Inverse problem approaches for digital hologram reconstruction

Digital holography (DH) is being increasingly used for its time-resolved three-dimensional (3-D) imaging capabilities. A 3-D volume can be numerically reconstructed from a single 2-D hologram. Applications of DH range from experimental mechanics, biology, and fluid dynamics. Improvement and characterization of the 3-D reconstruction algorithms is a current issue. Over the past decade, numerous algorithms for the analysis of holograms have been proposed. They are mostly based on a common approach to hologram processing: digital reconstruction based on the simulation of hologram diffraction. They suffer from artifacts intrinsic to holography: twin-image contamination of the reconstructed images, image distortions for objects located close to the hologram borders. The analysis of the reconstructed planes is therefore limited by these defects. In contrast to this approach, the inverse problems perspective does not transform the hologram but performs object detection and location by matching a model of the hologram. Information is thus extracted from the hologram in an optimal way, leading to two essential results: an improvement of the axial accuracy and the capability to extend the reconstructed field beyond the physical limit of the sensor size (out-of-field reconstruction). These improvements come at the cost of an increase of the computational load compared to (typically non iterative) classical approaches.

[1]  Ferréol Soulez,et al.  Inverse-problem approach for particle digital holography: accurate location based on local optimization. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Michael Unser,et al.  Autofocus for digital Fresnel holograms by use of a Fresnelet-sparsity criterion. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Thomas J. Naughton,et al.  Resolution limits in practical digital holographic systems , 2009 .

[4]  J. Olivo-Marin,et al.  Off-axis compressed holographic microscopy in low-light conditions. , 2011, Optics letters.

[5]  O Monnom,et al.  Border processing in digital holography by extension of the digital hologram and reduction of the higher spatial frequencies. , 2002, Applied optics.

[6]  Dominique Jeulin,et al.  Reconstruction of the rose of directions from a digital microhologram of fibres , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  Loïc Denis,et al.  Inline hologram reconstruction with sparsity constraints. , 2009, Optics letters.

[8]  E. Cuche,et al.  Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. , 2005, Optics letters.

[9]  Peter Klages,et al.  Digital in-line holographic microscopy. , 2006, Applied optics.

[10]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Jeffrey A Fessler,et al.  Penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for digital holography. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  Hui Meng,et al.  Digital holography of particle fields: reconstruction by use of complex amplitude. , 2003, Applied optics.

[13]  Adriaan van den Bos,et al.  Resolution: a survey , 1997 .

[14]  Cafer Ozkul,et al.  Application of wavelet transform to hologram analysis: three-dimensional location of particles , 2000 .

[15]  Mokrane Malek,et al.  Digital in-line holography for three-dimensional two-components particle tracking velocimetry , 2004 .

[16]  D. Lorenz,et al.  Greedy solution of ill-posed problems: error bounds and exact inversion , 2009, 0904.0154.

[17]  Gozde Bozdagi Akar,et al.  Digital computation of the fractional Fourier transform , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  Ferréol Soulez,et al.  Inverse problem approach in particle digital holography: out-of-field particle detection made possible. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Fook Chiong Cheong,et al.  Strategies for three-dimensional particle tracking with holographic video microscopy. , 2010, Optics express.

[20]  Thierry Fournel,et al.  On the single point resolution of on-axis digital holography. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  Compressed Sensing with off-axis frequency-shifting holography , 2010, Optics letters.

[22]  Thierry Blu,et al.  Fresnelets: new multiresolution wavelet bases for digital holography , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[23]  Christophe Ducottet,et al.  Digital in-line holography: influence of the reconstruction function on the axial profile of a reconstructed particle image , 2004 .

[24]  B. Javidi,et al.  Analysis of practical sampling and reconstruction from Fresnel fields , 2004 .

[25]  Pierre Marquet,et al.  DHM (Digital Holography Microscope) for imaging cells , 2007 .

[26]  T. Kreis Handbook of Holographic Interferometry: Optical and Digital Methods , 2004 .

[27]  Christophe Ducottet,et al.  Digital holography of particles: benefits of the ‘inverse problem’ approach , 2008 .

[28]  P. Pellat-Finet Fresnel diffraction and the fractional-order Fourier transform. , 1994, Optics letters.

[29]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Improved-resolution digital holography using the generalized sampling theorem for locally band-limited fields. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  Julia Lobera,et al.  Optical tomography and digital holography , 2008 .

[31]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[32]  Shigeru Murata,et al.  Potential of digital holography in particle measurement , 2000 .

[33]  R. Kiss,et al.  Digital holographic microscopy for the three-dimensional dynamic analysis of in vitro cancer cell migration. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[34]  Ting-Chung Poon,et al.  Digital holography--coherent optics of the 21st century: introduction , 2006 .

[35]  L. Onural,et al.  Sampling of the diffraction field. , 2000, Applied optics.

[36]  Daniel L Marks,et al.  Compressive holography. , 2009, Optics express.

[37]  Deanna Needell,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, ArXiv.

[38]  J. Katz,et al.  Applications of Holography in Fluid Mechanics and Particle Dynamics , 2010 .

[39]  Catherine Yourassowsky,et al.  Focus plane detection criteria in digital holography microscopy by amplitude analysis. , 2006, Optics express.

[40]  Patrick Sandoz,et al.  High resolution digital holography , 2001 .

[41]  Patrick Sandoz,et al.  Sampling of two-dimensional images: prevention from spectrum overlap and ghost detection , 2004 .

[42]  Etienne Cuche,et al.  Aperture apodization using cubic spline interpolation: application in digital holographic microscopy , 2000 .

[43]  Sailes K. Sengijpta Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory , 1995 .

[44]  J. Högbom,et al.  APERTURE SYNTHESIS WITH A NON-REGULAR DISTRIBUTION OF INTERFEROMETER BASELINES. Commentary , 1974 .

[45]  Klaus D. Hinsch,et al.  Signal quality improvements by short-coherence holographic particle image velocimetry , 2004 .

[46]  Jeremy M. Coupland Holographic particle image velocimetry: signal recovery from under-sampled CCD data , 2004 .

[47]  Seung-Man Yang,et al.  Characterizing and tracking single colloidal particles with video holographic microscopy. , 2007, Optics express.

[48]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Space-bandwidth conditions for efficient phase-shifting digital holographic microscopy. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.