Robust Virtual Keyboard for Brain-Computer Interface (ROBIK): An Halfway Update on the Project

The principle of a Brain-Computer Interface or BCI is to control a device through the extraction and interpretation of signal features from electroencephalograms (EEG) collected either from the surface of the scalp or through invasive measurements. This late idea of communication technique (Vidal 1973), offers the advantage of bypassing the need for muscle activity in the control chain and is therefore presented as a promising alternative to restore communication and control in severely disabled patients (Wolpow, et al. 2002). However, the lack of robustness and ergonomics of both available software and EEG measurement techniques have delayed the transfer of this technology to patients bedsides. The French Research Agency has funded a 3-year project gathering national leaders in microelectronics (CEA-Leti), EEG signal processing (Gipsa-Lab) and clinical management of severely disabled people (Raymond Poincar hospital). The aim of the project is the development and the clinical validation of a Brain-Computer Interface prototype for communication. As an initial step, a survey was carried out to assess patients' and users (family and caretakers) needs, which were translated into specifications, on the basis of which software and hardware were developed. The survey (n=45) highlighted the need for easy-to-setup systems (installation time=15min), which stresses the importance of mechanical comfort and customization of application. The development of signal processing techniques has led to improvements of the P3Speller paradigm. A first prototype of a 32-channel EEG recording system is under development. To ease the EEG measurements and reduce installation time, the system has a reduced size. It includes the analog amplification and digital conversion of 32 channels sampled at 1 kHz, as well as the wireless data transmission to a computer. First in vivo validations were performed on small animals. This system will be optimized and connected to a headset specifically designed to provide a comfortable and handy interface with dry electrodes. The present project will still run for one and a half years ,ending with its clinical validation in a population of severely disabled patients, which will compare performances of the system with existing assistive technologies. At this stage, the proposed system yields very promising results, and outperforms the current state-of-the-art. If such a system is shown to perform better than current users assistive technology, it could reach the commercial availability for severely disabled patients within the next 5 years.

[1]  Ronald Phlypo,et al.  EEG sensor selection by sparse spatial filtering in P300 speller brain-computer interface , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[2]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  A pilot study for improving the graphical user interface of P300 based BCIs , 2010 .

[3]  N. Birbaumer Breaking the silence: brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[4]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  E. W. Sellers,et al.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Klas Ihme,et al.  A Dry EEG-System for Scientific Research and Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  A high performance sensorimotor beta rhythm-based brain–computer interface associated with human natural motor behavior , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Christian Jutten,et al.  Suboptimal sensor subset evaluation in a P300 brain-computer interface , 2010, 2010 18th European Signal Processing Conference.

[9]  C. Cinel,et al.  P300-Based BCI Mouse With Genetically-Optimized Analogue Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Daniel Moran,et al.  Evolution of brain–computer interface: action potentials, local field potentials and electrocorticograms , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  Emmanuel Maby,et al.  Reducing Calibration Time for the P300 Brain-Computer Interface Speller , 2010 .

[12]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  xDAWN Algorithm to Enhance Evoked Potentials: Application to Brain–Computer Interface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  OpenViBE: An Open-Source Software Platform to Design, Test, and Use BrainComputer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[14]  E. Maby,et al.  Impact of the time segment analysis for P300 detection with spatial filtering , 2010, 2010 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL 2010).

[15]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball brain–computer interface for binary choices , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  James C. Christensen,et al.  Validation of a Dry Electrode System for EEG , 2009 .

[18]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Marco Congedo,et al.  Spatio-temporal feature extraction and classification of Event-Related Potentials , 2011 .

[20]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  O Bertrand,et al.  A robust sensor-selection method for P300 brain–computer interfaces , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[23]  Alain Rakotomamonjy,et al.  BCI Competition III: Dataset II- Ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 Speller , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.