An improved approach to evaluate car sharing options

Abstract We develop an improved approach to evaluate car sharing options under uncertain environments with the combination of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) and Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS), which consists of three steps. In the first step, we propose a SCUMN (Specific, Comprehensive, Understandable, Measurable, and Neutral) methodology to identify appropriate indicators and obtain a final list of 24 indicators according to their relevance to car sharing options. In the second step, we determine the weight of each indicator with F-AHP and conduct consistency check of the comparison matrix of selected indicators. In the third step, comparison of different options is performed with selected indicators and F-TOPSIS. A case study is provided to validate the proposed approach. Twenty-four indicators are identified to evaluate five different car sharing options and rank them according to their closeness coefficients in decreasing order. And thirty-one sensitivity analysis experiments are conducted to figure out the influence of indicators on decision making. The experimental results show that the proposed approach is capable of evaluating car sharing options with uncertainty and vagueness. F-AHP is able to determine the weight for each selected indicator and F-TOPSIS demonstrates its advantage in comparing potential options.

[1]  C. L. Wu,et al.  Development of sustainability evaluation model for implementing product service systems , 2012, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[2]  David Pitfield,et al.  AN ECONOMIC AND OPERATIONAL EVALUATION OF URBAN CAR-SHARING , 2000 .

[3]  Suihuai Yu,et al.  State-of-the-art of design, evaluation, and operation methodologies in product service systems , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[4]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Synopsis of Users’ Behaviour of a Carsharing Program: A Case Study in Toronto , 2012 .

[5]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP , 2003 .

[6]  Todd Litman,et al.  Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning , 2005 .

[7]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[10]  H. Haghshenas,et al.  Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison , 2012 .

[11]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[12]  Duk Hee Lee,et al.  Analysis of the energy and environmental effects of green car deployment by an integrating energy system model with a forecasting model , 2013 .

[13]  Colin J. Axon,et al.  A methodology for measuring the sustainability of car transport systems , 2013 .

[14]  Niamh Rabbitt,et al.  A Study on Feasibility and Potential Benefits of Organized Carsharing in Ireland , 2013 .

[15]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .

[16]  Dominique Gillis,et al.  How to Monitor Sustainable Mobility in Cities? Literature Review in the Frame of Creating a Set of Sustainable Mobility Indicators , 2015 .

[17]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A simulation tool for prioritizing product-service system (PSS) models in a carsharing service , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[18]  Christy Mihyeon Jeon,et al.  Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics , 2005 .

[19]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[20]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework , 2013 .

[21]  Chia-Chi Sun,et al.  A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Tomasz Wachowicz,et al.  Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  A. Tukker Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet , 2004 .

[24]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities , 2015 .

[25]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Niels A. H. Agatz,et al.  The Value of Optimization in Dynamic Ride-Sharing: A Simulation Study in Metro Atlanta , 2010 .

[27]  Martin Müller,et al.  What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm , 2011 .

[28]  Robert Joumard,et al.  Transport project assessment methodology within the framework of sustainable development , 2010 .

[29]  Richard Katzev,et al.  Car Sharing: A New Approach to Urban Transportation Problems , 2003 .

[30]  Wenyan Song,et al.  An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments , 2013 .

[31]  Michael Glotz-Richter Car-Sharing – “Car-on-call” for reclaiming street space , 2012 .

[32]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings , 2004 .

[33]  Tamás Szabó,et al.  The marriage of car sharing and hydrogen economy: A possible solution to the main problems of urban , 2010 .

[34]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  The Analytic hierarchy process : applications and studies , 1989 .

[35]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..