Uncertainty assessment in 3-D geological models of increasing complexity

Abstract. The quality of a 3-D geological model strongly depends on the type of integrated geological data, their interpretation and associated uncertainties. In order to improve an existing geological model and effectively plan further site investigation, it is of paramount importance to identify existing uncertainties within the model space. Information entropy, a voxel-based measure, provides a method for assessing structural uncertainties, comparing multiple model interpretations and tracking changes across consecutively built models. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of data integration (i.e., update of an existing model through successive addition of different types of geological data) on model uncertainty, model geometry and overall structural understanding. Several geological 3-D models of increasing complexity, incorporating different input data categories, were built for the study site Staufen (Germany). We applied the concept of information entropy in order to visualize and quantify changes in uncertainty between these models. Furthermore, we propose two measures, the Jaccard and the city-block distance, to directly compare dissimilarities between the models. The study shows that different types of geological data have disparate effects on model uncertainty and model geometry. The presented approach using both information entropy and distance measures can be a major help in the optimization of 3-D geological models.

[1]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Assessing quality of urban underground spaces by coupling 3D geological models: The case study of Foshan city, South China , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  G. Wirsing,et al.  Erkundung und Sanierungsstrategien im Erdwärmesonden‐Schadensfall Staufen i. Br. , 2013 .

[3]  Robert Hack,et al.  Three and more dimensional modelling in geo-engineering , 2006 .

[4]  M. Sinreich,et al.  KARSYS: a pragmatic approach to karst hydrogeological system conceptualisation. Assessment of groundwater reserves and resources in Switzerland , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[5]  A. Boucher,et al.  History matching and uncertainty quantification of facies models with multiple geological interpretations , 2013, Computational Geosciences.

[6]  Samuel T. Thiele,et al.  The topology of geology 1: Topological analysis , 2016 .

[7]  Georg Anagnostou,et al.  Swelling of sulphatic claystones – some fundamental questions and their practical relevance / , 2010 .

[8]  G. Klir Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory , 2005 .

[9]  L. Holden,et al.  Stochastic Structural Modeling , 2003 .

[10]  Alex M. Andrew,et al.  Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory , 2006 .

[11]  Junqi Liu,et al.  Glass landslide: the 3D visualization makes study of landslide transparent and virtualized , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[12]  Holger Kessler,et al.  Unlocking the potential of digital 3D geological subsurface models for geotechnical engineers , 2008 .

[13]  Settimo Termini,et al.  A Definition of a Nonprobabilistic Entropy in the Setting of Fuzzy Sets Theory , 1972, Inf. Control..

[14]  P. Blum,et al.  Schadensfallanalyse von Erdwärmesondenbohrungen in Baden-Württemberg , 2014, Grundwasser.

[15]  P. Frattini,et al.  A 3D geological model of the 1963 Vajont landslide , 2013 .

[16]  M. Jessell,et al.  Inversion and Geodiversity: Searching Model Space for the Answers , 2014, Mathematical Geosciences.

[17]  Rachida Bouhlila,et al.  3D geological modeling of the Kasserine Aquifer System, Central Tunisia: New insights into aquifer-geometry and interconnections for a better assessment of groundwater resources , 2016 .

[18]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[19]  G. Lavecchia,et al.  Defining a model of 3D seismogenic sources for Seismic Hazard Assessment applications: The case of central Apennines (Italy) , 2004 .

[20]  Crystal growth and geotechnics 1 , 2012 .

[21]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Measures of Entropy and Fuzziness Related to Aggregation Operators , 1995, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Evaluating the effect of visually represented geodata uncertainty on decision-making: systematic review, lessons learned, and recommendations , 2017 .

[23]  R. Lark,et al.  A statistical assessment of the uncertainty in a 3-D geological framework model , 2013 .

[24]  Pradipta Maji,et al.  City Block Distance for Identification of Co-expressed MicroRNAs , 2013, SEMCCO.

[25]  Herbert H. Einstein,et al.  Tunnelling in difficult ground — Swelling behaviour and identification of swelling rocks , 1996 .

[26]  Katsuaki Koike,et al.  Post-processing for uncertainty reduction in computed 3D geological models , 2014 .

[27]  Jean-Laurent Mallet,et al.  Discrete smooth interpolation in geometric modelling , 1992, Comput. Aided Des..

[28]  J. Mallet Space–Time Mathematical Framework for Sedimentary Geology , 2004 .

[29]  F. Horowitz,et al.  Towards incorporating uncertainty of structural data in 3D geological inversion , 2010 .

[30]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Uncertainties have a meaning: Information entropy as a quality measure for 3-D geological models , 2012 .

[31]  Christoph Butscher,et al.  Relation between hydrogeological setting and swelling potential of clay-sulfate rocks in tunneling , 2011 .

[32]  Guillaume Caumon,et al.  3D geomodelling combining implicit surfaces and Voronoi-based remeshing: A case study in the Lorraine Coal Basin (France) , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[33]  János Fodor,et al.  Traditional and New Ways to Handle Uncertainty in Geology , 2001 .

[34]  B. Lévy,et al.  Stochastic simulations of fault networks in 3D structural modeling. , 2010 .

[35]  Christoph Butscher,et al.  Swelling of Clay-Sulfate Rocks: A Review of Processes and Controls , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[36]  J. Caers,et al.  Dynamic data integration for structural modeling: model screening approach using a distance-based model parameterization , 2008 .

[37]  G. Caumon,et al.  Sampling the uncertainty associated with segmented normal fault interpretation using a stochastic downscaling method , 2015 .

[38]  Peter Huggenberger,et al.  Implications for karst hydrology from 3D geological modeling using the aquifer base gradient approach , 2007 .

[39]  C. Bond Uncertainty in Structural Interpretation: Lessons to be learnt , 2015 .

[40]  P. Abrahamsen,et al.  An Uncertainty Model for Fault Shape and Location , 2014, Mathematical Geosciences.

[41]  G. Caumon,et al.  Elements for Stochastic Structural Perturbation of Stratigraphic Models , 2007 .

[42]  C. Mann Uncertainty in geology , 1993 .

[43]  Aurèle Parriaux,et al.  Geological uncertainties associated with 3-D subsurface models , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[44]  J. Mallet,et al.  Editing faults within tetrahedral volume models in real time , 2007 .

[45]  Jef Caers,et al.  Representing Spatial Uncertainty Using Distances and Kernels , 2009 .

[46]  M. Jessell,et al.  Locating and quantifying geological uncertainty in three-dimensional models: Analysis of the Gippsland Basin, southeastern Australia , 2012 .

[47]  David Entwisle,et al.  3D geological models and their hydrogeological applications : supporting urban development : a case study in Glasgow-Clyde, UK , 2010 .

[48]  B. Panteleit,et al.  A regional geological and groundwater flow model of Bremen (Germany): an example management tool for resource administration , 2013 .

[49]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[50]  M. Jessell,et al.  Geodiversity: Exploration of 3D geological model space , 2013 .

[51]  J. Florian Wellmann,et al.  Information Theory for Correlation Analysis and Estimation of Uncertainty Reduction in Maps and Models , 2013, Entropy.

[52]  M. Jessell,et al.  Towards an integrated inversion of geoscientific data: What price of geology? , 2010 .

[53]  J. Behrmann,et al.  Anatomy and kinematics of oblique continental rifting revealed: A three-dimensional case study of the southeast Upper Rhine graben (Germany) , 2003 .

[54]  Martin G. Culshaw,et al.  From concept towards reality: developing the attributed 3D geological model of the shallow subsurface , 2005, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[55]  G. Caumon,et al.  Surface-Based 3D Modeling of Geological Structures , 2009 .

[56]  Samuel T. Thiele,et al.  The topology of geology 2: Topological uncertainty , 2016 .

[57]  Jef Caers,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Performance Using Distances and Kernel Methods--Application to a West Africa Deepwater Turbidite Reservoir , 2009 .

[58]  Peter Huggenberger,et al.  Risikoorientierte Bewilligung von Erdwärmesonden , 2011 .

[59]  E. Auken,et al.  Assessment of near-surface mapping capabilities by airborne transient electromagnetic data — An extensive comparison to conventional borehole data , 2014 .

[60]  Tobias Frank,et al.  3D-reconstruction of complex geological interfaces from irregularly distributed and noisy point data , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[61]  G. Caumon,et al.  Stochastic structural modelling in sparse data situations , 2015 .