15]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Playscapes: a Design Perspective on Young Children's Physical Play , 2016, IDC.

[16]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Everyday adaptive design , 2002, DIS '02.

[17]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The Design with Intent Method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[19]  T. Brooks Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[20]  M. Hassenzahl,et al.  Designing Moments of Meaning and Pleasure. Experience Design and Happiness , 2013 .

[21]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[22]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Doing Design as a Part of Doing Research , 2007 .

[23]  Jinmin Seok,et al.  Non-finito products: a new design space of user creativity for personal user experience , 2014, CHI.

[24]  Philip Hingston,et al.  Considerations for the design of exergames , 2007, GRAPHITE '07.

[25]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[26]  Lenneke Kuijer,et al.  Identifying design opportunities for reduced household resource consumption: exploring practices of thermal comfort , 2012 .

[27]  J. H. Eggen,et al.  Designing for social interaction in open-ended play environments , 2015 .

[28]  Larissa Hjorth,et al.  SweatAtoms: materializing physical activity , 2013, IE.

[29]  Katinka Waelbers Doing Good with Technologies:: Taking Responsibility for the Social Role of Emerging Technologies , 2011 .