Optimal topology design using A global self-organisational approach

Abstract A method based on a self-organisational approach has been developed, where a local state operator defines the state of each finite element at each iteration. The algorithm is based on the principle of local adaptation with global feedback in the form of a derivative equation based on von Mises stresses that allows the local remodelling function to vary at each time step. The state operator has the form of a nonlinear differential equation solved iteratively based on the material density and strain energy density within each element. A constraint equation is formulated based on a maximum deviatoric strain energy criteria, with the objective to minimise the mass of the design domain subject to the above constraint. A number of examples are presented to demonstrate the use of this approach.

[1]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  C. S. Jog,et al.  Topology design with optimized, self‐adaptive materials , 1994 .

[3]  Timothy P. Harrigan,et al.  Finite element simulation of adaptive bone remodelling: A stability criterion and a time stepping method , 1993 .

[4]  S C Cowin,et al.  Chaos in the discrete-time algorithm for bone-density remodeling rate equations. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  J J Hamilton,et al.  An analytical and numerical study of the stability of bone remodelling theories: dependence on microstructural stimulus. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Optimal topology design using linear programming , 1994 .

[8]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  C. Mattheck,et al.  A new method of structural shape optimization based on biological growth , 1990 .

[10]  C. Mattheck,et al.  Computational methods for the understanding of biological optimization mechanisms , 1993 .

[11]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[12]  Robert V. Kohn,et al.  Optimal design in elasticity and plasticity , 1986 .

[13]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  On CAD-integrated structural topology and design optimization , 1991 .

[14]  H. Mlejnek,et al.  An engineer's approach to optimal material distribution and shape finding , 1993 .

[15]  D. Carter Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J J Hamilton,et al.  Bone remodeling and structural optimization. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[18]  Timothy P. Harrigan,et al.  Necessary and sufficient conditions for global stability and uniqueness in finite element simulations of adaptive bone remodeling , 1994 .

[19]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization , 1991 .

[20]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[21]  C. Mattheck,et al.  SKO (soft kill option): the biological way to find an optimum structure topology , 1992 .

[22]  A. Sadegh,et al.  An evolutionary Wolff's law for trabecular architecture. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Timothy P. Harrigan,et al.  Optimality conditions for finite element simulation of adaptive bone remodeling , 1992 .