Large-scale focusing joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data with Gramian constraint

A fast algorithm for the large-scale joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data is developed. The algorithm uses a nonlinear Gramian constraint to impose correlation between the density and susceptibility of the reconstructed models. The global objective function is formulated in the space of the weighted parameters, but the Gramian constraint is implemented in the original space, and the nonlinear constraint is imposed using two separate Lagrange parameters, one for each model domain. It is significant that this combined approach, using the two spaces provides more similarity between the reconstructed models. Moreover, it is shown theoretically that the gradient for the use of the unweighted space is not a scalar multiple of that used for the weighted space, and hence cannot be accounted for by adjusting the Lagrange parameters. It is assumed that the measured data are obtained on a uniform grid and that a consistent regular discretization of the volume domain is imposed. Then, the sensitivity matrices exhibit a block Toeplitz Toeplitz block structure for each depth layer of the model domain, and both forward and transpose operations with the matrices can be implemented efficiently using two dimensional fast Fourier transforms. This makes it feasible to solve for large scale problems with respect to both computational costs and memory demands, and to to solve the nonlinear problem by applying iterative methods that rely only on matrix vector multiplications. As such, the use of the regularized reweighted conjugate gradient algorithm, in conjunction with the structure of the sensitivity matrices, leads to a fast methodology for large-scale joint inversion of geophysical data sets. Numerical simulations demonstrate that it is possible to apply a nonlinear joint inversion algorithm, with Lp-norm stabilisers, for the reconstruction of large model domains on a standard laptop computer. It is demonstrated, that while the p = 1 choice provides sparse reconstructed solutions with sharp boundaries, it is also possible to use p = 2 in order to provide smooth and blurred models. The methodology is used for inverting gravity and magnetic data obtained over an area in northwest of Mesoproterozoic St. Francois Terrane, southeast of Missouri, USA.

[1]  Jarom D. Hogue,et al.  A fast methodology for large-scale focusing inversion of gravity and magnetic data using the structured model matrix and the $2D$ fast Fourier transform , 2020, Geophysical Journal International.

[2]  Rosemary A. Renaut,et al.  Research Note: A unifying framework for the widely used stabilization of potential field inverse problems , 2020, Geophysical Prospecting.

[3]  Jarom D. Hogue,et al.  A Tutorial and Open Source Software for the Efficient Evaluation of Gravity and Magnetic Kernels , 2019, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  Douglas W Oldenburg,et al.  Inversion using spatially variable mixed ℓp norms , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[5]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Imaging Yellowstone magmatic system by the joint Gramian inversion of gravity and magnetotelluric data , 2019, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors.

[6]  Rosemary A. Renaut,et al.  Improving the use of the randomized singular value decomposition for the inversion of gravity and magnetic data , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[7]  L. Gross,et al.  Weighted cross-gradient function for joint inversion with the application to regional 3-D gravity and magnetic anomalies , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[8]  Lanbo Liu,et al.  Fast and accurate forward modelling of gravity field using prismatic grids , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[9]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Joint multinary inversion of gravity and magnetic data using Gramian constraints , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[10]  B. T. Ives,et al.  Using Gravity and Magnetic Data for Insights into the Mesoproterozoic St. Francois Terrane, Southeast Missouri: Implications for Iron Oxide Deposits , 2018, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[11]  Rosemary A. Renaut,et al.  3-D Projected L1 inversion of gravity data using truncated unbiased predictive risk estimator for regularization parameter estimation , 2017 .

[12]  S. Vatankhah,et al.  A fast algorithm for regularized focused 3D inversion of gravity data using randomized singular-value decomposition , 2017, GEOPHYSICS.

[13]  Jiajia Sun,et al.  Joint inversion of multiple geophysical and petrophysical data using generalized fuzzy clustering algorithms , 2017 .

[14]  J. Slack,et al.  Regional Geologic and Petrologic Framework for Iron Oxide ± Apatite ± Rare Earth Element and Iron Oxide Copper-Gold Deposits of the Mesoproterozoic St. Francois Mountains Terrane, Southeast Missouri, USA , 2016 .

[15]  Yau Shu Wong,et al.  BTTB-based numerical schemes for three-dimensional gravity field inversion , 2015 .

[16]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Inverse Theory and Applications in Geophysics , 2015 .

[17]  Jiajia Sun,et al.  Adaptive Lp inversion for simultaneous recovery of both blocky and smooth features in a geophysical model , 2014 .

[18]  Sergey Voronin,et al.  Compression approaches for the regularized solutions of linear systems from large-scale inverse problems , 2014, 1404.5684.

[19]  R. Renaut,et al.  Regularization parameter estimation for underdetermined problems by the χ 2 principle with application to 2D focusing gravity inversion , 2014, 1402.3365.

[20]  Eldad Haber,et al.  Model Fusion and Joint Inversion , 2013, Surveys in Geophysics.

[21]  R. E. Denison,et al.  Ages of pre-rift basement and synrift rocks along the conjugate rift and transform margins of the Argentine Precordillera and Laurentia , 2012 .

[22]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Generalized joint inversion of multimodal geophysical data using Gramian constraints , 2012 .

[23]  C. Farquharson,et al.  Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration , 2010 .

[24]  Luis A. Gallardo,et al.  Cross-gradients joint 3D inversion with applications to gravity and magnetic data , 2009 .

[25]  Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin,et al.  Applying Compactness Constraints to Differential Traveltime Tomography , 2007 .

[26]  N. Linde,et al.  Local earthquake (LE) tomography with joint inversion for P‐ and S‐wave velocities using structural constraints , 2006 .

[27]  M. Meju,et al.  Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints , 2004 .

[28]  M. Meju,et al.  Characterization of heterogeneous near‐surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data , 2003 .

[29]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Fast inversion of large-scale magnetic data using wavelet transforms and a logarithmic barrier method , 2003 .

[30]  Afnimar,et al.  Joint inversion of refraction and gravity data for the three-dimensional topography of a sediment–basement interface , 2002 .

[31]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  3‐D magnetic inversion with data compression and image focusing , 2002 .

[32]  M. Chouteau,et al.  Constraints in 3D gravity inversion , 2001 .

[33]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Focusing geophysical inversion images , 1999 .

[34]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  NON-LINEAR INVERSION USING GENERAL MEASURES OF DATA MISFIT AND MODEL STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[35]  Mark Pilkington,et al.  3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients , 1997 .

[36]  E. Haber,et al.  Joint inversion: a structural approach , 1997 .

[37]  R. Blakely Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications , 1996 .

[38]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  3-D inversion of magnetic data , 1996 .

[39]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Subspace linear inverse method , 1994 .

[40]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Generalized subspace methods for large-scale inverse problems , 1993 .

[41]  D. Rao,et al.  A rapid method for three‐dimensional modeling of magnetic anomalies , 1991 .

[42]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[43]  K. Kubik,et al.  Compact gravity inversion , 1983 .

[44]  Jarom D. Hogue,et al.  An Efficient Alternating Algorithm for the Lₚ-Norm Cross-Gradient Joint Inversion of Gravity and Magnetic Data Using the 2-D Fast Fourier Transform , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[45]  M. Zhdanov,et al.  Advanced Methods of Joint Inversion of Multiphysics Data for Mineral Exploration , 2021 .

[46]  A. Roberts,et al.  A framework for 3-D joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic refraction data , 2011 .

[47]  Colin Farquharson,et al.  Constructing piecewise-constant models in multidimensional minimum-structure inversions , 2008 .

[48]  Afnimar,et al.  Joint inversion of refraction and gravity data for the 3-D basement structure beneath Osaka Basin , 2000 .

[49]  Lars Relund Nielsen,et al.  Integrated gravity and wide‐angle seismic inversion fortwo‐dimensional crustal modelling , 2000 .

[50]  Valéria C. F. Barbosa,et al.  Generalized compact gravity inversion , 1994 .

[51]  C. Vogel Computational Methods for Inverse Problems , 1987 .