Indirect Decompression via Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Severe Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Study with Direct Decompression Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

[1]  K. Satake,et al.  Simultaneous single-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using O-arm-based navigation reduces the occupancy time of the operating room , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[2]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Indirect decompression with lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: minimum 1-year MRI follow-up. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  W. Hitzl,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan-based criteria compared with surgical exploration for the analysis of cervical fusion and nonunion. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  D. Chou,et al.  Predictors of the need for laminectomy after indirect decompression via initial anterior or lateral lumbar interbody fusion. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  S. Chou,et al.  Does Lumbar Interbody Cage Size Influence Subsidence? A Biomechanical Study. , 2020, Spine.

[6]  K. Satake,et al.  Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses after Immediate Post-Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results from a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up. , 2019, Spine.

[7]  Seung-Won Park,et al.  Effect of Cage in Radiological Differences between Direct and Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Techniques , 2019, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[8]  A. Goel,et al.  Lumbar canal stenosis: analyzing the role of stabilization and the futility of decompression as treatment. , 2019, Neurosurgical focus.

[9]  K. Rijkers,et al.  Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Historical Overview and a Future Perspective , 2018, Spine.

[10]  Ali H. Palejwala,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Versus Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Effect on Return to Work, Narcotic Use, and Quality of life. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[11]  K. Sairyo,et al.  Complications Associated With Lateral Interbody Fusion: Nationwide Survey of 2998 Cases During the First 2 Years of Its Use in Japan , 2017, Spine.

[12]  R. Hynes,et al.  Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  A. Korge,et al.  The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Alexander W. L. Turner,et al.  MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF , 2016, Spine.

[15]  J. O’Brien,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  J. Butler,et al.  Segmental Pelvic Correlation (SPeC): a novel approach to understanding sagittal plane spinal alignment. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[17]  Mohammed Z Allouh,et al.  Analytical comparison study of the clinical and radiological outcome of spine fixation using posterolateral, posterior lumber interbody and transforaminal lumber interbody spinal fixation techniques to treat lumber spine degenerative disc disease , 2015, Scoliosis.

[18]  Juan S. Uribe,et al.  Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Multicenter clinical outcomes , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Malham,et al.  Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[20]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Effect of Indirect Neural Decompression Through Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease , 2015, Spine.

[21]  A. Goel Only fixation for lumbar canal stenosis: Report of an experience with seven cases , 2014, Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine.

[22]  N. Abdala,et al.  Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[23]  A. Sama,et al.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 1 Year A Preliminary Report , 2011, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[24]  T. Witham,et al.  Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity , 2011, Neurological research.

[25]  S. Dement,et al.  The mini-open anterolateral approach for degenerative thoracolumbar disease , 2010, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[26]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Qualitative Grading of Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Based on the Morphology of the Dural Sac on Magnetic Resonance Images , 2010, Spine.

[27]  H. Aryan,et al.  Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[28]  K. Tamai,et al.  Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score With the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 , 2003, Spine.