Combining accelerometer data and contextual variables to evaluate the risk of driver behaviour

Telemetry devices are generating and transferring increasingly more data, with notable potential for decision makers. In this paper we consider the accelerometer and speed data produced by in-vehicle data recorders as a proxy for driver behaviour. Instead of extracting harsh events to cope with the large volumes of data, we discretise the data into a tractable and finite risk space. This novel methodology allows us to track both acceptable and non-acceptable driving behaviour, and calculate a more comprehensive risk model using the envelope of the data, and nota priorithresholds. We show how thresholds suggested in literature can characterise some driving behaviour as good, even though our empirical evidence has not even registered such extreme driving behaviour. We demonstrate the model using accelerometer data from 124 vehicles over a one month period. Three rules, each a combination of accelerometer and/or speed data, are applied to the risk space to derive person-specific scores that are comparable among the individuals. The results show that the scoring is useful to identify specific risk groups. The proposed model is also dynamic in that it dynamically adjusts to the observed records, instead of data having to abide by a limited model specification.

[1]  Hillel Bar-Gera,et al.  Temporal perspective on individual driver behavior using electronic records of undesirable events. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Carmen Sánchez Ávila,et al.  Modeling and Detecting Aggressiveness From Driving Signals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Dot Hs,et al.  The 100 Car Naturalistic Driving Study , 2002 .

[4]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  Can providing feedback on driving behavior and training on parental vigilant care affect male teen drivers and their parents? , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M. Sako,et al.  Profiting from business model innovation: Evidence from Pay-As-You-Drive auto insurance , 2013 .

[6]  Donald D. Duncan,et al.  The driver monitor system : A means of assessing driver performance , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[8]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  In-vehicle data recorders for monitoring and feedback on drivers' behavior , 2008 .

[9]  Luis Miguel Bergasa,et al.  DriveSafe: An app for alerting inattentive drivers and scoring driving behaviors , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[10]  Kate Smith-Miles,et al.  Clustering technique for risk classification and prediction of claim costs in the automobile insurance industry , 2001, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[11]  Bing-Fei Wu,et al.  Driving behaviour-based event data recorder , 2014 .

[12]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Driving style recognition using a smartphone as a sensor platform , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[13]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  In-Vehicle Data Recorder for Evaluation of Driving Behavior and Safety , 2006 .

[14]  Hillel Bar-Gera,et al.  Electronic Records of Undesirable Driving Events , 2010 .

[15]  G McGwin,et al.  Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  José Eugenio Naranjo,et al.  Modeling the Driving Behavior of Electric Vehicles Using Smartphones and Neural Networks , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[17]  Thorsten Staake,et al.  Multivariate exposure modeling of accident risk: Insights from Pay-as-you-drive insurance data , 2014 .

[18]  Carlo Giacomo Prato,et al.  Modeling the behavior of novice young drivers during the first year after licensure. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  Driving behavior analysis with smartphones: insights from a controlled field study , 2012, MUM.