A Ludic Perspective on Everyday Practices: Evidence from Ethnographic Fieldwork

In this paper we introduce Johan Huizinga’s ludic perspective to information systems research with the aim to understand large complex social phenomena, specifically how the younger generation interacts with technology in their everyday organizational practices. Against an anthropological background, we employ Huizinga’s ludic approach to grasp everyday practices using the concept of play. We specifically invoke this novel concept in an ongoing critical ethnography of young professionals’ everyday encounters with IT in a large organization. Our findings endorse the idea that young people seem to be at play with IT in their everyday practices. This paper adds two contributions to IS research: first, it introduces Huizinga’s ludic perspective as a framework to help understand everyday practice; second, the organizational ethnographic evidence sheds light on the practical intricacies from young people’s perspective, thus placing the use of IT in the broader context of everyday practices of the younger generation.

[1]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[2]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[3]  Shahper Vodanovich,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Natives and Ubiquitous Information Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[5]  S. Spoelstra,et al.  Play at work: continuation, intervention and usurpation , 2012 .

[6]  Jörgen Sandberg GRASPING THE LOGIC OF PRACTICE : THEORIZING THROUGH PRACTICAL RATIONALITY , 2011 .

[7]  Charalampos Mainemelis,et al.  When The Muse Takes It All: A Model For The Experience of Timelessness in Organizations , 2001 .

[8]  David Sundaram,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 5-2-2012 DIGITAL NATIVES AND DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS : TOWARDS A MODEL OF DIGITAL FLUENCY , 2013 .

[9]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[10]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[11]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[12]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  M. Sicart Digital Games as Ethical Technologies , 2012 .

[14]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  The digital native - myth and reality , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[15]  J. Huizinga Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[16]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[17]  R. Kark Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development , 2011 .

[18]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[19]  John F. Sherry,et al.  Ludic Agency and Retail Spectacle , 2004 .

[20]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Matt Statler,et al.  Playing seriously with strategy , 2004 .

[22]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Assimilating Generation Y IT New Hires into USAA's Workforce: The Role of an Enterprise 2.0 System , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[23]  Karl Mannheim,et al.  The Problem of Generations (1928) , 1996 .

[24]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  F. Grey,et al.  Playing seriously with strategy , 2004 .

[26]  Mark Western,et al.  Beneath the ‘Digital Native’ myth , 2013 .