Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction.

Muscle contraction and many other cell movements are driven by cyclic interactions between actin filaments and the motor enzyme myosin. Conformational changes in the actin-myosin binding interface occur in concert with the binding of ATP, binding to actin, and loss of hydrolytic by-products, but the effects of these conformational changes on the strength of the actomyosin bond are unknown. The force-dependent kinetics of the actomyosin bond may be particularly important at high loads, where myosin may detach from actin before achieving its full power stroke. Here we show that over a physiological range of rapidly applied loads, actomyosin behaves as a "catch" bond, characterized by increasing lifetimes with increasing loads up to a maximum at approximately 6 pN. Surprisingly, we found that the myosin-ADP bond is possessed of longer lifetimes under load than rigor bonds, although the load at which bond lifetime is maximal remains unchanged. We also found that actomyosin bond lifetime is ultimately dependent not only on load, but loading history as well. These data suggest a complex relationship between the rate of actomyosin dissociation and muscle force and shortening velocity. The 6-pN load for maximum bond lifetime is near the force generated by a single myosin molecule during isometric contraction. This raises the possibility that all catch bonds between load-bearing molecules are "mechanokinetically" tuned to their physiological environment.

[1]  J. Spudich,et al.  The neck region of the myosin motor domain acts as a lever arm to generate movement. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  V Lombardi,et al.  Two independent mechanical events in the interaction cycle of skeletal muscle myosin with actin. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  W. Guilford,et al.  The tail of myosin reduces actin filament velocity in the in vitro motility assay. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[5]  Steven B Marston,et al.  The rates of formation and dissociation of actin-myosin complexes. Effects of solvent, temperature, nucleotide binding and head-head interactions. , 1982, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  E. Evans,et al.  Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[7]  C. Yengo,et al.  Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence identifies specific conformational changes at the actomyosin interface upon actin binding and ADP release. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[8]  Miriam W. Allersma,et al.  Two-dimensional tracking of ncd motility by back focal plane interferometry. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[9]  W H Guilford,et al.  Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar unitary forces and displacements in the laser trap. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[10]  P Kolb,et al.  Energy landscape of streptavidin-biotin complexes measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[11]  Rasmus R. Schröder,et al.  Electron cryo-microscopy shows how strong binding of myosin to actin releases nucleotide , 2003, Nature.

[12]  S. Ishiwata,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent single- to double-headed binding of kinesin. , 2001, Science.

[13]  D A Winkelmann,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. , 1993, Science.

[14]  V Barsegov,et al.  Dynamics of unbinding of cell adhesion molecules: transition from catch to slip bonds. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  C. Barclay.  Estimation of cross-bridge stiffness from maximum thermodynamic efficiency , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[16]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules , 2003, Nature.

[17]  J. Patlak,et al.  A mutant heterodimeric myosin with one inactive head generates maximal displacement , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Yale E Goldman,et al.  Force generation in single conventional actomyosin complexes under high dynamic load. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[19]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Biological applications of optical forces. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[20]  Oleg V Prezhdo,et al.  The two-pathway model for the catch-slip transition in biological adhesion. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Kazuhiko Kinosita,et al.  Unbinding force of a single motor molecule of muscle measured using optical tweezers , 1995, Nature.

[22]  J. Sellers,et al.  Load-dependent kinetics of myosin-V can explain its high processivity , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  M. Bartoo,et al.  The stiffness of rabbit skeletal actomyosin cross-bridges determined with an optical tweezers transducer. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[24]  A. Stewart,et al.  The myosin motor in muscle generates a smaller and slower working stroke at higher load , 2004, Nature.

[25]  Justin E. Molloy,et al.  Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Mechanochemical coupling in actomyosin energy transduction studied by in vitro movement assay. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  William H Guilford,et al.  The molecular mechanics of P- and L-selectin lectin domains binding to PSGL-1. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[28]  M. Tyska,et al.  A 7-amino-acid insert in the heavy chain nucleotide binding loop alters the kinetics of smooth muscle myosin in the laser trap , 1998, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[29]  G. I. Bell.  Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[30]  C. Yengo,et al.  Actin-induced Closure of the Actin-binding Cleft of Smooth Muscle Myosin* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  R A Milligan,et al.  Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. , 1993, Science.

[32]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Catch bonds govern adhesion through L-selectin at threshold shear , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  J. Spudich,et al.  Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps , 1994, Nature.

[34]  Jizhong Lou,et al.  Force history dependence of receptor-ligand dissociation. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[35]  J. Baker,et al.  Myosin V processivity: multiple kinetic pathways for head-to-head coordination. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  S. Ishiwata,et al.  Characterization of single actomyosin rigor bonds: load dependence of lifetime and mechanical properties. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[37]  R. Merkel,et al.  Energy landscapes of receptor–ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy , 1999, Nature.

[38]  William H. Guilford,et al.  The Light Chain Binding Domain of Expressed Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin Acts as a Mechanical Lever* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  Niels Volkmann,et al.  Myosin isoforms show unique conformations in the actin-bound state , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  R. Waugh,et al.  A microcantilever device to assess the effect of force on the lifetime of selectin-carbohydrate bonds. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[41]  T. Ando,et al.  Scanning force microscopy of the interaction events between a single molecule of heavy meromyosin and actin. , 1997, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[42]  Niels Volkmann,et al.  Evidence for cleft closure in actomyosin upon ADP release , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  A. Mehta,et al.  Detection of single-molecule interactions using correlated thermal diffusion. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  D. Warshaw,et al.  Smooth and skeletal muscle myosin both exhibit low duty cycles at zero load in vitro. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  Lina M. Nilsson,et al.  Catch-bond model derived from allostery explains force-activated bacterial adhesion. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[46]  M Anson,et al.  Myosin motors with artificial lever arms. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[47]  Miklós Nyitrai,et al.  Adenosine diphosphate and strain sensitivity in myosin motors. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[48]  Jeffrey G. Reifenberger,et al.  An actin-dependent conformational change in myosin , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[49]  H. Portzehl,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF MAGNESIUM AND CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE CHELATES, OF FREE MAGNESIUM IONS, FREE CALCIUM IONS, AND FREE PYROPHOSPHATE IONS ON THE DISSOCIATION OF ACTYMYOSIN IN SOLUTION. , 1964, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[50]  Junru Wu,et al.  Actin filament mechanics in the laser trap , 1997, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[51]  S. Lowey,et al.  [7] Preparation of myosin and its subfragments from rabbit skeletal muscle , 1982 .

[52]  William H Guilford,et al.  Creating multiple time-shared laser traps with simultaneous displacement detection using digital signal processing hardware. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[53]  W H Guilford,et al.  Two heads of myosin are better than one for generating force and motion. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  R. T. Tregear,et al.  Movement and force produced by a single myosin head , 1995, Nature.

[55]  J. Spudich,et al.  Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.