Achieving benefit for patients in primary care informatics: the report of a international consensus workshop at Medinfo 2007.

BACKGROUND Landmark reports suggest that sharing health data between clinical computer systems should improve patient safety and the quality of care. Enhancing the use of informatics in primary care is usually a key part of these strategies. AIM To synthesise the learning from the international use of informatics in primary care. METHOD The workshop was attended by 21 delegates drawn from all continents. There were presentations from USA, UK and the Netherlands, and informal updates from Australia, Argentina, and Sweden and the Nordic countries. These presentations were discussed in a workshop setting to identify common issues. Key principles were synthesised through a post-workshop analysis and then sorted into themes. RESULTS Themes emerged about the deployment of informatics which can be applied at health service, practice and individual clinical consultation level: 1 At the health service or provider level, success appeared proportional to the extent of collaboration between a broad range of stakeholders and identification of leaders. 2 Within the practice much is currently being achieved with legacy computer systems and apparently outdated coding systems. This includes prescribing safety alerts, clinical audit and promoting computer data recording and quality. 3 In the consultation the computer is a 'big player' and may make traditional models of the consultation redundant. CONCLUSIONS We should make more efforts to share learning; develop clear internationally acceptable definitions; highlight gaps between pockets of excellence and real-world practice, and most importantly suggest how they might be bridged. Knowledge synthesis from different health systems may provide a greater understanding of how the third actor (the computer) is best used in primary care.

[1]  Sebastian Garde,et al.  Towards Semantic Interoperability for Electronic Health Records , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[2]  D. Berwick,et al.  Improvement, trust, and the healthcare workforce* , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[3]  Diane L. Seger,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Improving Acceptance of Computerized Prescribing Alerts in Ambulatory Care , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Jeremy C. Wyatt,et al.  Reviewing the integration of patient data: how systems are evolving in practice to meet patient needs , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[5]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[6]  C. Weel,et al.  The need for research in primary care , 2003, The Lancet.

[7]  D. Bates,et al.  Comprehensive computerised primary care records are an essential component of any national health information strategy: report from an international consensus conference. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[8]  K. Mendis,et al.  PubMed perspective of family medicine research: where does it stand? , 2005, Family practice.

[9]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  David W. Bates,et al.  Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: A time-motion study , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  Donald M Berwick,et al.  Errors today and errors tomorrow. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  S de Lusignan Introduction to the Primary Care Informatics Working Group of the European Federation for Medical , 2003 .

[13]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[14]  E. Coiera Four rules for the reinvention of health care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Marvin C. Alkin,et al.  What Have We Learned? , 2019, Stumbling Blocks Against Unification.

[16]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.