Discretionary activity location choice: in-home or out-of-home?

This paper examines the location choice associated with discretionary activities (in-home vs. out-of-home). These substitution patterns are important in terms of travel demand as in-home activities do not necessitate travel while out-of-home activities incur travel. Mixed logit models are estimated using an activity dataset (2003 CHASE data) to analyze the factors associated with this choice at the individual activity-level. Results suggest that the attributes of an activity significantly contribute to understanding the likelihood of engaging in out-of-home activities. Activity type interaction terms reveal the varying influence that socio-demographics, activity attributes and travel have over four different activity types modeled. The results reveal that the location choice (in-home vs. out-of-home) is sensitive to travel characteristics. As the travel time and cost increases, an individual is less likely to engage in an activity out-of-home. Compared to passive and social activities, the location of active activities is more sensitive to changes in travel attributes.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research , 1999 .

[2]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Theories and models of activity patterns , 1997 .

[3]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[4]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Design and Assessment of the Toronto Area Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Survey , 2004 .

[5]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary , 2006 .

[6]  R. Kitamura An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis , 1988 .

[7]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Validation of TASHA: A 24-Hour Activity Scheduling Microsimulation Model , 2008 .

[8]  A. M. Lockwood,et al.  On Distinguishing Between Physically Active and Physically Passive Episodes and Between Travel and Activity Episodes: An Analysis of Weekend Recreational Participation in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2004 .

[9]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Computerized Household Activity-Scheduling Survey for Toronto, Canada, Area: Design and Assessment , 2004 .

[10]  A. Passmore,et al.  Development and administration of a measure to assess adolescents' participation in leisure activities. , 2001, Adolescence.

[11]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Social Commitments and Activity-Travel Scheduling Decisions , 2006 .

[12]  Craig R. Rindt,et al.  The Activity-Based Approach , 2008 .

[13]  K. Axhausen,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE WEEKLY HOUSEHOLD ACTIVITY/TRAVEL SCHEDULING PROCESS. IN: TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR: SPATIAL PATTERNS, CONGESTION AND MODELLING , 2002 .

[14]  Susan L Handy,et al.  The Impacts of Ict on leisure Activities and Travel: A Conceptual Exploration , 2006 .

[15]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[16]  M. McNally,et al.  A MODEL OF ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION AND TRAVEL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HOUSEHOLD HEADS , 1996 .

[17]  E I Pas,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING , 1997 .

[18]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  Emerging Travel Patterns , 2002 .

[19]  C. Bhat,et al.  A Mixed Multinomial Logit Model Analysis of Weekend Recreational Episode Type Choice , 2004 .

[20]  Sean T. Doherty Should we abandon activity type analysis? Redefining activities by their salient attributes , 2006 .

[21]  E. I. Pas,et al.  Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior , 1999 .

[22]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[23]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Discretionary activity time allocation of individuals between in-home and out-of-home and between weekdays and weekends , 1999 .

[24]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Joint Model for Perfect and Imperfect Substitute Goods Case: Application to Activity Time-Use Decisions , 2006 .

[25]  H. Mahmassani In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges , 2002 .

[26]  Lothlorien S. Redmond,et al.  The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount , 2001 .

[27]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[28]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  How Derived is the Demand for Travel? Some Conceptual and Measurement Considerations , 2001 .

[29]  P. Toint,et al.  Application of an Adaptive Monte Carlo Algorithm to Mixed Logit Estimation , 2006 .

[30]  R. Kitamura,et al.  An analysis of time allocation to in-home and out-of-home discretionary activities across working days and non- working days , 1999 .

[31]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling , 2003 .

[32]  Susan L Handy,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES ON NONWORK TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1997 .

[33]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Model of Activity Participation Between Household Heads , 1997 .

[34]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DEMAND MODELING AND VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME. INTRODUCTION , 1974 .