A Probabilistic Approach to the Coupled Reconstruction and Restoration of Underwater Acoustic Images

Describes a probabilistic technique for the coupled reconstruction and restoration of underwater acoustic images. The technique is founded on the physics of the image-formation process. Beamforming, a method widely applied in acoustic imaging, is used to build a range image from backscattered echoes, associated point by point with another type of information representing the reliability (or confidence) of such an image. Unfortunately, this kind of images is plagued by problems due to the nature of the signal and to the related sensing system. In the proposed algorithm, the range and confidence images are modeled as Markov random fields whose associated probability distributions are specified by a single energy function. This function has been designed to fully embed the physics of the acoustic image-formation process by modeling a priori knowledge of the acoustic system, the considered scene, and the noise-affecting measures and also by integrating reliability information to allow the coupled and simultaneous reconstruction and restoration of both images. Optimal (in the maximum a posteriori probability sense) estimates of the reconstructed range image map and the restored confidence image are obtained by minimizing the energy function using simulated annealing. Experimental results show the improvement of the processed images over those obtained by other methods performing separate reconstruction and restoration processes that disregard reliability information.

[1]  S. Shaw,et al.  Automated error detection in multibeam bathymetry data , 1993, Proceedings of OCEANS '93.

[2]  J. Sutton.  Underwater acoustic imaging , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Adam Krzyzak,et al.  Robust Estimation for Range Image Segmentation and Reconstruction , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Andrea Trucco,et al.  Acoustic image improvement by confidence levels , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[5]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  Surfaces in Range Image Understanding , 1988, Springer Series in Perception Engineering.

[6]  R. K. Hansen.  An acoustic camera for 3D underwater imaging , 1993 .

[7]  Toshimitsu Asakura,et al.  Effect of surface roughness on the statistical distribution of image speckle intensity , 1974 .

[8]  H. V. Gelder.  The Netherlands , 2004, Constitutions of Europe (2 vols.).

[9]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  The Computation of Visible-Surface Representations , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Vittorio Murino,et al.  Underwater 3D imaging by FFT dynamic focusing beamforming , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Roman Kuc,et al.  A Physical Model-Based Analysis of Heterogeneous Environments Using Sonar-ENDURA Method , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  José L. Marroquín,et al.  Probabilistic solution of inverse problems , 1985 .

[14]  Daniel Sauter,et al.  Spatial filtering for speckle reduction, contrast enhancement, and texture analysis of GLORIA images , 1994 .

[15]  T. L. Henderson,et al.  Seafloor profiling by a wideband sonar: simulation, frequency-response optimization, and results of a brief sea test , 1989 .

[16]  E. Jakeman,et al.  Generalized K distribution: a statistical model for weak scattering , 1987 .

[17]  Richard O. Nielsen,et al.  Sonar Signal Processing , 1991 .

[18]  R. Bahl,et al.  Simulation of backscattering of high frequency sound from complex objects and sand sea-bottom , 1995 .

[19]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Segmentation through Variable-Order Surface Fitting , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Vittorio Murino,et al.  Distributed propagation of a-priori constraints in a Bayesian network of Markov random fields , 1993 .

[21]  Vittorio Murino,et al.  Dynamic focusing by FFT beamforming for underwater 3D imaging , 1994 .

[22]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Reconstruction and Boundary Detection of Range and Intensity Images Using Multiscale MRF Representations , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[23]  Y. Higashi,et al.  Measurement of seabed topography by multibeam sonar using CFFT , 1986 .

[24]  K. M. Houston.  Three-dimensional acoustical imaging using micromechanical hydrophones , 1995, 'Challenges of Our Changing Global Environment'. Conference Proceedings. OCEANS '95 MTS/IEEE.

[25]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[26]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Segmentation and Classification of Range Images , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  Guanghua Zhang,et al.  Physical modeling and combination of range and intensity edge data , 1993 .

[28]  B. Kamgar-Parsi,et al.  3-D acoustic imaging with a thin lens , 1993, Proceedings of OCEANS '93.

[29]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Visual Reconstruction , 1987, Deep Learning for EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces.

[30]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Visual surface reconstruction and boundary detection using stochastic models , 1992, Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol. III. Conference C: Image, Speech and Signal Analysis,.