The ‘Value-Action Gap’ in Public Attitudes towards Sustainable Energy: The Case of Hydrogen Energy

There is now increasing evidence that the public has become much more aware of global warming, climate change and environmental risks. This has been repeatedly demonstrated in a number of official surveys and other research. However, the salience of these issues varies; for some social groups, there are other more significant problems and urgent priorities. It has also been found that while expressing strong beliefs about the negative consequences of global warming, or dependence on fossil fuels, or more positive approval of alternative and renewable energy sources, people do not seem to have translated those opinions into practical actions to limit their energy use in their domestic consumption, lifestyles, or travel patterns, for example. It is this apparent ‘discrepancy’ between stated beliefs (and values) and behaviour, which comprises the so-called ‘value-action gap’. Various writers have observed this in different contexts previously, as will be discussed below. In this chapter, we examine the importance of the value-action gap in relation to hydrogen energy and the emerging hydrogen economy. Qualitative and quantitative data are presented from a series of focus groups and a telephone questionnaire survey of selected samples in seven different areas of England and Wales. The chapter first gives a very brief outline of the nature of hydrogen energy and its potential uses as an innovative technology. Secondly, it reviews selected literature about public attitudes towards environmental and energy issues and the apparent valueaction gap. Findings from our recent research are then discussed. Finally, some general conclusions are offered to account for the ambivalence revealed in this case of hydrogen energy, and the disjunction between people’s awareness of an energy crisis and their reluctance to change behaviour.

[1]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[2]  Miriam. Ricci,et al.  Risk Perception of an Emergent Technology: The Case of Hydrogen Energy , 2006 .

[3]  James Blake Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience , 1999 .

[4]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  Stakeholders’ and Publics’ Perceptions of Hydrogen Energy Technologies , 2007 .

[5]  K. Hobson Thinking Habits into Action: The role of knowledge and process in questioning household consumption practices , 2003 .

[6]  J. Anable,et al.  AN EVIDENCE BASE REVIEW OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND TRANSPORT BEHAVIOUR , 2006 .

[7]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  The transition to hydrogen‐based energy: combining technology and risk assessments and lay perspectives , 2007 .

[8]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[9]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Public Acceptability of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Transport and Associated Refuelling Infrastructures , 2007 .

[10]  R. McKechnie,et al.  Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge , 2007 .

[11]  Miriam. Ricci,et al.  Environmental citizenship and public attitudes to hydrogen energy technologies , 2008 .

[12]  K. Hobson Sustainable lifestyles: rethinking barriers and behaviour change. , 2001 .

[13]  Miriam Ricci,et al.  What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence , 2008 .

[14]  Alison Park,et al.  British social attitudes: The 24th report , 2008 .

[15]  A. Irwin Public Dialogue and the Scientific Citizen , 2007 .

[16]  Prospects for a hydrogen economy , 1974 .

[17]  George Crabtree,et al.  The hydrogen economy , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[18]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior , 2004 .

[19]  Jillian Anable,et al.  Car Use and Climate Change: Do We Practise What We Preach? , 2008 .

[20]  S. Yearley Cultures of Environmentalism , 2004 .

[21]  A. Stirling Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .

[22]  Paul Bellaby,et al.  Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies , 2007 .

[23]  Paul Upham,et al.  Public Engagement with Hydrogen Infrastructures in Transport , 2007 .

[24]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental action in and around the home , 2006 .

[25]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Wising up : the public and new technologies , 2000 .

[26]  Alison Park,et al.  British social attitudes : the 12th report , 1995 .

[27]  Seth Pettie,et al.  Mind the gap , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[29]  Ian Christie,et al.  How Green Are Our Values , 2001 .

[30]  Guy Robinson,et al.  On misunderstanding science , 1996 .

[31]  Alison Mohr Against the Stream: Moving Public Engagement on Nanotechnologies Upstream , 2007 .

[32]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[33]  Kate Burningham,et al.  Global Environmental Values and Local Contexts of Action , 1994 .

[34]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Stern Review : The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[35]  Peter Dickens Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory , 1992 .

[36]  P. Macnaghten Embodying the Environment in Everyday Life Practices , 2003 .

[37]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Risk As Globalising "Democratic" Discourse? Framing Subjects And Citizens , 2006 .

[38]  J. Urry Climate change, travel and complex futures. , 2008, The British journal of sociology.

[39]  W. McDowall,et al.  Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature , 2006 .

[40]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[41]  James Wilsdon,et al.  See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .