Towards a Transferable UAV-Based Framework for River Hydromorphological Characterization

The multiple protocols that have been developed to characterize river hydromorphology, partly in response to legislative drivers such as the European Union Water Framework Directive (EU WFD), make the comparison of results obtained in different countries challenging. Recent studies have analyzed the comparability of existing methods, with remote sensing based approaches being proposed as a potential means of harmonizing hydromorphological characterization protocols. However, the resolution achieved by remote sensing products may not be sufficient to assess some of the key hydromorphological features that are required to allow an accurate characterization. Methodologies based on high resolution aerial photography taken from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have been proposed by several authors as potential approaches to overcome these limitations. Here, we explore the applicability of an existing UAV based framework for hydromorphological characterization to three different fluvial settings representing some of the distinct ecoregions defined by the WFD geographical intercalibration groups (GIGs). The framework is based on the automated recognition of hydromorphological features via tested and validated Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Results show that the framework is transferable to the Central-Baltic and Mediterranean GIGs with accuracies in feature identification above 70%. Accuracies of 50% are achieved when the framework is implemented in the Very Large Rivers GIG. The framework successfully identified vegetation, deep water, shallow water, riffles, side bars and shadows for the majority of the reaches. However, further algorithm development is required to ensure a wider range of features (e.g., chutes, structures and erosion) are accurately identified. This study also highlights the need to develop an objective and fit for purpose hydromorphological characterization framework to be adopted within all EU member states to facilitate comparison of results.

[1]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward , 2014 .

[2]  Peter Reichert,et al.  How to make river assessments comparable: A demonstration for hydromorphology , 2013 .

[3]  M. A. Moreno,et al.  Applications of georeferenced high-resolution images obtained with unmanned aerial vehicles. Part I: Description of image acquisition and processing , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[4]  D. Lague,et al.  Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) , 2013, 1302.1183.

[5]  J. F. Ortega,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in onion (Allium cepa L.) using an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2013 .

[6]  Paul Raven,et al.  A review of river habitat characterisation methods: indices vs. characterisation protocols , 2011, Limnetica.

[7]  Pedro Pérez de los Cobos Marín,et al.  Sistema de información agroclimática para el regadío , 2002 .

[8]  P. J. Boon,et al.  Towards a harmonized approach for hydromorphological assessment of rivers in Europe: a qualitative comparison of three survey methods , 2002 .

[9]  N. Surian,et al.  New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Amy Woodget,et al.  The Accuracy and Reliability of Traditional Surface Flow Type Mapping: Is it Time for a New Method of Characterizing Physical River Habitat? , 2016 .

[11]  Salah Sukkarieh,et al.  A Rotary-wing Unmanned Air Vehicle for Aquatic Weed Surveillance and Management , 2010, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[12]  Amy Woodget,et al.  Drones and digital photogrammetry: from classifications to continuums for monitoring river habitat and hydromorphology , 2017 .

[13]  F. Comiti,et al.  Characterising physical habitats and fluvial hydromorphology: A new system for the survey and classification of river geomorphic units , 2017 .

[14]  R. Dunford,et al.  Potential and constraints of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle technology for the characterization of Mediterranean riparian forest , 2009 .

[15]  Susanne Muhar,et al.  Assessing restoration effects on hydromorphology in European mid-sized rivers by key hydromorphological parameters , 2015, Hydrobiologia.

[16]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[17]  Jürgen Böhmer,et al.  Benthic macroinvertebrates in lake ecological assessment: A review of methods, intercalibration and practical recommendations. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Daniele Tonina,et al.  Comparison of hydromorphological assessment methods: Application to the Boise River, USA , 2013 .

[19]  Monica Rivas Casado,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Aerial Imagery Resolution in Automated Hydromorphological River Characterisation , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Hervé Piégay,et al.  Hierarchical Object-Based Mapping of Riverscape Units and in-Stream Mesohabitats Using LiDAR and VHR Imagery , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[21]  R. Grabowski,et al.  The use of remote sensing to characterise hydromorphological properties of European rivers , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[22]  Dimitri Lague,et al.  3D Terrestrial LiDAR data classification of complex natural scenes using a multi-scale dimensionality criterion: applications in geomorphology , 2011, ArXiv.

[23]  Eva Blasco Hedo.  Real Decreto 817/2015, de 11 de septiembre, por el que se establecen los criterios de seguimiento y evaluación del estado de las aguas superficiales y las normas de calidad ambiental , 2015 .

[24]  T. Okruszko,et al.  A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[25]  M. Rinaldi,et al.  A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[26]  Richard E. Brazier,et al.  Water resource management at catchment scales using lightweight UAVs: current capabilities and future perspectives , 2016 .

[27]  H. Piégay,et al.  Hydromorphological frameworks: emerging trajectories , 2015, Aquatic Sciences.

[28]  Other.  Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of The Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy (Water Framework Directive) , 2000 .

[29]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[30]  Joaquín Solana-Gutiérrez,et al.  Automatic procedures for river reach delineation: Univariate and multivariate approaches in a fluvial context , 2016 .

[31]  David Hernández-López,et al.  Approximate georeferencing and automatic blurred image detection to reduce the costs of UAV use in environmental and agricultural applications , 2016 .

[32]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost‐effective non‐metric photogrammetry from consumer‐grade sUAS: implications for direct georeferencing of structure from motion photogrammetry , 2017 .

[33]  Helmut Habersack,et al.  The Hydromorphological Evaluation Tool (HYMET) , 2017 .

[34]  T. Berendonk,et al.  How to assess hydromorphology? A comparison of Ukrainian and German approaches , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[35]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide to European lake ecological assessment and intercalibration , 2015 .

[36]  Monica Rivas Casado,et al.  Automated Identification of River Hydromorphological Features Using UAV High Resolution Aerial Imagery , 2015, Sensors.

[37]  Nigel Holmes,et al.  Benchmarking habitat quality: observations using River Habitat Survey on near‐natural streams and rivers in northern and western Europe , 2010 .

[38]  S. Robson,et al.  Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment , 2016 .