Quantum gates for superconducting qubits

Quantum Gates for Superconducting Qubits Chad Tyler Rigetti 2009 Josephson junction-based devices o¤er the potential to process information with the electromagnetic modes of an engineered quantum circuit. Doing so requires the subtle application of control signals to induce arbitrary transformations of the associated Hilbert space –or quantum gates –without causing the system to decohere. But there are strict constraints on the dynamical control we can exert over the circuit Hamiltonian, and given a practical set of controls, it is in general di¢ cult to extract a particular desired transformation. Of the possible strategies to address this quantum gate problem, those requiring the fewest control parameters, the least relative control bandwidth, and the minimal number of non-linear circuit elements are particularly interesting, as they would reduce experimental complexity and minimize unwanted interactions with degrees of freedom in the environment. We show how microwave signals and …xed weak linear coupling elements can be used to e¤ectively switch on and o¤an interaction and tune its strength and direction in the on state, and we derive speci…c irradiation protocols that use these interactions to implement universal two-qubit gates. These results emerge from Fourier analysis of the circuit Hamiltonian in a particular multiply-rotating reference frame. We develop and formalize this approach, then apply it to twoand three-qubit systems. In the two-qubit case, the theory succinctly reproduces many earlier results, and reveals new methods of entangling pairs of superconducting quantum bits. For example, a static weak linear coupling reactance can give rise to an e¤ective interaction that turns on linearly with the drive amplitude when one qubit is simply irradiated at the transition frequency of the other. In the three-qubit case, it describes how a very weak o¤-diagonal three-body coupling Hamiltonian can be exploited to controllably and directly produce pure tripartite entanglement, even when the qubits are far detuned from one another. We describe e¤orts to experimentally observe some of these e¤ects in two-qubit systems. The results provide preliminary evidence for the microwave-tuned interaction of qubits with …xed linear couplings.

[1]  L Frunzio,et al.  Direct observation of dynamical bifurcation between two driven oscillation states of a Josephson junction. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[2]  Mark Dykman,et al.  Fluctuations in nonlinear systems near bifurcations corresponding to the appearance of new stable states , 1980 .

[3]  David Schuster,et al.  Circuit quantum electrodynamics , 2007 .

[4]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  Quantum computation with quantum dots , 1997, cond-mat/9701055.

[5]  J M Gambetta,et al.  Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[6]  Effects of the Bloch-Siegert Oscillation on the Precision of Qubit Rotations: Direct Two-Level vs. Off-Resonant Raman Excitation , 2004, quant-ph/0402122.

[7]  Lieven M.K. Vandersypen Experimental quantum computation with nuclear spins in liquid solution , 2001 .

[8]  Tunable coupling scheme for flux qubits at the optimal point , 2005, cond-mat/0512238.

[9]  M. Nielsen,et al.  Universal quantum computation and simulation using any entangling Hamiltonian and local unitaries , 2001, quant-ph/0106064.

[10]  P. Rebentrost,et al.  Optimal control of a leaking qubit , 2008, 0808.2680.

[11]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Analog information processing at the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator , 2008, 0805.3452.

[12]  M. Kus,et al.  Measures and dynamics of entangled states , 2005, quant-ph/0505162.

[13]  S. Girvin,et al.  Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , 2007, cond-mat/0703002.

[14]  S. Simon,et al.  Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation , 2007, 0707.1889.

[15]  Three-body interactions with cold polar molecules , 2007, cond-mat/0703688.

[16]  M. Steffen,et al.  Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography , 2006, Science.

[17]  King,et al.  Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[18]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Bang–Bang Operations from a Geometric Perspective , 2001, Quantum Inf. Process..

[19]  S. Filipp,et al.  Measurement of Autler-Townes and Mollow transitions in a strongly driven superconducting qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[20]  Mikio Nakahara,et al.  Acceleration of quantum algorithms using three-qubit gates , 2003 .

[21]  M. Metcalfe A new microwave resonator readout scheme for superconducting qubits , 2008 .

[22]  A. Cottet,et al.  Implémentation d'un bit quantique dans un circuit supraconducteur / Implementation of a quantum bit in a superconducting circuit , 2002 .

[23]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Measuring the decoherence of a quantronium qubit with the cavity bifurcation amplifier , 2007, 0706.0765.

[24]  Lorenza Viola,et al.  Advances in decoherence control , 2004, quant-ph/0404038.

[25]  A. Wallraff,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of superconducting circuit QED devices for quantum computation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[26]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , 2009, Nature.

[27]  I. Chuang,et al.  Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance , 2001, Nature.

[28]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Implementing Qubits with Superconducting Integrated Circuits , 2004, Quantum Inf. Process..

[29]  J I Cirac,et al.  Interaction cost of nonlocal gates. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[30]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Dispersive measurements of superconducting qubit coherence with a fast latching readout , 2006 .

[31]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Optimal Simulation of Two-Qubit Hamiltonians Using General Local Operations , 2001, quant-ph/0107035.

[32]  Antti O Niskanen,et al.  Optimal multiqubit operations for Josephson charge qubits. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[33]  R. Mcweeny On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2000 .

[34]  F K Wilhelm,et al.  Optimal control of a qubit coupled to a non-Markovian environment. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[35]  A. Cleland,et al.  Superconducting phase qubit coupled to a nanomechanical resonator: Beyond the rotating-wave approximation , 2004, quant-ph/0407106.

[36]  P. Zanardi,et al.  Noiseless Quantum Codes , 1997, quant-ph/9705044.

[37]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[38]  Daniel Gottesman,et al.  Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction , 1997, quant-ph/9705052.

[39]  R. Brockett,et al.  Time optimal control in spin systems , 2000, quant-ph/0006114.

[40]  Debbie W. Leung,et al.  On the capacities of bipartite Hamiltonians and unitary gates , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[41]  R. Vijayaraghavan Josephson bifurcation amplifier: Amplifying quantum signals using a dynamical bifurcation , 2008 .

[42]  Alexandre Blais,et al.  Quantum information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics , 2007 .

[43]  S. Girvin,et al.  Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics , 2004, Nature.

[44]  Lorenza Viola,et al.  Robust dynamical decoupling of quantum systems with bounded controls. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[45]  C. Monroe,et al.  Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer , 2002, Nature.

[46]  B. Josephson Weakly Coupled Superconductors , 1969 .

[47]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[48]  Lloyd,et al.  Almost any quantum logic gate is universal. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[49]  Jens Koch,et al.  Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[50]  S Lloyd,et al.  A Potentially Realizable Quantum Computer , 1993, Science.

[51]  Poul S. Jessen,et al.  Quantum Computing with Neutral Atoms in An Optical Lattice , 2000, quant-ph/0003022.

[52]  C Bruder,et al.  Variable electrostatic transformer: controllable coupling of two charge qubits. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[53]  J. E. Mooij,et al.  Demonstration of controlled-NOT quantum gates on a pair of superconducting quantum bits , 2007, Nature.

[54]  J. Love Resolved dynamics of single electron tunneling using the RF-SET , 2007 .

[55]  S. Lloyd,et al.  DYNAMICAL SUPPRESSION OF DECOHERENCE IN TWO-STATE QUANTUM SYSTEMS , 1998, quant-ph/9803057.