Personal thoracic CIP10-T sampler and its static version Cathia-T

Abstract A specific version of the personal aerosol sampler CIP 10 was designed, named CIP10-T, for sampling the conventional CEN thoracic fraction. A static sampler, named CATHIA, was also designed. It uses the same sampling head, but the size selected particles are collected onto a filter. The combined particle efficiency of the aspiration slot and the selector was measured in a horizontal wind tunnel at low air velocity, close to 16 cm s −1 . The flow rate of both samplers was fixed at its nominal value, i.e., 7 l min −1 . Two different methods were used: the former was based on the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (TSI); the latter used the measurement of particle size distribution of the collected samples by the Coulter technique. For the CIP10-T sampler, the particle collection efficiency onto the rotating cup was also measured. For both samplers bias and accuracy maps have been calculated, following the recommendations of a new CEN standard about sampler performance. The bias does not exceed 10% in absolute value for both samplers, within a large range of particle size distribution of the total aerosol. For the CIP10-T sampler, the accuracy map exhibits a large area where the accuracy is better than 10%, corresponding for example to 4  μ m≤MMAD≤14  μ m for GSD=2. For the same geometric standard deviation, the accuracy is still better than 20% for 15  μ m≤MMAD≤21  μ m. For the CATHIA-T sampler, the accuracy map can be roughly divided into two parts. The accuracy remains better than 10% for MMAD≤12  μ m, and it remains between 10 and 20% for coarser aerosols, with 13  μ m≤MMAD≤20  μ m, provided GSD≥2.

[1]  B. T. Chen,et al.  Behaviour of isometric nonspherical aerosol particles in the aerodynamic particle sizer , 1990 .

[2]  P. Görner,et al.  Photometer measurement of polydisperse aerosols , 1995 .

[3]  Jean-Francois Fabries,et al.  A NEW INDIVIDUAL RESPIRABLE DUST SAMPLER: THE CIP 10 , 1988 .

[4]  P. Brochard,et al.  The use of a new static device based on the collection of the thoracic fraction for the assessment of the airborne concentration of asbestos fibres by transmission electron microscopy. , 1996, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  D. Bartley,et al.  The performance evaluation of aerosol samplers tested with monodisperse aerosols , 1995 .

[6]  O. Levenspiel,et al.  Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles , 1989 .

[7]  J H Vincent,et al.  A new personal sampler for airborne total dust in workplaces. , 1986, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Hwa-Chi Wang,et al.  A Simple Iteration Procedure to Correct for the Density Effect in the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer , 1989 .

[9]  W. D. Griffiths,et al.  Behavior of Compact Nonspherical Particles in the TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer Model APS33B: Ultra-Stokesian Drag Forces , 1993 .

[10]  Goran Liden,et al.  Evaluation of the SKC Personal Respirable Dust Sampling Cyclone , 1993 .

[11]  K. J. Caplan,et al.  Performance characteristics of the 10 mm cyclone respirable mass sampler: part I--monodisperse studies. , 1977, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  T. Fischbach,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Analyzing Sampling and Analytical Methods , 1993 .

[13]  J. Fabries,et al.  Equipment for the study of air sampling instruments with real time measurement of the aerosol concentration , 1984 .

[14]  John E. Brockmann,et al.  APS Response to Nonspherical Particles and Experimental Determination of Dynamic Shape Factor , 1990 .

[15]  Ruiguang Song,et al.  Respirable Aerosol Sampler Performance Testing , 1994 .

[16]  James H. Vincent,et al.  Application of Porous Foams as Size Selectors for Biologically Relevant Samplers , 1993 .

[17]  K. Willeke,et al.  A general equation for aerosol aspiration by thin-walled sampling probes in calm and moving air , 1993 .