Real-World Energy Use and Emission Rates for Idling Long-Haul Trucks and Selected Idle Reduction Technologies

Abstract Long-haul freight trucks typically idle for 2000 or more hours per year, motivating interest in reducing idle fuel use and emissions using auxiliary power units (APUs) and shore-power (SP). Fuel-use rates are estimated based on electronic control unit (ECU) data for truck engines and measurements for APU engines. Engine emission factors were measured using a portable emission measurement system. Indirect emissions from SP were based on average utility grid emission factors. Base engine fuel use and APU and SP electrical load were analyzed for 20 trucks monitored for more than 1 yr during 2.76 million mi of activity within 42 U.S. states. The average base engine fuel use varied from 0.46 to 0.65 gal/hr. The average APU fuel use varied from 0.24 to 0.41 gal/hr. Fuel-use rates are typically lowest in mild weather, highest in hot or cold weather, and depend on engine speed (revolutions per minute [RPM]). Compared with the base engine, APU fuel use and emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) are lower by 36–47%. Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions are lower by 80–90%. Reductions in particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), and hydrocarbon emissions vary from approximately 10 to over 50%. SP leads to more substantial reductions, except for SO2. The actual achievable reductions will be lower because only a fraction of base engine usage will be replaced by APUs, SP, or both. Recommendations are made for reducing base engine fuel use and emissions, accounting for variability in fuel use and emissions reductions, and further work to quantify real-world avoided fuel use and emissions.

[1]  J. Dieckmann,et al.  Study of long term options for electric vehicle air conditioning , 1991 .

[2]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Real-World Duty Cycles and Utilization for Construction Equipment in North Carolina , 2008 .

[3]  Han Lim Study of Exhaust Emissions from Idling Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks and Commercially Available Idle-Reducing Devices , 2002 .

[4]  Anant D Vyas,et al.  Analysis of technology options to reduce the fuel consumption of idling trucks , 2000 .

[5]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  Quantification of Variability and Uncertainty for Censored Data Sets and Application to Air Toxic Emission Factors , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Christie-Joy Brodrick,et al.  Effects of Engine Speed and Accessory Load on Idling Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Engines , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  R L McCormick,et al.  Idle Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel and Natural Gas Vehicles at High Altitude , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  Christie-Joy Brodrick,et al.  Heavy-Duty Truck Idling Characteristics: Results from a Nationwide Truck Survey , 2004 .

[9]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  Methodology for characterization of long-haul truck idling activity under real-world conditions , 2008 .

[10]  J. Hearne,et al.  The Effect of Ambient Temperature, Humidity, and Engine Speed on Idling Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks , 2003 .

[11]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Idle Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles: Review and Recent Data , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  John M. E. Storey,et al.  Particulate Matter and Aldehyde Emissions from Idling Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks , 2003 .

[13]  Khaled Ksaibati,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF TEMPERATURE FLUCTUATIONS IN ASPHALT PAVEMENTS DUE TO THERMAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS USING A TWO-DIMENSIONAL TRANSIENT FINITE DIFFERENCE APPROACH , 2005 .

[14]  Hansol Lim,et al.  Study of Exhaust Emissions from Idling Heavy Duty Diesel Trucks and Commercially Available Idle Reducing Devices , 2003 .