Public perception of the tax on sweetened beverages in France

Abstract Objective: To assess in 2021 the acceptance and perception of the French tax on sweetened beverages, following its revision in 2018, and factors associated with a higher level of acceptance. Design: A cross-sectional survey within the NutriNet-Santé cohort study. Participants were invited to complete a self-reported questionnaire in March 2021. Weighting was applied to the sample to allow inferences on the French population. Individual characteristics associated with support for the tax were investigated using logistic regression modelling. Settings: NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort study. Participants: Adults engaged in the NutriNet-Santé cohort, aged 18 years or older (n 28 344), living in mainland France. Results: Almost two-thirds (63·4 %) of the participants were aware of the existence of a tax on sweetened beverages, although less than a quarter had specific knowledge regarding its design and the 2018 revision. In turn, 64·7 % of participants expressed a favourable opinion towards the taxation scheme. This proportion was higher if tax revenues were used to finance health-related measures (respectively 68·8 % of favourable opinion if used to finance a reduction in prices of healthy products and 76·4 % if used to finance the healthcare system). Multivariable analyses showed that support towards the tax varied among subgroups of the population. Groups who tended to be less financially affected by the measure and those who perceived sugar-sweetened beverages as having detrimental effects were more likely to support the tax. Conclusion: The revised French sugar-sweetened beverage tax appeared to be favourably received and perceived by the public.

[1]  C. Julia,et al.  Public health lessons from the French 2012 soda tax and insights on the modifications enacted in 2018. , 2022, Health policy.

[2]  Kristine A. Madsen,et al.  Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  J. Chhimwal,et al.  Beverages and Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Think before you drink. , 2021, Clinical nutrition.

[4]  Marius Claudy,et al.  Are Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes Effective? Reviewing the Evidence Through a Marketing Systems Lens , 2020 .

[5]  T. Doran,et al.  Effect of sugar-sweetened beverages on oral health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, European Journal of Public Health.

[6]  M. V. van Stralen,et al.  Public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and its associated factors in the Netherlands , 2020, Public Health Nutrition.

[7]  E. von der Lippe,et al.  Association between Living with Children and the Health and Health Behavior of Women and Men. Are There Differences by Age? Results of the “German Health Update” (GEDA) Study , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  K. Corder,et al.  Becoming a parent: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of changes in BMI, diet, and physical activity , 2020, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[9]  F. Gagnon,et al.  Conditions influencing the adoption of a soda tax for public health: Analysis of the French case (2005–2012) , 2019, Food Policy.

[10]  L. Schoonmade,et al.  Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[11]  F. Hu,et al.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Cardiometabolic Health: An Update of the Evidence , 2019, Nutrients.

[12]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Global patterns in price elasticities of sugar-sweetened beverage intake and potential effectiveness of tax policy: a cross-sectional study of 164 countries by sex, age and global-income decile , 2019, BMJ Open.

[13]  Andrea M Teng,et al.  Impact of sugar‐sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: Systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2019, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[14]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages , 2019, BMJ Open.

[15]  Jean Adams,et al.  Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[16]  C. Bell,et al.  What young Australians think about a tax on sugar‐sweetened beverages , 2018, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[17]  T. Shamah-Levy,et al.  Does the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax have a signaling effect? ENSANUT 2016 , 2018, PloS one.

[18]  S. Colagiuri,et al.  Public support for government regulatory interventions for overweight and obesity in Australia , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[19]  T. Dwyer,et al.  Associations between Partnering and Parenting Transitions and Dietary Habits in Young Adults. , 2017, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[20]  C. Thongprayoon,et al.  Sugar and artificially sweetened beverages linked to obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[21]  N. Klazinga,et al.  The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies. , 2017, Health policy.

[22]  Katherine E. Smith,et al.  Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[23]  R. Coelho.  Sugar-sweetened beverages and fruit juice consumption in obesity , 2017 .

[24]  Kristine A. Madsen,et al.  Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption. , 2016, American journal of public health.

[25]  T. Marteau,et al.  Public Acceptability in the UK and USA of Nudging to Reduce Obesity: The Example of Reducing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Consumption , 2016, PloS one.

[26]  R. Keizer,et al.  Physical activity and sport participation: A systematic review of the impact of fatherhood , 2016, Preventive medicine reports.

[27]  N. Forouhi,et al.  Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Peilin Shi,et al.  Global, Regional, and National Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Fruit Juices, and Milk: A Systematic Assessment of Beverage Intake in 187 Countries , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  N. Campbell,et al.  Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence. , 2015, Nutrition.

[30]  S. Hercberg,et al.  Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics of the large NutriNet-Santé e-cohort with French Census data: the issue of volunteer bias revisited , 2015, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[31]  Y. Le Bodo,et al.  Is Sugar the new Tobacco? Insights from Laboratory Studies, Consumer Surveys and Public Health , 2015, Current Obesity Reports.

[32]  S. Hercberg,et al.  Public perception and characteristics related to acceptance of the sugar-sweetened beverage taxation launched in France in 2012 , 2015, Public Health Nutrition.

[33]  N. Kanarek,et al.  Public support for a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and pro-tax messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state , 2014, Public Health Nutrition.

[34]  Bhavani Shankar,et al.  What is the public appetite for healthy eating policies? Evidence from a cross-European survey , 2014, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[35]  J. Niederdeppe,et al.  Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[36]  M. Suhrcke,et al.  Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[37]  L. Snetselaar,et al.  Changes in diet behavior when adults become parents. , 2012, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[38]  J. Mann,et al.  Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies , 2012, BMJ.

[39]  S. Henauw,et al.  Determinants of nutrition knowledge in young and middle-aged Belgian women and the association with their dietary behaviour , 2009, Appetite.

[40]  F. Barigozzi,et al.  The signaling effect of tax policy , 2006 .

[41]  P. Burstein.  The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda , 2003 .

[42]  P. Robson,et al.  Attitudes towards and beliefs about nutrition and health among a random sample of adults in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland , 2001, Public Health Nutrition.

[43]  A. Spiller,et al.  Public acceptability of government interventions to reduce obesity: policy effectiveness, policy fairness, government trust and political ideology , 2020, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[44]  Addendum A L’AVIS.  Haut Conseil de la santé publique , 2011 .

[45]  M. Touvier,et al.  The Nutrinet-Santé Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status , 2010 .