Comparison of spine, carina, and tumor as registration landmarks for volumetric image-guided lung radiotherapy.

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility, reproducibility, and accuracy of volumetric lung image guidance using different thoracic landmarks for image registration. METHODS AND MATERIALS In 30 lung patients, four independent observers conducted automated and manual image registrations on Day 1 cone-beam computed tomography data sets using the spine, carina, and tumor (720 image registrations). The image registration was timed, and the couch displacements were recorded. The intraclass correlation was used to assess reproducibility, and the Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare the automatic and manual matching methods. Tumor coverage (accuracy) was assessed through grading the tumor position after image matching against the internal target volume and planning target volume. RESULTS The image-guided process took an average of 1 min for all techniques, with the exception of manual tumor matching, which took 4 min. Reproducibility was greatest for automatic carina matching (intraclass correlation, 0.90-0.93) and lowest for manual tumor matching (intraclass correlation, 0.07-0.43) in the left-right, superoinferior, and anteroposterior directions, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant difference between the automatic and manual registration methods. The tumor was within the internal target volume 62% and 60% of the time and was outside the internal target volume, but within the planning target volume, 38% and 40% of the time after automatic spine and automatic carina matching, respectively. CONCLUSION For advanced lung cancer, the spine or carina can be used equally for cone-beam computed tomography image registration without compromising target coverage. The carina was more reproducible than the spine, but additional analysis is required to confirm its validation as a tumor surrogate. Soft-tissue registration is unsuitable at present, given the limitations in contrast resolution and the high interobserver variability.

[1]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for lung tumors: preliminary report of a phase I trial. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Serial megavoltage CT imaging during external beam radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: observations on tumor regression during treatment. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Wolfgang A Tomé,et al.  Tumor volume changes on serial imaging with megavoltage CT for non-small-cell lung cancer during intensity-modulated radiotherapy: how reliable, consistent, and meaningful is the effect? , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  M. Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: technical implementation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography guidance for setup of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  S Senan,et al.  An analysis of anatomic landmark mobility and setup deviations in radiotherapy for lung cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  A technique for adaptive image-guided helical tomotherapy for lung cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Review of image-guided radiation therapy , 2007, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[10]  W. Sause,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using implanted fiducial markers with daily portal imaging: assessment of prostate organ motion. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  S. Vaughndill.  TUMOR AND NORMAL TISSUE MOTION IN THE THORAX DURING RESPIRATION: ANALYSIS OF VOLUMETRIC AND POSITIONAL VARIATIONS USING 4D CT , 2007 .

[12]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  E. Waclawski.  Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use , 2010 .

[14]  V. Moiseenko,et al.  Internal fiducial markers can assist dose escalation in treatment of prostate cancer: result of organ motion simulations , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography setup measurements for lung cancer patients; first clinical results and comparison with electronic portal-imaging device. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image guidance of lung stereotactic radiotherapy: localization, verification, and intrafraction tumor position. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  V. Khoo,et al.  X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: the new standard in on-treatment imaging. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[20]  T. Rosewall,et al.  Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  C. Rübe,et al.  Postoperative radiotherapy in localized non-small cell lung cancer. , 2001, Lung Cancer.

[22]  S. Senan,et al.  Analysis of carina position as surrogate marker for delivering phase-gated radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  C. Ling,et al.  Improved local control with higher doses of radiation in large-volume stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: a cone-beam CT study. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Koichi Yamazaki,et al.  Insertion and fixation of fiducial markers for setup and tracking of lung tumors in radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  J. V. van Meerbeeck,et al.  Has 3-D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) improved the local tumour control for stage I non-small cell lung cancer? , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  T. Krieger,et al.  How can we further improve radiotherapy for stage-III non-small-cell lung cancer? , 2004, Lung cancer.

[29]  George Starkschall,et al.  Assessment of gross tumor volume regression and motion changes during radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer as measured by four-dimensional computed tomography. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[32]  Robert D Timmerman,et al.  The North American Experience with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[33]  S. Senan,et al.  2158 An analysis of anatomic landmark mobility and setup errors in radiotherapy for lung cancer , 1997 .

[34]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Cone-beam CT based image-guidance for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary tumors , 2006, Acta oncologica.

[35]  N. Choi,et al.  Radiation dose escalation in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.