Adaptive limited-supply online auctions

We study a limited-supply online auction problem, in which an auctioneer has k goods to sell and bidders arrive and depart dynamically. We suppose that agent valuations are drawn independently from some unknown distribution and construct an adaptive auction that is nevertheless value- andtime-strategy proof. For the k=1 problem we have a strategyproof variant on the classic secretary problem. We present a 4-competitive (e-competitive) strategyproof online algorithm with respect to offline Vickrey for revenue (efficiency). We also show (in a model that slightly generalizes the assumption of independent valuations) that no mechanism can be better than 3/2-competitive (2-competitive) for revenue (efficiency). Our general approach considers a learning phase followed by an accepting phase, and is careful to handle incentive issues for agents that span the two phases. We extend to the k›1 case, by deriving strategyproof mechanisms which are constant-competitive for revenue and efficiency. Finally, we present some strategyproof competitive algorithms for the case in which adversary uses a distribution known to the mechanism.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[3]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence , 1966 .

[4]  Robert J. Vanderbei The Optimal Choice of a Subset of a Population , 1980, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Kenneth S. Glasser,et al.  The d-Choice Secretary Problem. , 1983 .

[6]  John G. Wilson Optimal choice and assignment of the best m of n randomly arriving items , 1991 .

[7]  Nimrod Megiddo,et al.  Improved algorithms and analysis for secretary problems and generalizations , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE 36th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[8]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Competitive analysis of incentive compatible on-line auctions , 2000, EC '00.

[9]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Competitive auctions and digital goods , 2001, SODA '01.

[10]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Online learning in online auctions , 2003, SODA '03.

[11]  Eric J. Friedman,et al.  Pricing WiFi at Starbucks: issues in online mechanism design , 2003, EC '03.

[12]  Frank Thomson Leighton,et al.  The value of knowing a demand curve: bounds on regret for online posted-price auctions , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  David C. Parkes,et al.  An MDP-Based Approach to Online Mechanism Design , 2003, NIPS.

[14]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Reducing truth-telling online mechanisms to online optimization , 2003, STOC '03.

[15]  Jérémie Gallien,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4268-02 December 2002 Dynamic Mechanism Design for Online Commerce , 2002 .