Salience maps in parietal cortex: Imaging and computational modeling

Models of spatial attention are often based on the concept of a salience map. In computational cognitive neuroscience, such maps are implemented as a collection of nodes with self-excitation and lateral inhibition between all nodes (competitive interaction map). Here, we test some critical predictions of this idea. We argued that task demands, more precisely the level of attention required, can top-down modulate the level of lateral inhibition in a salience map, and thus induce different activation functions. We first show that a model with a high lateral inhibition parameter generates a monotonous activation curve as a function of set size similar to that typically observed in the literature (e.g. Todd and Marois, 2004). Next, we show that a competitive interaction map with medium lateral inhibition leads to a Lambda-shaped activation curve when set sizes increase. This prediction is confirmed in an fMRI experiment with medium attention demands where a similar Lambda-shaped activation curve is found in a posterior superior parietal area that was proposed to house a salience map (Todd and Marois, 2004). Finally, we show that a qualitatively different V-shaped activation curve is predicted with a very low inhibition parameter. An fMRI experiment with low attentional demands revealed this V-shaped activation curve in the same region. These findings provide critical support for the existence of a salience map based on competitive interactions in posterior superior parietal cortex, and suggest that its parameters (in particular, lateral inhibition) can be modulated in a top down manner dependent on task demands.

[1]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Jerry M Crutchfield,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Stronger Synaptic Connectivity as a Mechanism behind Development of Working Memory-related Brain Activity during Childhood , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[8]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Macaque Monkeys Performing Visually Guided Saccade Tasks Comparison of Cortical Eye Fields with Humans , 2004, Neuron.

[9]  S. Grossberg How does a brain build a cognitive code , 1980 .

[10]  Vikrant Kapoor,et al.  Activity-dependent gating of lateral inhibition in the mouse olfactory bulb , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  R. Marois,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Attention in natural scenes: Neurophysiological and computational bases , 2006, Neural Networks.

[16]  Wim Fias,et al.  Number Processing Pathways in Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Distribution of activity across the monkey cerebral cortical surface, thalamus and midbrain during rapid, visually guided saccades. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  A. Treisman How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[20]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Marius Usher,et al.  Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Connectionist Models in Cognitive Neuroscience , 1999, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[23]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey during an antisaccade task , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Jacqueline Gottlieb,et al.  LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention , 2003, Science.

[26]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Persistent neural activity during the maintenance of spatial position in working memory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 2004, Nature.

[28]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex , 2004 .

[29]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[30]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[31]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[32]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Rolls,et al.  Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: A unifying theory , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[34]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Event-Related Potential Measures of Visual Working Memory , 2006, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[35]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[36]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Object Priming in Humans Revealed by Rapid Presentation Event-Related fMRI , 1998, Neuron.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Human posterior parietal cortex maintains color, shape and motion in visual short-term memory , 2008, Brain Research.

[39]  James W Bisley,et al.  Neural correlates of attention and distractibility in the lateral intraparietal area. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Boris S. Gutkin,et al.  Conditions for noise reduction and stable encoding of spatial structure by cortical neural networks , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[42]  A M Dale,et al.  Randomized event‐related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[43]  M. Sereno,et al.  Mapping of Contralateral Space in Retinotopic Coordinates by a Parietal Cortical Area in Humans , 2001, Science.

[44]  Marius Usher,et al.  Short Term Memory and Selection Processes in a Frontal-Lobe Model , 1999 .

[45]  David W. Shucard,et al.  Stage and load effects on ERP topography during verbal and spatial working memory , 2009, Brain Research.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network , 2003, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  Hubert D. Zimmer,et al.  Common coding of auditory and visual spatial information in working memory , 2008, Brain Research.

[50]  M. Brass,et al.  Decomposing Components of Task Preparation with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[52]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Distinctive Neural Mechanisms Supporting Visual Object Individuation and Identification , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attentional demands predict short-term memory load response in posterior parietal cortex , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[56]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.