The generalized SEA and a statistical signal processing approach applied to UXO discrimination

The prohibitive costs of excavating all geophysical anomalies are well known and are one of the greatest impediments to efficient clean-up of unexploded ordnance (UXO)-contaminated lands at Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Energy (DOE) sites. Innovative discrimination techniques that can reliably distinguish between hazardous UXO and non-hazardous metallic items are required. The key element to overcoming these difficulties lies in the development of advanced processing techniques that can treat complex data sets to maximize the probability of accurate classification and minimize the false alarm rate. To address these issues, this paper uses a new approach that combines a physically complete EMI forward model called the Generalized Standardized Excitation Approach (GSEA) with a statistical signal processing approach named Mixed Modeling (MM). UXO discrimination requires the inversion of digital geophysical data, which could be divided into two pars: 1) linear - estimating model parameters such as the amplitudes of the responding GSEA sources and 2) non-linear - inverting an object's location and orientation. Usually the data inversion is an ill-posed problem that requires regularization. Determining the regularization parameter is not straightforward, and in many cases depends on personal experience. To overcome this issue, in this paper we employ the statistical approach to estimate regularization parameters from actual data using the un-surprised mixed model approach. In addition, once the non-linear inverse scattering parameters are estimated then for UXO discrimination a covariance matrix and confidence interval are derived. The theoretical basis and practical realization of the combined GSEA-Mixed Model algorithm are demonstrated. Discrimination studies are done for ATC-UXO sets of time-domain EMI data collected at the ERDC UXO test stand site in Vicksburg, Mississippi.

[1]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Simple phenomenological models for wideband frequency-domain electromagnetic induction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter , 1979, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[3]  George Robitaille,et al.  Advanced UXO Detection/Discrimination Technology Demonstration , 2005 .

[4]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Fast data-derived fundamental spheroidal excitation models with application to UXO discrimination , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  M T Lieberman,et al.  Practical Discrimination Strategies for Application to Live Sites , 2009 .

[6]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Analysis of EMI scattering to support UXO discrimination: heterogeneous and multiple objects , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  D. Calvetti,et al.  Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems , 2000 .

[8]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Fast and accurate calculation of physically complete EMI response by a heterogeneous metallic object , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Yacine Dalichaouch,et al.  On the wideband EMI response of a rotationally symmetric permeable and conducting target , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Classification of landmine-like metal targets using wideband electromagnetic induction , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Jin Au Kong,et al.  Application of a spheroidal-mode approach and a differential evolution algorithm for inversion of magneto-quasistatic data in UXO discrimination , 2004 .

[12]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Electromagnetic induction spectroscopy for clearing landmines , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  J. P. Fernández,et al.  Application of the normalized surface magnetic charge model to UXO discrimination in cases with overlapping signals , 2007 .

[14]  Kevin O'Neill,et al.  Combining dipole and mixed model approaches for UXO discrimination , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A Discrimination Algorithm for UXO Using Time Domain Electromagnetics , 2001 .

[16]  Leslie M. Collins,et al.  Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: theory and signal processing , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Herbert H. Nelson,et al.  Enhanced discrimination among UXO-like targets using extremely low-frequency magnetic fields , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Thomas H. Bell,et al.  Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  A New Physics-based Approach for Estimating a Buried Object’s Location, Orientation and Magnetic Polarization from EMI Data , 2008 .

[20]  Carl E. Baum,et al.  On the low-frequency natural response of conducting and permeable targets , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  E. Demidenko,et al.  Mixed Models: Theory and Applications (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2004 .