Performance Improvement Methods for Burst-Switched Networks

In this paper, we present a performance model of optical burst switching (OBS) that can explain the degradation of OBS throughput performance when the control packet processing time increases. We then use the proposed performance model to investigate three feasible methods to improve OBS performance without significantly increasing the implementation complexity: addition of simple fiber delay lines (FDLs), random extra offset time, and window-based channel scheduling (WBS). Additional FDLs can eliminate the negative impact caused by the variation of the offset time between control packets and data bursts. The random extra offset time approach does not require any additional hardware and computational capability in the nodes. If higher computational capability is available, WBS in general can provide better throughput improvement than that of random extra offset time when FDLs are used in the nodes to compensate the processing time. Simulation results show that a combination of the proposed methods can significantly improve OBS performance.

[1]  Chun-Yin Li,et al.  Optical burst switching with large switching overhead , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[2]  You-Ze Cho,et al.  An Efficient Optical Burst Switching Technique for Multi-Hop Networks , 2004 .

[3]  J. Pedro,et al.  Traffic Engineering in the Wavelength Domain for Optical Burst-Switched Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Hailong Li,et al.  Performance of the implementation of a pipeline buffering system in optical burst switching networks , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[5]  Vinod Vokkarane,et al.  Prioritized burst segmentation and composite burst-assembly techniques for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[6]  QiaoChunming,et al.  Optical burst switching (OBS) - a new paradigm for an optical Internet , 1999 .

[7]  Chun-Yin Li,et al.  Novel resource reservation schemes for optical burst switching , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[8]  Nicholas F. Maxemchuk,et al.  Routing in the Manhattan Street Network , 1987, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  Brian L. Mark,et al.  Performance modeling of optical-burst switching with fiber delay lines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  H.M.H. Shalaby,et al.  A Simplified Performance Analysis of Optical Burst-Switched Networks , 2007, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[11]  J.Y. Wei,et al.  Just-in-time signaling for WDM optical burst switching networks , 2000, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[12]  M. Duser,et al.  Analysis of a dynamically wavelength-routed optical burst switched network architecture , 2002 .

[13]  R. Ravikanth,et al.  Optical burst switching: a viable solution for terabit IP backbone , 2000 .

[14]  Yijun Xiong,et al.  Control architecture in optical burst-switched WDM networks , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  J. Aracil,et al.  Analysis of Blocking Probability of Data Bursts With Continuous-Time Variable Offsets in Single-Wavelength OBS Switches , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  Lachlan L. H. Andrew,et al.  Does header length affect performance in optical burst switched networks , 2004 .

[17]  Jonathan S. Turner,et al.  Terabit burst switching , 1999, J. High Speed Networks.

[18]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Maximizing Throughput for Optical Burst Switching Networks , 2004, INFOCOM.

[19]  Neil Barakat,et al.  Analytical modeling of offset-induced priority in multiclass OBS networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[20]  Indra Widjaja Performance analysis of burst admission-control protocols , 1995 .