Monitoring breeding herd production data to detect PRRSV outbreaks.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) causes substantial economic impact due to significant losses in productivity. Thus, measuring changes in farm productivity before and after PRRS infection enables quantifying the production and economic impact of outbreaks. This study assessed the application of exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA), a statistical process control method, on selected production data (number of abortions, pre-weaning mortality rate and prenatal losses) to supplement PRRS surveillance programs by detecting significant deviations on productivity in a production system with 55,000 sows in 14 breed-to-wean herds in Minnesota, U.S.A. Weekly data from diagnostic monitoring program (available through the Morrison's Swine Health Monitoring Project) implemented on the same herds was used as reference for PRRS status. The time-to-detect, percentage of early detection of PRRSv-associated productivity deviations, and relative sensitivity and specificity of the production data monitoring system were determined relative to the MSHMP. The time-to-detect deviations on productivity associated with PRRS outbreaks using the EWMA method was -4 to -1 weeks (interquartile range) for the number of abortions, 0-0 for preweaning mortality and -1 to 3 weeks for prenatal losses compared to the date it was reported in the MSHMP database. Overall, the models had high relative sensitivity (range 85.7-100%) and specificity (range 98.5%-99.6%) when comparing to the changes in PRRS status reported in the MSHMP database. In summary, the use of systematic data monitoring showed a high concordance compared to the MSHMP-reported outbreaks indicating that on-farm staff and veterinary oversight were efficient to detect PRRSv, but can be more efficient if they were monitoring closely the frequency of abortions. The systematic monitoring of production indicators using EWMA offers opportunity to standardize and semi-automate the detection of deviations on productivity associated with PRRS infection, offering opportunity to early detect outbreaks and/or to quantify the production losses attributed to PRRS infection.

[1]  Dale Polson,et al.  Terminology for classifying swine herds by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus status , 2011, Journal of Swine Health and Production.

[2]  William H. Woodall,et al.  The Use of Control Charts in Health-Care and Public-Health Surveillance , 2006 .

[3]  Mo D Salman Surveillance tools and strategies for animal diseases in a shifting climate context , 2013, Animal Health Research Reviews.

[4]  R. Morrison,et al.  Temporal and spatial dynamics of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in the United States. , 2015, American journal of veterinary research.

[5]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[6]  Anders Ringgaard Kristensen,et al.  A model for monitoring the condition of young pigs by their drinking behaviour , 2005 .

[7]  A de Vries,et al.  Design and performance of statistical process control charts applied to estrous detection efficiency. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  J K Reneau,et al.  Bulk tank somatic cell counts analyzed by statistical process control tools to identify and monitor subclinical mastitis incidence. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  R. Morrison,et al.  Comparison of time to PRRSv-stability and production losses between two exposure programs to control PRRSv in sow herds. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Optimisation of the decision tree technique applied to simulated sow herd datasets , 2006 .

[11]  Kristof Mertens,et al.  Statistical control charts as a support tool for the management of livestock production , 2011 .

[12]  R. Morrison,et al.  Production impact & time to stability in sow herds infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). , 2016, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  D M Weary,et al.  Board-invited review: Using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[14]  I. Dohoo,et al.  Using and interpreting diagnostic tests. , 2006, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[15]  A De Vries,et al.  Application of statistical process control charts to monitor changes in animal production systems. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[16]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Journal of Swine Health and Production Blockin— Oral-fluid Blockinsamples Blockinfor Blockinsurveillance Blockinof Blockincommercial Blockingrowing Pigs Blockinfor Blockinporcine Blockinreproductive Blockinand Blockinrespiratory Blockinsyndrome Blockinvirus and Blockinporcine Blockincircovirus Block , 2022 .

[17]  R. Morrison,et al.  Previous infection of sows with a "mild" strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus confers protection against infection with a "severe" strain. , 2015, Veterinary microbiology.

[18]  James Kliebenstein,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers , 2013, Journal of Swine Health and Production.

[19]  K. Keffaber Reproductive failure of unknown etiol-ogy. , 1989 .

[20]  W. Quimby,et al.  Application of feeding behaviour to predict morbidity of newly received calves in a commercial feedlot , 2001 .

[21]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Control charts applied to simulated sow herd datasets. , 2009 .

[22]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Control charts applied to pig farming data. , 2009 .

[23]  P. Pozzi,et al.  Reproductive diseases in sows (Sus scrofa domestica): A Review , 2012 .

[24]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Automatic detection of oestrus and health disorders using data from electronic sow feeders , 2008 .

[25]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Terminologie zur Klassifizierung des PRRSV-Status von Schweineherden* , 2011, Tierärztliche Praxis G: Großtiere/Nutztiere.