Random number generation and working memory

We demonstrate the close relationship that exists between random sequence generation and working memory functioning. We clarify the nature of this link by examining the impact of concurrent requirements for random sequence response quality. Experiments 1A and 1B show that marking specific response choices for differential treatment, either by requiring an ancillary behaviour or by suppressing these choices from output, impairs overall sequence quality. Contrasting with previous findings, these distinct concurrent tasks have comparable effects. We show that disruption is found only when concurrent demand is high. Experiment 2 demonstrates that increasing the dynamic working memory load by requiring the ancillary response to change during the task leads to additional disruption of randomisation. The results extend and refine our understanding of the contribution of active maintenance of representations in random generation.

[1]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Suppressing versus releasing a habit: frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  P. Brugger.  Variables That Influence the Generation of Random Sequences: An Update , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  J. Duncan,et al.  Intelligence and the Frontal Lobe: The Organization of Goal-Directed Behavior , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  A. Vandierendonck.  Is judgment of random time intervals biased and capacity-limited? , 2000, Psychological research.

[6]  J. Towse,et al.  An exploration of random generation among children , 1999 .

[7]  M. C. Fastame,et al.  Working memory components of the Corsi blocks task. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[8]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[10]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  The Effects of Total Sleep Deprivation on the Generation of Random Sequences of Key-Presses, Numbers and Nouns , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[12]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  C. Lustig,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention , 2007 .

[14]  J. Towse,et al.  Reflections on the concept of the central executive , 2001 .

[15]  Pierre L’Ecuyer,et al.  Random Number Generation , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[16]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[18]  N. Ginsburg,et al.  Random Generation: Analysis of the Responses , 1994 .

[19]  John N. Towse,et al.  Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance , 1998 .

[20]  A Baddeley,et al.  Random Generation and the Executive Control of Working Memory , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[22]  Y. Kareev.  Through a narrow window: working memory capacity and the detection of covariation , 1995, Cognition.

[23]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Verbal Reasoning and Working Memory , 1976 .

[24]  J. Towse.  On random generation and the central executive of working memory. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[25]  P. Brugger,et al.  Random number generation in dementia of the Alzheimer type: A test of frontal executive functions , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G. S. Tune.  A Brief Survey of Variables That Influence Random-Generation , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  Andre Vandierendonck Gino De Vooght Koen Van der Goten.  Does Random Time Interval Generation Interfere with Working Memory Executive Functions , 1998 .

[28]  W. Wagenaar,et al.  The perception of randomness , 1991 .

[29]  D. Wegner.  Ironic processes of mental control. , 1994, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Towse,et al.  Random Generation of Numbers: A Search for Underlying Processes , 1997 .