Effect of adaptive learning style scenarios on learning achievements

The reported study compares three adaptive learning style scenarios, namely: matching, compensating and monitoring. The matching and compensating scenarios operate in a design-time mode, while monitoring applies in a run-time adaptation mode. In addition, the study investigates the role of pre-assessment and embedded adaptation controls. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the different adaptive scenarios, a software application serving as a test-bed was developed. An experimental study indicated that the monitoring adaptation led to higher learning achievements when compared to matching and compensating adaptation, although no significant effect was found.

[1]  J. Vermunt.  Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis , 1996 .

[2]  Øyvind Lund Martinsen,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Experience in Solving Insight Problems: Replication and Extension , 1995 .

[3]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[4]  G. Salomon.  Interaction of media, cognition and learning , 1979 .

[5]  Margaret Honey,et al.  A manual of learning styles , 1986 .

[6]  Alexandra I. Cristea,et al.  Patterns in Authoring of Adaptive Educational Hypermedia: A Taxonomy of Learning Styles , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Wendy Kicken,et al.  Scaffolding advice on task selection: a safe path toward self‐directed learning in on‐demand education , 2008 .

[8]  John M. Oughton,et al.  The Effect of Hypermedia Knowledge and Learning Style on Student-Centered Concept Maps about Hypermedia , 2000 .

[9]  Sanghee Yeo.  Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[10]  M. Portillo,et al.  The Adaptable Mind in Design: Relating Personality, Cognitive Style, and Creative Performance , 2005 .

[11]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[12]  Roni Reiter-Palmon,et al.  Encyclopedia of Creativity , 2011 .

[13]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[14]  L. Geller,et al.  Reliability of the Learning Style Inventory , 1979, Psychological reports.

[15]  Slavi Stoyanov,et al.  Effect of Problem Solving Support and Cognitive Styles on Idea Generation , 2007 .

[16]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control , 2006 .

[17]  David J. Ayersman,et al.  Individual differences, computers, and instruction , 1995 .

[18]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[19]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Adapting instruction in search of 'a significant difference' , 1999, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[20]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Personalizing the Interaction in a Web-based Educational Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE , 2003, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[21]  M. Kirton,et al.  A Psychometric Reexamination of Kolb'S Experiential Learning Cycle Construct: A Separation of Level, Style, and Process , 1996 .

[22]  Marcus Specht,et al.  Authoring of Learning Objects in Context , 2006 .

[23]  Jon C. Marshall,et al.  Reliability and Construct Validity of Alternate Forms of the Learning Style Inventory , 1985 .

[24]  Piet Kommers,et al.  The effect of adaptive performance support system on learning achievements of students. , 2008 .

[25]  Myers,et al.  Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type , 1980 .

[26]  R. Weisberg.  Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[27]  Karen Valley,et al.  Learning styles and courseware design , 1997 .

[28]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[29]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design , 2007 .

[30]  A. Furnham,et al.  Cognitive Style and Creativity , 2011 .