THE EVOLUTION OF BODY ARMOR IN MAMMALS: PLANTIGRADE CONSTRAINTS OF LARGE BODY SIZE

Abstract.— Predictions associated with opposing selection generating minimum variance in basal metabolic rate (BMR) in mammals at a constrained body mass (CBM; 358 g) were tested. The CBM is presumed to be associated with energetic constraints linked to predation and variable resources at intermediate sizes on a logarithmic mass scale. Opposing selection is thought to occur in response to energetic constraints associated with predation and unpredictable resources. As body size approaches and exceeds the CBM, mammals face increasing risks of predation and daily energy requirements. Fast running speeds may require high BMRs, but unpredictable and low resources may select for low BMRs, which also reduce foraging time and distances and thus predation risks. If these two selection forces oppose each other persistently, minimum BMR variance may result. However, extreme BMR outliers at and close to the CBM should be indicative of unbalanced selection and predator avoidance alternatives (escapers vs. defenders), and may therefore provide indirect support for opposing selection. It was confirmed that body armor in defenders evolves at and above the CBM, and armored mammals had significantly lower BMRs than their nonarmored counterparts. However, analyses comparing the BMR of escapers–the fastest nonarmored runners (Lagomorpha)—with similar‐sized counterparts were inconclusive and were confounded by limb morphology associated with speed optimization. These analyses suggest that the risks and costs of predation and the speed limitations of the plantigrade foot may constrain the evolution of large body sizes in plantigrade mammals.

[1]  F. Lapointe,et al.  DNA-hybridisation Studies of Marsupials and their Implications for Metatherian Classification , 1997 .

[2]  H. Levenson,et al.  System Atics of the Holarctic Chipmunks (Tamias) , 1985 .

[3]  R. Smithers,et al.  The mammals of the southern African subregion , 1983 .

[4]  E. Douzery,et al.  Molecular evolution of the nuclear von Willebrand factor gene in mammals and the phylogeny of rodents. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  R. Lacy,et al.  Basal metabolic rates in mammals: taxonomic differences in the allometry of BMR and body mass. , 1985, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[6]  T. Garland,et al.  Polytomies in Comparative Analyses of Continuous Characters , 1993 .

[7]  S. Yahav,et al.  Can desert rodents better utilize low quality roughage than their non-desert kindred? , 1987 .

[8]  K. Gaston,et al.  The species–body size distribution: energy, fitness and optimality , 1997 .

[9]  C. Pond,et al.  Walker's Mammals of the World, 4th Edition, Ronald M. Nowak, John L. Paradiso. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1983), 1xi, +1-568 (Vol. I), xxv+569-1362 (Vol. II). Price $65.00 , 1984 .

[10]  C. Groves,et al.  Toward a phylogenetic classification of Primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. , 1998, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[11]  B. McNab,et al.  The Influence of Food Habits on the Energetics of Eutherian Mammals , 1986 .

[12]  S. Stanley,et al.  AN EXPLANATION FOR COPE'S RULE , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[14]  M. Taper,et al.  Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of Fitness , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[15]  M. Hildebrand.  Analysis of Vertebrate Structure , 1974 .

[16]  N. Garbutt.  Mammals of Madagascar , 1999 .

[17]  N. L. McKenzie,et al.  Patterns in the modern decline of western Australia's vertebrate fauna: Causes and conservation implications , 1989 .

[18]  J. Damuth.  Cope's rule, the island rule and the scaling of mammalian population density , 1993, Nature.

[19]  M. Kleiber.  Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[20]  J. Kozłowski.  Energetic Definition of Fitness? Yes, But Not That One , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[21]  J. Kozłowski.  Optimal Initial Size and Adult Size of Animals: Consequences for Macroevolution and Community Structure , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Don E. Wilson,et al.  The Mammal Species of the World , 2009 .

[23]  D. Mouchiroud,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of rodents, with special emphasis on murids: evidence from nuclear gene LCAT. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[24]  J. Castilla,et al.  Body size, population density, and the energetic equivalence rule , 1995 .

[25]  P. Baverstock,et al.  Evolution in the Murinae (Rodentia) Assessed by Microcomplement Fixation of Albumin , 1995 .

[26]  E. Charnov,et al.  A trade-off-invariant life-history rule for optimal offspring size , 1995, Nature.

[27]  M. Mares.  Mammal Faunas of Xeric Habitats and the Great American Interchange , 1985 .

[28]  R. Nowak.  Walker's bats of the world , 1994 .

[29]  J. Weiner.  Metabolic constraints to mammalian energy budgets , 1989 .

[30]  C. Janson,et al.  Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks , 1995 .

[31]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[32]  M. Symonds.  Life histories of the Insectivora : the role of phylogeny, metabolism and sex differences , 1999 .

[33]  L. Walford,et al.  Bioenergetics and Growth , 1947 .

[34]  K. Halanych,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships of cottontails (Sylvilagus, Lagomorpha): congruence of 12S rDNA and cytogenetic data. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[35]  K. Gaston,et al.  On being the right size: Different definitions of 'right' , 1996 .

[36]  T. Garland.  Scaling the Ecological Cost of Transport to Body Mass in Terrestrial Mammals , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[37]  James H. Brown,et al.  Darwinian Fitness and Reproductive Power: Reply to Kozlowski , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[38]  P. Waddell,et al.  Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[39]  James H. Brown,et al.  THE MICRO AND MACRO IN BODY SIZE EVOLUTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  C. F. Nadler,et al.  Chromosomal evolution in holarctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus). II: Giemsa-band homologies of chromosomes and the tempo of evolution , 1984 .

[41]  A. Purvis.  A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  W. Burt,et al.  A field guide to the mammals : North America, north of Mexico , 1980 .

[43]  M. Pagel,et al.  Mammalian Metabolism and Life Histories , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[44]  A. Heusner.  Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? , 1982, Respiration physiology.

[45]  J. Weiner,et al.  Interspecific Allometries Are by-Products of Body Size Optimization , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Ronald Strahan,et al.  Complete book of Australian mammals , 1984 .

[47]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[48]  D. Klein,et al.  Cytochrome b phylogeny of North American hares and jackrabbits (Lepus, lagomorpha) and the effects of saturation in outgroup taxa. , 1999, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[49]  J. Alroy.  Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals. , 1998, Science.

[50]  M. Mckenna.  Edentates: the evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas. , 1986, Science.

[51]  M. Pagel.  A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[52]  C. F. Nadler,et al.  Chromosomal evolution in Holarctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus) , 1983 .

[53]  F. Bozinovic,et al.  Dietary and Digestive Constraints on Basal Energy Metabolism in a Small Herbivorous Rodent , 1993 .

[54]  J. Downing,et al.  CRC Handbook of Mammalian Body Masses , 1995 .

[55]  T. Flannery.  The Future Eaters , 1994 .

[56]  Barry G Lovegrove,et al.  The Zoogeography of Mammalian Basal Metabolic Rate , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[57]  T. Garland,et al.  Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach. , 1999, Systematic biology.